Cargando…

LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method

Accurate quantification of creatinine (Cre) is important to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Differences among various methods of Cre quantification were previously noted. This study aims to develop a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for serum Cre and compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ou, Meixian, Song, Yunxiao, Li, Shuijun, Liu, Gangyi, Jia, Jingying, Zhang, Menqi, Zhang, Haichen, Yu, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133912
_version_ 1782382802035015680
author Ou, Meixian
Song, Yunxiao
Li, Shuijun
Liu, Gangyi
Jia, Jingying
Zhang, Menqi
Zhang, Haichen
Yu, Chen
author_facet Ou, Meixian
Song, Yunxiao
Li, Shuijun
Liu, Gangyi
Jia, Jingying
Zhang, Menqi
Zhang, Haichen
Yu, Chen
author_sort Ou, Meixian
collection PubMed
description Accurate quantification of creatinine (Cre) is important to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Differences among various methods of Cre quantification were previously noted. This study aims to develop a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for serum Cre and compare this method with clinical routine methods. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on API 4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled with an Agilent 1200 liquid chromatography system. After adding isotope-labeled Cre-d3 as internal standard, serum samples were prepared via a one-step protein precipitation with methanol. The LC-MS/MS method was compared with frequently used enzymatic method and Jaffe method. This developed method, with a total run time of 3 min, had a lower limit of quantification of 4.4 μmol/L, a total imprecision of 1.15%–3.84%, and an average bias of 1.06%. No significant matrix effect, carryover, and interference were observed for the LC-MS/MS method. The reference intervals of serum Cre measured by LC-MS/MS assay were 41–79 μmol/L for adult women, and 46–101 μmol/L for adult men. Using LC-MS/MS as a reference, the enzymatic method showed an average bias of -2.1% and the Jaffe method showed a substantial average bias of 11.7%. Compared with the LC-MS/MS method, significant negative bias was observed for the enzymatic and Jaffe methods in hemolytic and lipimic samples. We developed a simple, specific, and accurate LC-MS/MS method to analyze serum Cre. Discordance existed among different methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4514740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45147402015-07-29 LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method Ou, Meixian Song, Yunxiao Li, Shuijun Liu, Gangyi Jia, Jingying Zhang, Menqi Zhang, Haichen Yu, Chen PLoS One Research Article Accurate quantification of creatinine (Cre) is important to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Differences among various methods of Cre quantification were previously noted. This study aims to develop a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for serum Cre and compare this method with clinical routine methods. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on API 4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled with an Agilent 1200 liquid chromatography system. After adding isotope-labeled Cre-d3 as internal standard, serum samples were prepared via a one-step protein precipitation with methanol. The LC-MS/MS method was compared with frequently used enzymatic method and Jaffe method. This developed method, with a total run time of 3 min, had a lower limit of quantification of 4.4 μmol/L, a total imprecision of 1.15%–3.84%, and an average bias of 1.06%. No significant matrix effect, carryover, and interference were observed for the LC-MS/MS method. The reference intervals of serum Cre measured by LC-MS/MS assay were 41–79 μmol/L for adult women, and 46–101 μmol/L for adult men. Using LC-MS/MS as a reference, the enzymatic method showed an average bias of -2.1% and the Jaffe method showed a substantial average bias of 11.7%. Compared with the LC-MS/MS method, significant negative bias was observed for the enzymatic and Jaffe methods in hemolytic and lipimic samples. We developed a simple, specific, and accurate LC-MS/MS method to analyze serum Cre. Discordance existed among different methods. Public Library of Science 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4514740/ /pubmed/26207996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133912 Text en © 2015 Ou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ou, Meixian
Song, Yunxiao
Li, Shuijun
Liu, Gangyi
Jia, Jingying
Zhang, Menqi
Zhang, Haichen
Yu, Chen
LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method
title LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method
title_full LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method
title_fullStr LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method
title_full_unstemmed LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method
title_short LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method
title_sort lc-ms/ms method for serum creatinine: comparison with enzymatic method and jaffe method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133912
work_keys_str_mv AT oumeixian lcmsmsmethodforserumcreatininecomparisonwithenzymaticmethodandjaffemethod
AT songyunxiao lcmsmsmethodforserumcreatininecomparisonwithenzymaticmethodandjaffemethod
AT lishuijun lcmsmsmethodforserumcreatininecomparisonwithenzymaticmethodandjaffemethod
AT liugangyi lcmsmsmethodforserumcreatininecomparisonwithenzymaticmethodandjaffemethod
AT jiajingying lcmsmsmethodforserumcreatininecomparisonwithenzymaticmethodandjaffemethod
AT zhangmenqi lcmsmsmethodforserumcreatininecomparisonwithenzymaticmethodandjaffemethod
AT zhanghaichen lcmsmsmethodforserumcreatininecomparisonwithenzymaticmethodandjaffemethod
AT yuchen lcmsmsmethodforserumcreatininecomparisonwithenzymaticmethodandjaffemethod