Cargando…

Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: We developed a new postdischarge system of care comprising a structured assessment covering longer-term problems experienced by patients with stroke and their carers, linked to evidence-based treatment algorithms and reference guides (the longer-term stroke care system of ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forster, Anne, Young, John, Chapman, Katie, Nixon, Jane, Patel, Anita, Holloway, Ivana, Mellish, Kirste, Anwar, Shamaila, Breen, Rachel, Knapp, Martin, Murray, Jenni, Farrin, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26152298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008585
_version_ 1782382554972684288
author Forster, Anne
Young, John
Chapman, Katie
Nixon, Jane
Patel, Anita
Holloway, Ivana
Mellish, Kirste
Anwar, Shamaila
Breen, Rachel
Knapp, Martin
Murray, Jenni
Farrin, Amanda
author_facet Forster, Anne
Young, John
Chapman, Katie
Nixon, Jane
Patel, Anita
Holloway, Ivana
Mellish, Kirste
Anwar, Shamaila
Breen, Rachel
Knapp, Martin
Murray, Jenni
Farrin, Amanda
author_sort Forster, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: We developed a new postdischarge system of care comprising a structured assessment covering longer-term problems experienced by patients with stroke and their carers, linked to evidence-based treatment algorithms and reference guides (the longer-term stroke care system of care) to address the poor longer-term recovery experienced by many patients with stroke. METHODS—: A pragmatic, multicentre, cluster randomized controlled trial of this system of care. Eligible patients referred to community-based Stroke Care Coordinators were randomized to receive the new system of care or usual practice. The primary outcome was improved patient psychological well-being (General Health Questionnaire-12) at 6 months; secondary outcomes included functional outcomes for patients, carer outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Follow-up was through self-completed postal questionnaires at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS—: Thirty-two stroke services were randomized (29 participated); 800 patients (399 control; 401 intervention) and 208 carers (100 control; 108 intervention) were recruited. In intention to treat analysis, the adjusted difference in patient General Health Questionnaire-12 mean scores at 6 months was −0.6 points (95% confidence interval, −1.8 to 0.7; P=0.394) indicating no evidence of statistically significant difference between the groups. Costs of Stroke Care Coordinator inputs, total health and social care costs, and quality-adjusted life year gains at 6 months, 12 months, and over the year were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS—: This robust trial demonstrated no benefit in clinical or cost-effectiveness outcomes associated with the new system of care compared with usual Stroke Care Coordinator practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN 67932305.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45127482015-08-03 Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care Forster, Anne Young, John Chapman, Katie Nixon, Jane Patel, Anita Holloway, Ivana Mellish, Kirste Anwar, Shamaila Breen, Rachel Knapp, Martin Murray, Jenni Farrin, Amanda Stroke Original Contributions BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: We developed a new postdischarge system of care comprising a structured assessment covering longer-term problems experienced by patients with stroke and their carers, linked to evidence-based treatment algorithms and reference guides (the longer-term stroke care system of care) to address the poor longer-term recovery experienced by many patients with stroke. METHODS—: A pragmatic, multicentre, cluster randomized controlled trial of this system of care. Eligible patients referred to community-based Stroke Care Coordinators were randomized to receive the new system of care or usual practice. The primary outcome was improved patient psychological well-being (General Health Questionnaire-12) at 6 months; secondary outcomes included functional outcomes for patients, carer outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Follow-up was through self-completed postal questionnaires at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS—: Thirty-two stroke services were randomized (29 participated); 800 patients (399 control; 401 intervention) and 208 carers (100 control; 108 intervention) were recruited. In intention to treat analysis, the adjusted difference in patient General Health Questionnaire-12 mean scores at 6 months was −0.6 points (95% confidence interval, −1.8 to 0.7; P=0.394) indicating no evidence of statistically significant difference between the groups. Costs of Stroke Care Coordinator inputs, total health and social care costs, and quality-adjusted life year gains at 6 months, 12 months, and over the year were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS—: This robust trial demonstrated no benefit in clinical or cost-effectiveness outcomes associated with the new system of care compared with usual Stroke Care Coordinator practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN 67932305. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-08 2015-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4512748/ /pubmed/26152298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008585 Text en © 2015 Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Forster, Anne
Young, John
Chapman, Katie
Nixon, Jane
Patel, Anita
Holloway, Ivana
Mellish, Kirste
Anwar, Shamaila
Breen, Rachel
Knapp, Martin
Murray, Jenni
Farrin, Amanda
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care
title Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care
title_full Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care
title_fullStr Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care
title_full_unstemmed Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care
title_short Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care
title_sort cluster randomized controlled trial: clinical and cost-effectiveness of a system of longer-term stroke care
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26152298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008585
work_keys_str_mv AT forsteranne clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT youngjohn clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT chapmankatie clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT nixonjane clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT patelanita clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT hollowayivana clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT mellishkirste clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT anwarshamaila clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT breenrachel clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT knappmartin clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT murrayjenni clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare
AT farrinamanda clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialclinicalandcosteffectivenessofasystemoflongertermstrokecare