Cargando…

Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy

BACKGROUND: Irrigation and instrumentation during ureterorenoscopic procedures may cause increased pressure in the renal pelvis (PP) with potential harmful adverse effects. In order to assess the pressure increases during ureterorenoscopy, we measured the intraluminal renal pelvic pressure during re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Helene, Osther, Palle J S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4
_version_ 1782382571770871808
author Jung, Helene
Osther, Palle J S
author_facet Jung, Helene
Osther, Palle J S
author_sort Jung, Helene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irrigation and instrumentation during ureterorenoscopic procedures may cause increased pressure in the renal pelvis (PP) with potential harmful adverse effects. In order to assess the pressure increases during ureterorenoscopy, we measured the intraluminal renal pelvic pressure during retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS). METHODS: Twelve patients admitted for RIRS were included. Irrigation rate was standardized to 8 ml/min. A ureteral catheter was retrogradely placed in the renal pelvis for PP measurements. PP was measured one time per second during insertion of the Storz Flex-X2 ureteroscope and during stone treatment. RESULTS: Baseline PP was mean 10(±4.0) mmHg. During simple ureterorenoscopy, PP was mean 35(±10) mmHg. During stone management the average PP was 54(±18) mmHg and pelvic pressure peaks up to 328 mmHg occurred. In a 5-min standardized period of simple ureterorenoscopy, 83 pressure peaks >50 mmHg were measured in average per patient (range 2–238). Forced irrigation with a 20 ml syringe resulted in pressure peaks up to 288 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Very high pelvic pressures are obtained during flexible ureterorenoscopy. Taking into consideration that the threshold for pyelovenous backflow is around 30 mmHg, it is concerning that PPs >300 mmHg are not uncommon during these procedures. Methods to monitor and lower the PP during ureterorenoscopy, therefore, are considered of importance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4513000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45130002015-07-27 Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy Jung, Helene Osther, Palle J S Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: Irrigation and instrumentation during ureterorenoscopic procedures may cause increased pressure in the renal pelvis (PP) with potential harmful adverse effects. In order to assess the pressure increases during ureterorenoscopy, we measured the intraluminal renal pelvic pressure during retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS). METHODS: Twelve patients admitted for RIRS were included. Irrigation rate was standardized to 8 ml/min. A ureteral catheter was retrogradely placed in the renal pelvis for PP measurements. PP was measured one time per second during insertion of the Storz Flex-X2 ureteroscope and during stone treatment. RESULTS: Baseline PP was mean 10(±4.0) mmHg. During simple ureterorenoscopy, PP was mean 35(±10) mmHg. During stone management the average PP was 54(±18) mmHg and pelvic pressure peaks up to 328 mmHg occurred. In a 5-min standardized period of simple ureterorenoscopy, 83 pressure peaks >50 mmHg were measured in average per patient (range 2–238). Forced irrigation with a 20 ml syringe resulted in pressure peaks up to 288 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Very high pelvic pressures are obtained during flexible ureterorenoscopy. Taking into consideration that the threshold for pyelovenous backflow is around 30 mmHg, it is concerning that PPs >300 mmHg are not uncommon during these procedures. Methods to monitor and lower the PP during ureterorenoscopy, therefore, are considered of importance. Springer International Publishing 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4513000/ /pubmed/26217550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4 Text en © Jung and Osther. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Jung, Helene
Osther, Palle J S
Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy
title Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_full Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_fullStr Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_short Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_sort intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4
work_keys_str_mv AT junghelene intraluminalpressureprofilesduringflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT ostherpallejs intraluminalpressureprofilesduringflexibleureterorenoscopy