Cargando…
Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids
INTRODUCTION: Currently, we lack understanding of the content, quality and impact of patient decision aids to support decision-making between medical and surgical methods of early abortion. We plan to undertake a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature to identify, appraise and describe the im...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26173718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007966 |
_version_ | 1782382658372763648 |
---|---|
author | Donnelly, Kyla Z Thompson, Rachel |
author_facet | Donnelly, Kyla Z Thompson, Rachel |
author_sort | Donnelly, Kyla Z |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Currently, we lack understanding of the content, quality and impact of patient decision aids to support decision-making between medical and surgical methods of early abortion. We plan to undertake a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature to identify, appraise and describe the impact of early abortion method decision aids evaluated quantitatively (Part I), and an environmental scan to identify and appraise other early abortion method decision aids developed in the US (Part II). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: For the systematic review, we will search PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases for articles describing experimental and observational studies evaluating the impact of an early abortion method decision aid on women's decision-making processes and outcomes. For the environmental scan, we will identify decision aids by supplementing the systematic review search with Internet-based searches and key informant consultation. The primary reviewer will assess all studies and decision aids for eligibility, and a second reviewer will also assess a subset of these. Both reviewers will independently assess risk of bias in the studies and abstract data using a piloted form. Finally, both reviewers will assess decision aid quality using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria, ease of readability using Flesch/Flesch-Kincaid tests, and informational content using directed content analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study does not involve human subjects, ethical approval will not be sought. We aim to disseminate the findings in a scientific journal, via academic and/or professional conferences and among the broader community to contribute knowledge about current early abortion method decision-making support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015016717). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4513513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45135132015-07-27 Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids Donnelly, Kyla Z Thompson, Rachel BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Currently, we lack understanding of the content, quality and impact of patient decision aids to support decision-making between medical and surgical methods of early abortion. We plan to undertake a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature to identify, appraise and describe the impact of early abortion method decision aids evaluated quantitatively (Part I), and an environmental scan to identify and appraise other early abortion method decision aids developed in the US (Part II). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: For the systematic review, we will search PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases for articles describing experimental and observational studies evaluating the impact of an early abortion method decision aid on women's decision-making processes and outcomes. For the environmental scan, we will identify decision aids by supplementing the systematic review search with Internet-based searches and key informant consultation. The primary reviewer will assess all studies and decision aids for eligibility, and a second reviewer will also assess a subset of these. Both reviewers will independently assess risk of bias in the studies and abstract data using a piloted form. Finally, both reviewers will assess decision aid quality using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria, ease of readability using Flesch/Flesch-Kincaid tests, and informational content using directed content analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study does not involve human subjects, ethical approval will not be sought. We aim to disseminate the findings in a scientific journal, via academic and/or professional conferences and among the broader community to contribute knowledge about current early abortion method decision-making support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015016717). BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4513513/ /pubmed/26173718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007966 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Donnelly, Kyla Z Thompson, Rachel Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids |
title | Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids |
title_full | Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids |
title_fullStr | Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids |
title_full_unstemmed | Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids |
title_short | Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids |
title_sort | medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26173718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donnellykylaz medicalversussurgicalmethodsofearlyabortionprotocolforasystematicreviewandenvironmentalscanofpatientdecisionaids AT thompsonrachel medicalversussurgicalmethodsofearlyabortionprotocolforasystematicreviewandenvironmentalscanofpatientdecisionaids |