Cargando…

Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations

ABSTRACT: Internal and external interfaces in solids exhibit completely different transport properties compared to the bulk. Transport parallel to grain or phase boundaries is usually strongly enhanced. Transport perpendicular to an interface is usually blocked, i.e., transport across an interface i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korte, Carsten, Schichtel, N., Hesse, D., Janek, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26224892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00706-009-0125-7
_version_ 1782382880994885632
author Korte, Carsten
Schichtel, N.
Hesse, D.
Janek, J.
author_facet Korte, Carsten
Schichtel, N.
Hesse, D.
Janek, J.
author_sort Korte, Carsten
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Internal and external interfaces in solids exhibit completely different transport properties compared to the bulk. Transport parallel to grain or phase boundaries is usually strongly enhanced. Transport perpendicular to an interface is usually blocked, i.e., transport across an interface is often much slower. Due to the high density of interfaces in modern micro- and nanoscaled devices, a severe influence on the total transport properties can be expected. In contrast to diffusion in metal grain boundaries, transport phenomena in boundaries of ionic materials are still less understood. The specific transport properties along metal grain boundaries are explained by structural factors like packing densities or dislocation densities in the interface region. In most studies dealing with ionic materials, the interfacial transport properties are merely explained by the influence of space charge regions. In this study the influence of the interface structure on the interfacial transport properties of ionic materials is discussed in analogy to metallic materials. A qualitative model based on the density of misfit dislocations and on interfacial strain is introduced for (untilted and untwisted) phase boundaries. For experimental verification, the interfacial ionic conductivity of different multilayer systems consisting of stabilised ZrO(2) and an insulating oxide is investigated as a funtion of structural mismatch. As predicted by the model, the interfacial conductivity increases when the lattice mismatch is increased. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4515241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45152412015-07-27 Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations Korte, Carsten Schichtel, N. Hesse, D. Janek, J. Monatsh Chem Original Paper ABSTRACT: Internal and external interfaces in solids exhibit completely different transport properties compared to the bulk. Transport parallel to grain or phase boundaries is usually strongly enhanced. Transport perpendicular to an interface is usually blocked, i.e., transport across an interface is often much slower. Due to the high density of interfaces in modern micro- and nanoscaled devices, a severe influence on the total transport properties can be expected. In contrast to diffusion in metal grain boundaries, transport phenomena in boundaries of ionic materials are still less understood. The specific transport properties along metal grain boundaries are explained by structural factors like packing densities or dislocation densities in the interface region. In most studies dealing with ionic materials, the interfacial transport properties are merely explained by the influence of space charge regions. In this study the influence of the interface structure on the interfacial transport properties of ionic materials is discussed in analogy to metallic materials. A qualitative model based on the density of misfit dislocations and on interfacial strain is introduced for (untilted and untwisted) phase boundaries. For experimental verification, the interfacial ionic conductivity of different multilayer systems consisting of stabilised ZrO(2) and an insulating oxide is investigated as a funtion of structural mismatch. As predicted by the model, the interfacial conductivity increases when the lattice mismatch is increased. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Vienna 2009-03-27 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC4515241/ /pubmed/26224892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00706-009-0125-7 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2009
spellingShingle Original Paper
Korte, Carsten
Schichtel, N.
Hesse, D.
Janek, J.
Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations
title Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations
title_full Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations
title_fullStr Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations
title_full_unstemmed Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations
title_short Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations
title_sort influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: experimental studies and formal considerations
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26224892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00706-009-0125-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kortecarsten influenceofinterfacestructureonmasstransportinphaseboundariesbetweendifferentionicmaterialsexperimentalstudiesandformalconsiderations
AT schichteln influenceofinterfacestructureonmasstransportinphaseboundariesbetweendifferentionicmaterialsexperimentalstudiesandformalconsiderations
AT hessed influenceofinterfacestructureonmasstransportinphaseboundariesbetweendifferentionicmaterialsexperimentalstudiesandformalconsiderations
AT janekj influenceofinterfacestructureonmasstransportinphaseboundariesbetweendifferentionicmaterialsexperimentalstudiesandformalconsiderations