Cargando…

Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal conditions in patients suffering from erosive esophageal reflux disease (ERD) compared with non erosive esophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients, both treated with long term pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deppe, Herbert, Mücke, Thomas, Wagenpfeil, Stefan, Kesting, Marco, Rozej, Anna, Bajbouj, Monther, Sculean, Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0069-8
_version_ 1782382636453330944
author Deppe, Herbert
Mücke, Thomas
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Kesting, Marco
Rozej, Anna
Bajbouj, Monther
Sculean, Anton
author_facet Deppe, Herbert
Mücke, Thomas
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Kesting, Marco
Rozej, Anna
Bajbouj, Monther
Sculean, Anton
author_sort Deppe, Herbert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal conditions in patients suffering from erosive esophageal reflux disease (ERD) compared with non erosive esophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients, both treated with long term proton pump inhibitors (PPI). METHODS: Seventy-one patients with diagnosed GERD were studied: i.e. 29 ERD and 42 NERD patients. Thorough visual examination of the oral mucosa and a periodontal evaluation was performed. The primary outcome was defined as a statistically significant difference, between the two groups, in the presence of acidic lesions of the oral mucosa and specific periodontal parameters. RESULTS: This study failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences between ERD and NERD patients with respect to the prevalence of oral mucosal lesions. However, significantly more ERD patients suffered from severe periodontitis (CAL ≥ 5 mm) as compared to NERD patients. Accordingly, it may be assumed that PPI-use had no adverse effects on the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and on periodontal destruction. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study it may be concluded that ERD and NERD patients need separate evaluation with respect to periodontal destruction. Moreover, long term PPI medication had no adverse clinical impact on acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal destruction. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the role of reflux in the periodontal destruction of ERD individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4513381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45133812015-07-25 Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients Deppe, Herbert Mücke, Thomas Wagenpfeil, Stefan Kesting, Marco Rozej, Anna Bajbouj, Monther Sculean, Anton BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal conditions in patients suffering from erosive esophageal reflux disease (ERD) compared with non erosive esophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients, both treated with long term proton pump inhibitors (PPI). METHODS: Seventy-one patients with diagnosed GERD were studied: i.e. 29 ERD and 42 NERD patients. Thorough visual examination of the oral mucosa and a periodontal evaluation was performed. The primary outcome was defined as a statistically significant difference, between the two groups, in the presence of acidic lesions of the oral mucosa and specific periodontal parameters. RESULTS: This study failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences between ERD and NERD patients with respect to the prevalence of oral mucosal lesions. However, significantly more ERD patients suffered from severe periodontitis (CAL ≥ 5 mm) as compared to NERD patients. Accordingly, it may be assumed that PPI-use had no adverse effects on the prevalence of acidic oral mucosal lesions and on periodontal destruction. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study it may be concluded that ERD and NERD patients need separate evaluation with respect to periodontal destruction. Moreover, long term PPI medication had no adverse clinical impact on acidic oral mucosal lesions and periodontal destruction. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the role of reflux in the periodontal destruction of ERD individuals. BioMed Central 2015-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4513381/ /pubmed/26208714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0069-8 Text en © Deppe et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deppe, Herbert
Mücke, Thomas
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Kesting, Marco
Rozej, Anna
Bajbouj, Monther
Sculean, Anton
Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients
title Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients
title_full Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients
title_fullStr Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients
title_full_unstemmed Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients
title_short Erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients
title_sort erosive esophageal reflux vs. non erosive esophageal reflux: oral findings in 71 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0069-8
work_keys_str_mv AT deppeherbert erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients
AT muckethomas erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients
AT wagenpfeilstefan erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients
AT kestingmarco erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients
AT rozejanna erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients
AT bajboujmonther erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients
AT sculeananton erosiveesophagealrefluxvsnonerosiveesophagealrefluxoralfindingsin71patients