Cargando…

Is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? A review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context

The present paper focuses on biomonitoring of elemental atmospheric pollution, which is reviewed in terms of larger-scaled biomonitoring surveys in an epidemiological context. Based on the literature information, today’s availability of solar-powered small air filter samplers and fibrous ion exchang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolterbeek, Bert, Sarmento, Susana, Verburg, Tona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26224902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0637-y
_version_ 1782382769305812992
author Wolterbeek, Bert
Sarmento, Susana
Verburg, Tona
author_facet Wolterbeek, Bert
Sarmento, Susana
Verburg, Tona
author_sort Wolterbeek, Bert
collection PubMed
description The present paper focuses on biomonitoring of elemental atmospheric pollution, which is reviewed in terms of larger-scaled biomonitoring surveys in an epidemiological context. Based on the literature information, today’s availability of solar-powered small air filter samplers and fibrous ion exchange materials is regarded as adequate or an even better alternative for biomonitor transplant materials used in small-scaled set-ups, but biomonitors remain valuable in larger-scaled set-ups and in unforeseen releases and accidental situations. In the latter case, in-situ biomonitoring is seen as the only option for a retrospective study: biomoniors are there before one even knows that they are needed. For biomonitoring, nuclear analytical techniques are discussed as key techniques, especially because of the necessary multi-element assessments in both source recognition and single-element interpretation. To live up to the demands in an epidemiological context, larger-scaled in-situ biomonitoring asks for large numbers of samples, and consequently, for large total sample masses, this all to ensure representation of both local situations and survey area characteristics. Possibly, this point should direct studies into new “easy-to-sample” biomonitor organisms, of which high masses and numbers may be obtained in field work, rather than continue with biomonitors such as lichens. This also means that both sample handling and processing are of key importance in these studies. To avoid problems in comparability of analytical general procedures in milling, homogenization and digestion of samples of large masses, the paper proposes to involve only few but high-quality laboratories in the total element assessment routines. In this respect, facilities that can handle large sample masses in the assessment of element concentrations are to be preferred. This all highlights the involvement of large-sample-volume nuclear facilities, which, however, should be upgraded and automated in their operation to ensure the necessary sample throughput in larger-scaled biomonitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4514461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45144612015-07-27 Is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? A review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context Wolterbeek, Bert Sarmento, Susana Verburg, Tona J Radioanal Nucl Chem Article The present paper focuses on biomonitoring of elemental atmospheric pollution, which is reviewed in terms of larger-scaled biomonitoring surveys in an epidemiological context. Based on the literature information, today’s availability of solar-powered small air filter samplers and fibrous ion exchange materials is regarded as adequate or an even better alternative for biomonitor transplant materials used in small-scaled set-ups, but biomonitors remain valuable in larger-scaled set-ups and in unforeseen releases and accidental situations. In the latter case, in-situ biomonitoring is seen as the only option for a retrospective study: biomoniors are there before one even knows that they are needed. For biomonitoring, nuclear analytical techniques are discussed as key techniques, especially because of the necessary multi-element assessments in both source recognition and single-element interpretation. To live up to the demands in an epidemiological context, larger-scaled in-situ biomonitoring asks for large numbers of samples, and consequently, for large total sample masses, this all to ensure representation of both local situations and survey area characteristics. Possibly, this point should direct studies into new “easy-to-sample” biomonitor organisms, of which high masses and numbers may be obtained in field work, rather than continue with biomonitors such as lichens. This also means that both sample handling and processing are of key importance in these studies. To avoid problems in comparability of analytical general procedures in milling, homogenization and digestion of samples of large masses, the paper proposes to involve only few but high-quality laboratories in the total element assessment routines. In this respect, facilities that can handle large sample masses in the assessment of element concentrations are to be preferred. This all highlights the involvement of large-sample-volume nuclear facilities, which, however, should be upgraded and automated in their operation to ensure the necessary sample throughput in larger-scaled biomonitoring. Springer Netherlands 2010-06-05 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC4514461/ /pubmed/26224902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0637-y Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Wolterbeek, Bert
Sarmento, Susana
Verburg, Tona
Is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? A review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context
title Is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? A review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context
title_full Is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? A review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context
title_fullStr Is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? A review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context
title_full_unstemmed Is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? A review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context
title_short Is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? A review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context
title_sort is there a future for biomonitoring of elemental air pollution? a review focused on a larger-scaled health-related (epidemiological) context
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26224902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0637-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wolterbeekbert isthereafutureforbiomonitoringofelementalairpollutionareviewfocusedonalargerscaledhealthrelatedepidemiologicalcontext
AT sarmentosusana isthereafutureforbiomonitoringofelementalairpollutionareviewfocusedonalargerscaledhealthrelatedepidemiologicalcontext
AT verburgtona isthereafutureforbiomonitoringofelementalairpollutionareviewfocusedonalargerscaledhealthrelatedepidemiologicalcontext