Cargando…
Can UK NHS research ethics committees effectively monitor publication and outcome reporting bias?
BACKGROUND: Publication and outcome reporting bias is often caused by researchers selectively choosing which scientific results and outcomes to publish. This behaviour is ethically significant as it distorts the literature used for future scientific or clinical decision-making. This study investigat...
Autores principales: | Begum, Rasheda, Kolstoe, Simon |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26206479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0042-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evidence from UK Research Ethics Committee members on what makes a good research ethics review, and what can be improved
por: Sidaway, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Determining the level of data sharing, and number of publications, from research databases that have been given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Trace, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Denneny, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review
por: Trace, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Ranking Research Methodology by Risk — a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members
por: Kolstoe, Simon E., et al.
Publicado: (2023)