Cargando…

A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department

BACKGROUND: Recognizing the diverse presentation of neurological conditions that emergency physicians encounter can be challenging, and management of these patients often requires consultation with a neurologist. Accurate diagnosis is critical in neurological emergencies because patient outcomes are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Christopher K, Fisher, Jonathan, Joyce, Nina R, Edlow, Jonathan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26223983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0074-3
_version_ 1782382800411820032
author Hansen, Christopher K
Fisher, Jonathan
Joyce, Nina R
Edlow, Jonathan A
author_facet Hansen, Christopher K
Fisher, Jonathan
Joyce, Nina R
Edlow, Jonathan A
author_sort Hansen, Christopher K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recognizing the diverse presentation of neurological conditions that emergency physicians encounter can be challenging, and management of these patients often requires consultation with a neurologist. Accurate diagnosis is critical in neurological emergencies because patient outcomes are often dependent on timely treatment. Our primary objective was to ascertain whether consultant neurologists understood the reason for consultation in the emergency department. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective study of a non-consecutive sample of 94 patients seen in an academic tertiary care emergency department (ED) who underwent consultation by neurologist over 4 consecutive months. At the time a consult was requested, we independently surveyed the treating ED physician for their differential diagnosis. Neurologists were also queried as to whether there was a clear indication for consultation. We then followed the patients to determine their final diagnosis and outcome. RESULTS: The median age was 57 years (interquartile range 45–78). 45.7 % were male. The clinical reasons for all the consults were 61 % focal symptom, 12 % concern about a specific diagnosis, 9 % radiological finding, 9 % diagnostic ambiguity, and 11 % other. There was no significant difference in the rate of a final neurological diagnosis based on the clinical reason for consult (p = 0.13). In the 17 % of patients for whom the treating neurologist reported a lack of a clear indication for the consultation, 25 % were later admitted to a neurological service, and 69 % ultimately had a neurological diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with neurological emergencies can have diverse presentations, emergency physicians appear to utilize neurologic consultation appropriately. Additionally, nearly 70 % of patients for whom the consultant did not precisely understand the need for the consultation had neurological diagnoses. Time and resource constraints in the ED create challenges in making correct diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4514733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45147332015-07-27 A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department Hansen, Christopher K Fisher, Jonathan Joyce, Nina R Edlow, Jonathan A Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Recognizing the diverse presentation of neurological conditions that emergency physicians encounter can be challenging, and management of these patients often requires consultation with a neurologist. Accurate diagnosis is critical in neurological emergencies because patient outcomes are often dependent on timely treatment. Our primary objective was to ascertain whether consultant neurologists understood the reason for consultation in the emergency department. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective study of a non-consecutive sample of 94 patients seen in an academic tertiary care emergency department (ED) who underwent consultation by neurologist over 4 consecutive months. At the time a consult was requested, we independently surveyed the treating ED physician for their differential diagnosis. Neurologists were also queried as to whether there was a clear indication for consultation. We then followed the patients to determine their final diagnosis and outcome. RESULTS: The median age was 57 years (interquartile range 45–78). 45.7 % were male. The clinical reasons for all the consults were 61 % focal symptom, 12 % concern about a specific diagnosis, 9 % radiological finding, 9 % diagnostic ambiguity, and 11 % other. There was no significant difference in the rate of a final neurological diagnosis based on the clinical reason for consult (p = 0.13). In the 17 % of patients for whom the treating neurologist reported a lack of a clear indication for the consultation, 25 % were later admitted to a neurological service, and 69 % ultimately had a neurological diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with neurological emergencies can have diverse presentations, emergency physicians appear to utilize neurologic consultation appropriately. Additionally, nearly 70 % of patients for whom the consultant did not precisely understand the need for the consultation had neurological diagnoses. Time and resource constraints in the ED create challenges in making correct diagnosis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4514733/ /pubmed/26223983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0074-3 Text en © Hansen et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hansen, Christopher K
Fisher, Jonathan
Joyce, Nina R
Edlow, Jonathan A
A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department
title A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department
title_full A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department
title_fullStr A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department
title_short A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department
title_sort prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26223983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0074-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenchristopherk aprospectiveevaluationofindicationsforneurologicalconsultationintheemergencydepartment
AT fisherjonathan aprospectiveevaluationofindicationsforneurologicalconsultationintheemergencydepartment
AT joyceninar aprospectiveevaluationofindicationsforneurologicalconsultationintheemergencydepartment
AT edlowjonathana aprospectiveevaluationofindicationsforneurologicalconsultationintheemergencydepartment
AT hansenchristopherk prospectiveevaluationofindicationsforneurologicalconsultationintheemergencydepartment
AT fisherjonathan prospectiveevaluationofindicationsforneurologicalconsultationintheemergencydepartment
AT joyceninar prospectiveevaluationofindicationsforneurologicalconsultationintheemergencydepartment
AT edlowjonathana prospectiveevaluationofindicationsforneurologicalconsultationintheemergencydepartment