Cargando…
What have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in China? A meta-analysis
Although China has the largest population in the world, a faster rate of warming than the global average, and an active global change research program, results from many of the global change experiments in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems have not been included in global syntheses. Here, we specifical...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26205333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12344 |
_version_ | 1782382620744613888 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Zheng Niu, Shuli Dukes, Jeffrey S. |
author_facet | Fu, Zheng Niu, Shuli Dukes, Jeffrey S. |
author_sort | Fu, Zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although China has the largest population in the world, a faster rate of warming than the global average, and an active global change research program, results from many of the global change experiments in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems have not been included in global syntheses. Here, we specifically analyze the observed responses of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in global change manipulative experiments in China, and compare these responses to those from other regions of the world. Most global change factors, vegetation types, and treatment methods that have been studied or used elsewhere in the world have also been studied and applied in China. The responses of terrestrial ecosystem C and N cycles to N addition and climate warming in China are similar in both direction and intensity to those reported in global syntheses. In Chinese ecosystems as elsewhere, N addition significantly increased aboveground (AGB) and belowground biomass (BGB), litter mass, dissolved organic C, net ecosystem productivity (NEP), and gross ecosystem productivity (GEP). Warming stimulated AGB, BGB and the root-shoot ratio. Increasing precipitation accelerated GEP, NEP, microbial respiration, soil respiration, and ecosystem respiration. Our findings complement and support previous global syntheses and provide insight into regional responses to global change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4513293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45132932015-07-29 What have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in China? A meta-analysis Fu, Zheng Niu, Shuli Dukes, Jeffrey S. Sci Rep Article Although China has the largest population in the world, a faster rate of warming than the global average, and an active global change research program, results from many of the global change experiments in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems have not been included in global syntheses. Here, we specifically analyze the observed responses of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in global change manipulative experiments in China, and compare these responses to those from other regions of the world. Most global change factors, vegetation types, and treatment methods that have been studied or used elsewhere in the world have also been studied and applied in China. The responses of terrestrial ecosystem C and N cycles to N addition and climate warming in China are similar in both direction and intensity to those reported in global syntheses. In Chinese ecosystems as elsewhere, N addition significantly increased aboveground (AGB) and belowground biomass (BGB), litter mass, dissolved organic C, net ecosystem productivity (NEP), and gross ecosystem productivity (GEP). Warming stimulated AGB, BGB and the root-shoot ratio. Increasing precipitation accelerated GEP, NEP, microbial respiration, soil respiration, and ecosystem respiration. Our findings complement and support previous global syntheses and provide insight into regional responses to global change. Nature Publishing Group 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4513293/ /pubmed/26205333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12344 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Fu, Zheng Niu, Shuli Dukes, Jeffrey S. What have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in China? A meta-analysis |
title | What have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in China? A meta-analysis |
title_full | What have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in China? A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | What have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in China? A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | What have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in China? A meta-analysis |
title_short | What have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in China? A meta-analysis |
title_sort | what have we learned from global change manipulative experiments in china? a meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26205333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuzheng whathavewelearnedfromglobalchangemanipulativeexperimentsinchinaametaanalysis AT niushuli whathavewelearnedfromglobalchangemanipulativeexperimentsinchinaametaanalysis AT dukesjeffreys whathavewelearnedfromglobalchangemanipulativeexperimentsinchinaametaanalysis |