Cargando…
Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
OBJECTIVES: The Acne Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was set up to identify and rank treatment uncertainties by bringing together people with acne, and professionals providing care within and beyond the National Health Service (NHS). SETTING: The UK with international participation. PARTICIPANTS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26187120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008085 |
_version_ | 1782382657010663424 |
---|---|
author | Layton, Alison Eady, E Anne Peat, Maggie Whitehouse, Heather Levell, Nick Ridd, Matthew Cowdell, Fiona Patel, Mahenda Andrews, Stephen Oxnard, Christine Fenton, Mark Firkins, Lester |
author_facet | Layton, Alison Eady, E Anne Peat, Maggie Whitehouse, Heather Levell, Nick Ridd, Matthew Cowdell, Fiona Patel, Mahenda Andrews, Stephen Oxnard, Christine Fenton, Mark Firkins, Lester |
author_sort | Layton, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Acne Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was set up to identify and rank treatment uncertainties by bringing together people with acne, and professionals providing care within and beyond the National Health Service (NHS). SETTING: The UK with international participation. PARTICIPANTS: Teenagers and adults with acne, parents, partners, nurses, clinicians, pharmacists, private practitioners. METHODS: Treatment uncertainties were collected via separate online harvesting surveys, embedded within the PSP website, for patients and professionals. A wide variety of approaches were used to promote the surveys to stakeholder groups with a particular emphasis on teenagers and young adults. Survey submissions were collated using keywords and verified as uncertainties by appraising existing evidence. The 30 most popular themes were ranked via weighted scores from an online vote. At a priority setting workshop, patients and professionals discussed the 18 highest-scoring questions from the vote, and reached consensus on the top 10. RESULTS: In the harvesting survey, 2310 people, including 652 professionals and 1456 patients (58% aged 24 y or younger), made submissions containing at least one research question. After checking for relevance and rephrasing, a total of 6255 questions were collated into themes. Valid votes ranking the 30 most common themes were obtained from 2807 participants. The top 10 uncertainties prioritised at the workshop were largely focused on management strategies, optimum use of common prescription medications and the role of non-drug based interventions. More female than male patients took part in the harvesting surveys and vote. A wider range of uncertainties were provided by patients compared to professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging teenagers and young adults in priority setting is achievable using a variety of promotional methods. The top 10 uncertainties reveal an extensive knowledge gap about widely used interventions and the relative merits of drug versus non-drug based treatments in acne management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4513497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45134972015-07-27 Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership Layton, Alison Eady, E Anne Peat, Maggie Whitehouse, Heather Levell, Nick Ridd, Matthew Cowdell, Fiona Patel, Mahenda Andrews, Stephen Oxnard, Christine Fenton, Mark Firkins, Lester BMJ Open Dermatology OBJECTIVES: The Acne Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was set up to identify and rank treatment uncertainties by bringing together people with acne, and professionals providing care within and beyond the National Health Service (NHS). SETTING: The UK with international participation. PARTICIPANTS: Teenagers and adults with acne, parents, partners, nurses, clinicians, pharmacists, private practitioners. METHODS: Treatment uncertainties were collected via separate online harvesting surveys, embedded within the PSP website, for patients and professionals. A wide variety of approaches were used to promote the surveys to stakeholder groups with a particular emphasis on teenagers and young adults. Survey submissions were collated using keywords and verified as uncertainties by appraising existing evidence. The 30 most popular themes were ranked via weighted scores from an online vote. At a priority setting workshop, patients and professionals discussed the 18 highest-scoring questions from the vote, and reached consensus on the top 10. RESULTS: In the harvesting survey, 2310 people, including 652 professionals and 1456 patients (58% aged 24 y or younger), made submissions containing at least one research question. After checking for relevance and rephrasing, a total of 6255 questions were collated into themes. Valid votes ranking the 30 most common themes were obtained from 2807 participants. The top 10 uncertainties prioritised at the workshop were largely focused on management strategies, optimum use of common prescription medications and the role of non-drug based interventions. More female than male patients took part in the harvesting surveys and vote. A wider range of uncertainties were provided by patients compared to professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging teenagers and young adults in priority setting is achievable using a variety of promotional methods. The top 10 uncertainties reveal an extensive knowledge gap about widely used interventions and the relative merits of drug versus non-drug based treatments in acne management. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4513497/ /pubmed/26187120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008085 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Dermatology Layton, Alison Eady, E Anne Peat, Maggie Whitehouse, Heather Levell, Nick Ridd, Matthew Cowdell, Fiona Patel, Mahenda Andrews, Stephen Oxnard, Christine Fenton, Mark Firkins, Lester Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership |
title | Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership |
title_full | Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership |
title_fullStr | Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership |
title_short | Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership |
title_sort | identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a james lind alliance priority setting partnership |
topic | Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26187120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laytonalison identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT eadyeanne identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT peatmaggie identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT whitehouseheather identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT levellnick identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT riddmatthew identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT cowdellfiona identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT patelmahenda identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT andrewsstephen identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT oxnardchristine identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT fentonmark identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership AT firkinslester identifyingacnetreatmentuncertaintiesviaajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership |