Cargando…

Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks after low anterior resection for rectal cancer remain the most feared complication. The aim of our study was to investigate whether the use of a transanal tube could reduce the leakage rate after this surgical procedure. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Adamova, Zuzana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften GmbH 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000369569
_version_ 1782382705028104192
author Adamova, Zuzana
author_facet Adamova, Zuzana
author_sort Adamova, Zuzana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks after low anterior resection for rectal cancer remain the most feared complication. The aim of our study was to investigate whether the use of a transanal tube could reduce the leakage rate after this surgical procedure. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a single-institution experience. The study includes 66 patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer without stoma creation between January 2008 and June 2013. Patients were divided into two groups, i.e. those with a transanal drainage tube (TT; n = 9) and those without tube (NTT; n = 57), and evaluated for clinically evident anastomotic leakage and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The postoperative anastomotic leakage appeared in 5 patients (9%) in the NTT group while no single case was observed within the TT group. Despite the disadvantageous background in the TT group (a transanal stent was used in the most high-risk patients), these patients had no postoperative complications. In the NTT group, 23% had some kind of postoperative complications, and 5% died. The difference between the two groups is not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the use of a transanal tube in low anterior resection for rectal cancer could potentially be a simple and effective method of reducing anastomotic leakage. In order to prove our observations, larger prospective randomized studies should be performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4513832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher S. Karger Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45138322015-12-01 Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery Adamova, Zuzana Viszeralmedizin Original Article • Originalarbeit BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks after low anterior resection for rectal cancer remain the most feared complication. The aim of our study was to investigate whether the use of a transanal tube could reduce the leakage rate after this surgical procedure. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a single-institution experience. The study includes 66 patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer without stoma creation between January 2008 and June 2013. Patients were divided into two groups, i.e. those with a transanal drainage tube (TT; n = 9) and those without tube (NTT; n = 57), and evaluated for clinically evident anastomotic leakage and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The postoperative anastomotic leakage appeared in 5 patients (9%) in the NTT group while no single case was observed within the TT group. Despite the disadvantageous background in the TT group (a transanal stent was used in the most high-risk patients), these patients had no postoperative complications. In the NTT group, 23% had some kind of postoperative complications, and 5% died. The difference between the two groups is not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the use of a transanal tube in low anterior resection for rectal cancer could potentially be a simple and effective method of reducing anastomotic leakage. In order to prove our observations, larger prospective randomized studies should be performed. S. Karger Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften GmbH 2014-12 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4513832/ /pubmed/26288609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000369569 Text en Copyright © 2014 by S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
spellingShingle Original Article • Originalarbeit
Adamova, Zuzana
Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery
title Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery
title_full Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery
title_fullStr Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery
title_short Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery
title_sort transanal tube as a means of prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery
topic Original Article • Originalarbeit
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4513832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000369569
work_keys_str_mv AT adamovazuzana transanaltubeasameansofpreventionofanastomoticleakageafterrectalcancersurgery