Cargando…

Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer, afflicting light skin more than dark skin people. This malignancy metastasizes rarely and has unique histological properties. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We focused on the accuracy of clinical diagnoses of BCC by specialists. MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammad, Ebrahimzadeh-Ardakani, Mansour, Moghimi, Parichehr, Kafaie, Farideh, Dehghani, Amirhossein, Rashidi, Ahmad, Shojaoddiny-Ardekani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225330
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5178.160257
_version_ 1782382641887051776
author Mohammad, Ebrahimzadeh-Ardakani
Mansour, Moghimi
Parichehr, Kafaie
Farideh, Dehghani
Amirhossein, Rashidi
Ahmad, Shojaoddiny-Ardekani
author_facet Mohammad, Ebrahimzadeh-Ardakani
Mansour, Moghimi
Parichehr, Kafaie
Farideh, Dehghani
Amirhossein, Rashidi
Ahmad, Shojaoddiny-Ardekani
author_sort Mohammad, Ebrahimzadeh-Ardakani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer, afflicting light skin more than dark skin people. This malignancy metastasizes rarely and has unique histological properties. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We focused on the accuracy of clinical diagnoses of BCC by specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients’ information for 4-year period between 2007 and 2011 was extracted from files at a Pathology Department. The results were analyzed using the Chi-square method and SPSS software. RESULTS: From 367 referred cases dermatologists diagnosed 41% as direct BCC cases, 43.4% through excluding other skin diseases, 4% incorrectly and 1.11% unidentified. For other specialists (including plastic surgeons, ophthalmologists, general surgeons, and general practitioners) these were respectively 47.8%, 22.4%, 6.3% and 23.5%. Dermatologists had diagnosed 107 cases of all skin diseases as BCC through clinical examination of which 78.5% were correctly and 21.5% incorrectly diagnosed. The same parameters for all other specialists were respectively 77.36% and 22.64%. Diagnostic sensitivity, positive reportability, clinical conjecture indicator (CCI) and clinical diagnostic indicator were respectively 84.4%, 78.5%, 121.5% and 75.6%; whereas for other specialists these indicators were 70 among cases diagnosed by dermatologists as BCC, where pathological results showed other causes. The most common diagnosis by pathologists and other specialists was reported as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Among cases not diagnosed by dermatologists as BCC, where pathological results indicated BCC, the most common clinical diagnosis was malignant melanoma by dermatologists and SCC by other specialists. CONCLUSION: Dermatologists diagnosed BCC with higher sensitivity and positive reportability; also, CCIs and clinical diagnostic correctness was higher among dermatologists. The necessity for consulting with dermatologists and referring all skin diseases samplings to pathologist is thus clearly visible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4513405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45134052015-07-29 Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma Mohammad, Ebrahimzadeh-Ardakani Mansour, Moghimi Parichehr, Kafaie Farideh, Dehghani Amirhossein, Rashidi Ahmad, Shojaoddiny-Ardekani Indian Dermatol Online J Original Article BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer, afflicting light skin more than dark skin people. This malignancy metastasizes rarely and has unique histological properties. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We focused on the accuracy of clinical diagnoses of BCC by specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients’ information for 4-year period between 2007 and 2011 was extracted from files at a Pathology Department. The results were analyzed using the Chi-square method and SPSS software. RESULTS: From 367 referred cases dermatologists diagnosed 41% as direct BCC cases, 43.4% through excluding other skin diseases, 4% incorrectly and 1.11% unidentified. For other specialists (including plastic surgeons, ophthalmologists, general surgeons, and general practitioners) these were respectively 47.8%, 22.4%, 6.3% and 23.5%. Dermatologists had diagnosed 107 cases of all skin diseases as BCC through clinical examination of which 78.5% were correctly and 21.5% incorrectly diagnosed. The same parameters for all other specialists were respectively 77.36% and 22.64%. Diagnostic sensitivity, positive reportability, clinical conjecture indicator (CCI) and clinical diagnostic indicator were respectively 84.4%, 78.5%, 121.5% and 75.6%; whereas for other specialists these indicators were 70 among cases diagnosed by dermatologists as BCC, where pathological results showed other causes. The most common diagnosis by pathologists and other specialists was reported as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Among cases not diagnosed by dermatologists as BCC, where pathological results indicated BCC, the most common clinical diagnosis was malignant melanoma by dermatologists and SCC by other specialists. CONCLUSION: Dermatologists diagnosed BCC with higher sensitivity and positive reportability; also, CCIs and clinical diagnostic correctness was higher among dermatologists. The necessity for consulting with dermatologists and referring all skin diseases samplings to pathologist is thus clearly visible. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4513405/ /pubmed/26225330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5178.160257 Text en Copyright: © Indian Dermatology Online Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammad, Ebrahimzadeh-Ardakani
Mansour, Moghimi
Parichehr, Kafaie
Farideh, Dehghani
Amirhossein, Rashidi
Ahmad, Shojaoddiny-Ardekani
Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma
title Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma
title_full Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma
title_short Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma
title_sort assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225330
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5178.160257
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadebrahimzadehardakani assessmentofclinicaldiagnosticaccuracycomparedwithpathologicaldiagnosisofbasalcellcarcinoma
AT mansourmoghimi assessmentofclinicaldiagnosticaccuracycomparedwithpathologicaldiagnosisofbasalcellcarcinoma
AT parichehrkafaie assessmentofclinicaldiagnosticaccuracycomparedwithpathologicaldiagnosisofbasalcellcarcinoma
AT faridehdehghani assessmentofclinicaldiagnosticaccuracycomparedwithpathologicaldiagnosisofbasalcellcarcinoma
AT amirhosseinrashidi assessmentofclinicaldiagnosticaccuracycomparedwithpathologicaldiagnosisofbasalcellcarcinoma
AT ahmadshojaoddinyardekani assessmentofclinicaldiagnosticaccuracycomparedwithpathologicaldiagnosisofbasalcellcarcinoma