Cargando…

Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Saliva using Papanicolaou Stain Induced Fluorescence Method Versus Fluorochrome Staining: An Evaluative Study

BACKGROUND: Fifty years after effective chemotherapy, tuberculosis (TB) still remains leading infectious cause of adult mortality. The aim of present study was to evaluate diagnostic utility of papanicolaou (Pap) stain induced fluorescence microscopic examination of salivary smears in the diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: (Munot), Priya P Lunawat, Mhapuskar, Amit A, Ganvir, S M, Hazarey, Vinay K, Mhapuskar, Madhavi A, Kulkarni, Dinraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229384
_version_ 1782382689389641728
author (Munot), Priya P Lunawat
Mhapuskar, Amit A
Ganvir, S M
Hazarey, Vinay K
Mhapuskar, Madhavi A
Kulkarni, Dinraj
author_facet (Munot), Priya P Lunawat
Mhapuskar, Amit A
Ganvir, S M
Hazarey, Vinay K
Mhapuskar, Madhavi A
Kulkarni, Dinraj
author_sort (Munot), Priya P Lunawat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fifty years after effective chemotherapy, tuberculosis (TB) still remains leading infectious cause of adult mortality. The aim of present study was to evaluate diagnostic utility of papanicolaou (Pap) stain induced fluorescence microscopic examination of salivary smears in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 100 individuals clinically suspected of suffering from active pulmonary TB. Control group – 50 individuals are suffering from any pulmonary disease other than TB such as pneumonia or bronchiogenic carcinoma. Fluorescence microscopic examination of two salivary smears stained by Pap stain and auramine-rhodamine (A-R) stain respectively for each patient. Ziehl–Neelsen stained sputum smear examined under the light microscope for each patient. Culture was done in all the patients for microbiological confirmation. McNemar's Chi-square analysis, Kappa test, and Z-test. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the three staining methods using culture as a reference method were 93.02%, 88.37% and 87.20% for Pap, A-R and Ziehl–Neelson respectively. CONCLUSION: Pap-induced fluorescence of salivary smears is a safe, reliable and rapid method, which can prove as a valuable diagnostic tool for diagnosis of TB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4513763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45137632015-09-01 Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Saliva using Papanicolaou Stain Induced Fluorescence Method Versus Fluorochrome Staining: An Evaluative Study (Munot), Priya P Lunawat Mhapuskar, Amit A Ganvir, S M Hazarey, Vinay K Mhapuskar, Madhavi A Kulkarni, Dinraj J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Fifty years after effective chemotherapy, tuberculosis (TB) still remains leading infectious cause of adult mortality. The aim of present study was to evaluate diagnostic utility of papanicolaou (Pap) stain induced fluorescence microscopic examination of salivary smears in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 100 individuals clinically suspected of suffering from active pulmonary TB. Control group – 50 individuals are suffering from any pulmonary disease other than TB such as pneumonia or bronchiogenic carcinoma. Fluorescence microscopic examination of two salivary smears stained by Pap stain and auramine-rhodamine (A-R) stain respectively for each patient. Ziehl–Neelsen stained sputum smear examined under the light microscope for each patient. Culture was done in all the patients for microbiological confirmation. McNemar's Chi-square analysis, Kappa test, and Z-test. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the three staining methods using culture as a reference method were 93.02%, 88.37% and 87.20% for Pap, A-R and Ziehl–Neelson respectively. CONCLUSION: Pap-induced fluorescence of salivary smears is a safe, reliable and rapid method, which can prove as a valuable diagnostic tool for diagnosis of TB. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4513763/ /pubmed/26229384 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
(Munot), Priya P Lunawat
Mhapuskar, Amit A
Ganvir, S M
Hazarey, Vinay K
Mhapuskar, Madhavi A
Kulkarni, Dinraj
Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Saliva using Papanicolaou Stain Induced Fluorescence Method Versus Fluorochrome Staining: An Evaluative Study
title Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Saliva using Papanicolaou Stain Induced Fluorescence Method Versus Fluorochrome Staining: An Evaluative Study
title_full Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Saliva using Papanicolaou Stain Induced Fluorescence Method Versus Fluorochrome Staining: An Evaluative Study
title_fullStr Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Saliva using Papanicolaou Stain Induced Fluorescence Method Versus Fluorochrome Staining: An Evaluative Study
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Saliva using Papanicolaou Stain Induced Fluorescence Method Versus Fluorochrome Staining: An Evaluative Study
title_short Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Saliva using Papanicolaou Stain Induced Fluorescence Method Versus Fluorochrome Staining: An Evaluative Study
title_sort detection of acid fast bacilli in saliva using papanicolaou stain induced fluorescence method versus fluorochrome staining: an evaluative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229384
work_keys_str_mv AT munotpriyaplunawat detectionofacidfastbacilliinsalivausingpapanicolaoustaininducedfluorescencemethodversusfluorochromestaininganevaluativestudy
AT mhapuskaramita detectionofacidfastbacilliinsalivausingpapanicolaoustaininducedfluorescencemethodversusfluorochromestaininganevaluativestudy
AT ganvirsm detectionofacidfastbacilliinsalivausingpapanicolaoustaininducedfluorescencemethodversusfluorochromestaininganevaluativestudy
AT hazareyvinayk detectionofacidfastbacilliinsalivausingpapanicolaoustaininducedfluorescencemethodversusfluorochromestaininganevaluativestudy
AT mhapuskarmadhavia detectionofacidfastbacilliinsalivausingpapanicolaoustaininducedfluorescencemethodversusfluorochromestaininganevaluativestudy
AT kulkarnidinraj detectionofacidfastbacilliinsalivausingpapanicolaoustaininducedfluorescencemethodversusfluorochromestaininganevaluativestudy