Cargando…

Detecting When “Quality of Life” Has Been “Enhanced”: Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate challenges in the estimation of change in quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Data were taken from a completed clinical trial with negative results. Responses to 13 QOL items were obtained 12 months apart from 258 persons with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) participating in a randomi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tractenberg, Rochelle E., Yumoto, Futoshi, Aisen, Paul S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213645
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.34A005
_version_ 1782382773577711616
author Tractenberg, Rochelle E.
Yumoto, Futoshi
Aisen, Paul S.
author_facet Tractenberg, Rochelle E.
Yumoto, Futoshi
Aisen, Paul S.
author_sort Tractenberg, Rochelle E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate challenges in the estimation of change in quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Data were taken from a completed clinical trial with negative results. Responses to 13 QOL items were obtained 12 months apart from 258 persons with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) participating in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with two treatment arms. Two analyses to estimate whether “change” in QOL occurred over 12 months are described. A simple difference (later - earlier) was calculated from total scores (standard approach). A Qualified Change algorithm (novel approach) was applied to each item: differences in ratings were classified as either: improved, worsened, stayed poor, or stayed “positive” (fair, good, excellent). The strengths of evidence supporting a claim that “QOL changed”, derived from the two analyses, were compared by considering plausible alternative explanations for, and interpretations of, results obtained under each approach. RESULTS: Total score approach: QOL total scores decreased, on average, in the two treatment (both −1.0, p < 0.05), but not the placebo (=−0.59, p > 0.3) groups. Qualified change approach: Roughly 60% of all change in QOL items was worsening in every arm; 17% - 42% of all subjects experienced change in each item. CONCLUSIONS: Totalling the subjective QOL item ratings collapses over items, and suggests a potentially misleading “overall” level of change (or no change, as in the placebo arm). Leaving the items as individual components of “quality” of life they were intended to capture, and qualifying the direction and amount of change in each, suggests that at least 17% of any group experienced change on every item, with 60% of all observed change being worsening. DISCUSSION: Summarizing QOL item ratings as a total “score” collapses over the face-valid, multi-dimensional components of the construct “quality of life”. Qualified Change provides robust evidence of changes to QOL or “enhancements of” life quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4514524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45145242015-07-24 Detecting When “Quality of Life” Has Been “Enhanced”: Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings Tractenberg, Rochelle E. Yumoto, Futoshi Aisen, Paul S. Open J Philos Article OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate challenges in the estimation of change in quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Data were taken from a completed clinical trial with negative results. Responses to 13 QOL items were obtained 12 months apart from 258 persons with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) participating in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with two treatment arms. Two analyses to estimate whether “change” in QOL occurred over 12 months are described. A simple difference (later - earlier) was calculated from total scores (standard approach). A Qualified Change algorithm (novel approach) was applied to each item: differences in ratings were classified as either: improved, worsened, stayed poor, or stayed “positive” (fair, good, excellent). The strengths of evidence supporting a claim that “QOL changed”, derived from the two analyses, were compared by considering plausible alternative explanations for, and interpretations of, results obtained under each approach. RESULTS: Total score approach: QOL total scores decreased, on average, in the two treatment (both −1.0, p < 0.05), but not the placebo (=−0.59, p > 0.3) groups. Qualified change approach: Roughly 60% of all change in QOL items was worsening in every arm; 17% - 42% of all subjects experienced change in each item. CONCLUSIONS: Totalling the subjective QOL item ratings collapses over items, and suggests a potentially misleading “overall” level of change (or no change, as in the placebo arm). Leaving the items as individual components of “quality” of life they were intended to capture, and qualifying the direction and amount of change in each, suggests that at least 17% of any group experienced change on every item, with 60% of all observed change being worsening. DISCUSSION: Summarizing QOL item ratings as a total “score” collapses over the face-valid, multi-dimensional components of the construct “quality of life”. Qualified Change provides robust evidence of changes to QOL or “enhancements of” life quality. 2013-11-01 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4514524/ /pubmed/26213645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.34A005 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rochelle E. Tractenberg et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Tractenberg, Rochelle E.
Yumoto, Futoshi
Aisen, Paul S.
Detecting When “Quality of Life” Has Been “Enhanced”: Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings
title Detecting When “Quality of Life” Has Been “Enhanced”: Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings
title_full Detecting When “Quality of Life” Has Been “Enhanced”: Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings
title_fullStr Detecting When “Quality of Life” Has Been “Enhanced”: Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings
title_full_unstemmed Detecting When “Quality of Life” Has Been “Enhanced”: Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings
title_short Detecting When “Quality of Life” Has Been “Enhanced”: Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings
title_sort detecting when “quality of life” has been “enhanced”: estimating change in quality of life ratings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213645
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.34A005
work_keys_str_mv AT tractenbergrochellee detectingwhenqualityoflifehasbeenenhancedestimatingchangeinqualityofliferatings
AT yumotofutoshi detectingwhenqualityoflifehasbeenenhancedestimatingchangeinqualityofliferatings
AT aisenpauls detectingwhenqualityoflifehasbeenenhancedestimatingchangeinqualityofliferatings