Cargando…
Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal conditions in patients suffering from erosive esophageal reflux disease (ERD) compared with non erosive esophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients, both treated with long term pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0069-8 |
_version_ | 1782382636453330944 |
---|---|
author | Deppe, Herbert Mücke, Thomas Wagenpfeil, Stefan Kesting, Marco Rozej, Anna Bajbouj, Monther Sculean, Anton |
author_facet | Deppe, Herbert Mücke, Thomas Wagenpfeil, Stefan Kesting, Marco Rozej, Anna Bajbouj, Monther Sculean, Anton |
author_sort | Deppe, Herbert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal conditions in patients suffering from erosive esophageal reflux disease (ERD) compared with non erosive esophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients, both treated with long term proton pump inhibitors (PPI). METHODS: Seventy-one patients with diagnosed GERD were studied: i.e. 29 ERD and 42 NERD patients. Thorough visual examination of the oral mucosa and a periodontal evaluation was performed. The primary outcome was defined as a statistically significant difference, between the two groups, in the presence of acidic lesions of the oral mucosa and specific periodontal parameters. RESULTS: This study failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences between ERD and NERD patients with respect to the prevalence of oral mucosal lesions. However, significantly more ERD patients suffered from severe periodontitis (CAL ≥ 5 mm) as compared to NERD patients. Accordingly, it may be assumed that PPI-use had no adverse effects on the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and on periodontal destruction. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study it may be concluded that ERD and NERD patients need separate evaluation with respect to periodontal destruction. Moreover, long term PPI medication had no adverse clinical impact on acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal destruction. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the role of reflux in the periodontal destruction of ERD individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4513381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45133812015-07-25 Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients Deppe, Herbert Mücke, Thomas Wagenpfeil, Stefan Kesting, Marco Rozej, Anna Bajbouj, Monther Sculean, Anton BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal conditions in patients suffering from erosive esophageal reflux disease (ERD) compared with non erosive esophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients, both treated with long term proton pump inhibitors (PPI). METHODS: Seventy-one patients with diagnosed GERD were studied: i.e. 29 ERD and 42 NERD patients. Thorough visual examination of the oral mucosa and a periodontal evaluation was performed. The primary outcome was defined as a statistically significant difference, between the two groups, in the presence of acidic lesions of the oral mucosa and specific periodontal parameters. RESULTS: This study failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences between ERD and NERD patients with respect to the prevalence of oral mucosal lesions. However, significantly more ERD patients suffered from severe periodontitis (CAL ≥ 5 mm) as compared to NERD patients. Accordingly, it may be assumed that PPI-use had no adverse effects on the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and on periodontal destruction. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study it may be concluded that ERD and NERD patients need separate evaluation with respect to periodontal destruction. Moreover, long term PPI medication had no adverse clinical impact on acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal destruction. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the role of reflux in the periodontal destruction of ERD individuals. BioMed Central 2015-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4513381/ /pubmed/26208714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0069-8 Text en © Deppe et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Deppe, Herbert Mücke, Thomas Wagenpfeil, Stefan Kesting, Marco Rozej, Anna Bajbouj, Monther Sculean, Anton Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients |
title | Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients |
title_full | Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients |
title_fullStr | Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients |
title_short | Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients |
title_sort | erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0069-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deppeherbert erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients AT muckethomas erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients AT wagenpfeilstefan erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients AT kestingmarco erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients AT rozejanna erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients AT bajboujmonther erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients AT sculeananton erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients |