Cargando…
Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm
BACKGROUND: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) biomarkers have proven utility in tumors in evaluating microvascular perfusion and permeability, but it is unclear whether measurements made in different centers are comparable due to methodological differences. PURPOSE: To evaluate how commonly ut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130168 |
_version_ | 1782382826745757696 |
---|---|
author | Ng, Chaan S. Wei, Wei Bankson, James A. Ravoori, Murali K. Han, Lin Brammer, David W. Klumpp, Sherry Waterton, John C. Jackson, Edward F. |
author_facet | Ng, Chaan S. Wei, Wei Bankson, James A. Ravoori, Murali K. Han, Lin Brammer, David W. Klumpp, Sherry Waterton, John C. Jackson, Edward F. |
author_sort | Ng, Chaan S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) biomarkers have proven utility in tumors in evaluating microvascular perfusion and permeability, but it is unclear whether measurements made in different centers are comparable due to methodological differences. PURPOSE: To evaluate how commonly utilized analytical methods for DCE-MRI biomarkers affect both the absolute parameter values and repeatability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI was performed on three consecutive days in twelve rats bearing C6 xenografts. Endothelial transfer constant (K (trans)), extracellular extravascular space volume fraction (v (e)), and contrast agent reflux rate constant (k (ep)) measures were computed using: 2-parameter (“Tofts” or “standard Kety”) vs. 3-parameter (“General Kinetic” or “extended Kety”) compartmental models (including blood plasma volume fraction (v (p)) with 3-parameter models); individual- vs. population-based vascular input functions (VIFs); and pixel-by-pixel vs. whole tumor-ROI. Variability was evaluated by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and variance components analyses. RESULTS: DCE-MRI absolute parameter values and wCVs varied widely by analytical method. Absolute parameter values ranged, as follows, median K (trans), 0.09–0.18 min(-1); k (ep), 0.51–0.92 min(-1); v (e), 0.17–0.23; and v (p), 0.02–0.04. wCVs also varied widely by analytical method, as follows: mean K (trans), 32.9–61.9%; k (ep), 11.6–41.9%; v (e), 16.1–54.9%; and v (p), 53.9–77.2%. K (trans) and k (ep) values were lower with 3- than 2-parameter modeling (p<0.0001); k (ep) and v (p) were lower with pixel- than whole-ROI analyses (p<0.0006). wCVs were significantly smaller for v (e), and larger for k (ep), with individual- than population-based VIFs. CONCLUSIONS: DCE-MRI parameter values and repeatability can vary widely by analytical methodology. Absolute values of DCE-MRI biomarkers are unlikely to be comparable between different studies unless analyses are carefully standardized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4514853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45148532015-07-29 Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm Ng, Chaan S. Wei, Wei Bankson, James A. Ravoori, Murali K. Han, Lin Brammer, David W. Klumpp, Sherry Waterton, John C. Jackson, Edward F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) biomarkers have proven utility in tumors in evaluating microvascular perfusion and permeability, but it is unclear whether measurements made in different centers are comparable due to methodological differences. PURPOSE: To evaluate how commonly utilized analytical methods for DCE-MRI biomarkers affect both the absolute parameter values and repeatability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI was performed on three consecutive days in twelve rats bearing C6 xenografts. Endothelial transfer constant (K (trans)), extracellular extravascular space volume fraction (v (e)), and contrast agent reflux rate constant (k (ep)) measures were computed using: 2-parameter (“Tofts” or “standard Kety”) vs. 3-parameter (“General Kinetic” or “extended Kety”) compartmental models (including blood plasma volume fraction (v (p)) with 3-parameter models); individual- vs. population-based vascular input functions (VIFs); and pixel-by-pixel vs. whole tumor-ROI. Variability was evaluated by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and variance components analyses. RESULTS: DCE-MRI absolute parameter values and wCVs varied widely by analytical method. Absolute parameter values ranged, as follows, median K (trans), 0.09–0.18 min(-1); k (ep), 0.51–0.92 min(-1); v (e), 0.17–0.23; and v (p), 0.02–0.04. wCVs also varied widely by analytical method, as follows: mean K (trans), 32.9–61.9%; k (ep), 11.6–41.9%; v (e), 16.1–54.9%; and v (p), 53.9–77.2%. K (trans) and k (ep) values were lower with 3- than 2-parameter modeling (p<0.0001); k (ep) and v (p) were lower with pixel- than whole-ROI analyses (p<0.0006). wCVs were significantly smaller for v (e), and larger for k (ep), with individual- than population-based VIFs. CONCLUSIONS: DCE-MRI parameter values and repeatability can vary widely by analytical methodology. Absolute values of DCE-MRI biomarkers are unlikely to be comparable between different studies unless analyses are carefully standardized. Public Library of Science 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4514853/ /pubmed/26208254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130168 Text en © 2015 Ng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ng, Chaan S. Wei, Wei Bankson, James A. Ravoori, Murali K. Han, Lin Brammer, David W. Klumpp, Sherry Waterton, John C. Jackson, Edward F. Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm |
title | Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm |
title_full | Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm |
title_fullStr | Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm |
title_short | Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm |
title_sort | dependence of dce-mri biomarker values on analysis algorithm |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4514853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngchaans dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm AT weiwei dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm AT banksonjamesa dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm AT ravoorimuralik dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm AT hanlin dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm AT brammerdavidw dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm AT klumppsherry dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm AT watertonjohnc dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm AT jacksonedwardf dependenceofdcemribiomarkervaluesonanalysisalgorithm |