Cargando…

Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses

Differences in copper (Cu) absorption and transport, physiological responses and structural characteristics between two types of Cu-resistant plants, Oenothera glazioviana (Cu-exclusion type) and Elsholtzia haichowensis (Cu-enrichment type), were investigated in the present study. The results indica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Lei, Chen, Chen, Wang, Bin, Zhou, Xishi, Li, Shuhuan, Guo, Pan, Shen, Zhenguo, Wang, Guiping, Chen, Yahua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133424
_version_ 1782382772674887680
author Fu, Lei
Chen, Chen
Wang, Bin
Zhou, Xishi
Li, Shuhuan
Guo, Pan
Shen, Zhenguo
Wang, Guiping
Chen, Yahua
author_facet Fu, Lei
Chen, Chen
Wang, Bin
Zhou, Xishi
Li, Shuhuan
Guo, Pan
Shen, Zhenguo
Wang, Guiping
Chen, Yahua
author_sort Fu, Lei
collection PubMed
description Differences in copper (Cu) absorption and transport, physiological responses and structural characteristics between two types of Cu-resistant plants, Oenothera glazioviana (Cu-exclusion type) and Elsholtzia haichowensis (Cu-enrichment type), were investigated in the present study. The results indicated the following: (1) After 50 μM Cu treatment, the Cu ratio in the xylem vessels of E. haichowensis increased by 60%. A Cu adsorption experiment indicated that O. glazioviana exhibited greater resistance to Cu, and Cu absorption and the shoot/root ratio of Cu were significantly lower in O. glazioviana than in E. haichowensis. (2) An analysis of the endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) variance and exogenous ABA treatment demonstrated that the ABA levels of both plants did not differ; exogenous ABA treatment clearly reduced Cu accumulation in both plants. (3) The leaf stomatal density of O. glazioviana was significantly less than that of E. haichowensis. Guard cells in E. haichowensis plants were covered with a thick cuticle layer, the epidermal hair was more numerous and longer, and the number of xylem conduits in the root was small. (4) The transpiration rate and the stomatal conductance of O. glazioviana were both significantly lower than those of E. haichowensis, regardless of whether the plants were treated with Cu. Taken together, these results indicate that the differences in the structural characteristics between these two plant species, particularly in the characteristics related to plant transpiration, are important factors that govern whether plants acquire or exclude Cu.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4514476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45144762015-07-29 Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses Fu, Lei Chen, Chen Wang, Bin Zhou, Xishi Li, Shuhuan Guo, Pan Shen, Zhenguo Wang, Guiping Chen, Yahua PLoS One Research Article Differences in copper (Cu) absorption and transport, physiological responses and structural characteristics between two types of Cu-resistant plants, Oenothera glazioviana (Cu-exclusion type) and Elsholtzia haichowensis (Cu-enrichment type), were investigated in the present study. The results indicated the following: (1) After 50 μM Cu treatment, the Cu ratio in the xylem vessels of E. haichowensis increased by 60%. A Cu adsorption experiment indicated that O. glazioviana exhibited greater resistance to Cu, and Cu absorption and the shoot/root ratio of Cu were significantly lower in O. glazioviana than in E. haichowensis. (2) An analysis of the endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) variance and exogenous ABA treatment demonstrated that the ABA levels of both plants did not differ; exogenous ABA treatment clearly reduced Cu accumulation in both plants. (3) The leaf stomatal density of O. glazioviana was significantly less than that of E. haichowensis. Guard cells in E. haichowensis plants were covered with a thick cuticle layer, the epidermal hair was more numerous and longer, and the number of xylem conduits in the root was small. (4) The transpiration rate and the stomatal conductance of O. glazioviana were both significantly lower than those of E. haichowensis, regardless of whether the plants were treated with Cu. Taken together, these results indicate that the differences in the structural characteristics between these two plant species, particularly in the characteristics related to plant transpiration, are important factors that govern whether plants acquire or exclude Cu. Public Library of Science 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4514476/ /pubmed/26207743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133424 Text en © 2015 Fu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fu, Lei
Chen, Chen
Wang, Bin
Zhou, Xishi
Li, Shuhuan
Guo, Pan
Shen, Zhenguo
Wang, Guiping
Chen, Yahua
Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses
title Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses
title_full Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses
title_fullStr Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses
title_short Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses
title_sort differences in copper absorption and accumulation between copper-exclusion and copper-enrichment plants: a comparison of structure and physiological responses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133424
work_keys_str_mv AT fulei differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT chenchen differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT wangbin differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT zhouxishi differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT lishuhuan differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT guopan differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT shenzhenguo differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT wangguiping differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT chenyahua differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses