Cargando…

Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review

Background. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lal, Nikhil, Livemore, Sam, Dunne, Declan, Khan, Iftikhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972
_version_ 1782382891864424448
author Lal, Nikhil
Livemore, Sam
Dunne, Declan
Khan, Iftikhar
author_facet Lal, Nikhil
Livemore, Sam
Dunne, Declan
Khan, Iftikhar
author_sort Lal, Nikhil
collection PubMed
description Background. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these patients. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, DISCOVER, and Cochrane Library was conducted using the keywords including gastric electrical stimulation, gastroparesis, nausea, and vomiting and neuromodulation, stomach, central nervous system, gastric pacing, electrical stimulation, and gastrointestinal. Results. 1139 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. The quality of studies was variable. There was a variation in outcome measures and follow-up methodology. Included studies suggested significant reductions in symptom severity reporting over the study period, but improvements in gastric emptying time were variable and rarely correlated with symptom improvement. Conclusion. The evidence in support of gastric electrical stimulation is limited and heterogeneous in quality. While current evidence has shown a degree of efficacy in these patients, high-quality, large clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of this therapy and to identify the patients for whom this therapy is inappropriate. A consensus view on essential preoperative assessment and postoperative measurement is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4515290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45152902015-08-05 Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review Lal, Nikhil Livemore, Sam Dunne, Declan Khan, Iftikhar Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article Background. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these patients. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, DISCOVER, and Cochrane Library was conducted using the keywords including gastric electrical stimulation, gastroparesis, nausea, and vomiting and neuromodulation, stomach, central nervous system, gastric pacing, electrical stimulation, and gastrointestinal. Results. 1139 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. The quality of studies was variable. There was a variation in outcome measures and follow-up methodology. Included studies suggested significant reductions in symptom severity reporting over the study period, but improvements in gastric emptying time were variable and rarely correlated with symptom improvement. Conclusion. The evidence in support of gastric electrical stimulation is limited and heterogeneous in quality. While current evidence has shown a degree of efficacy in these patients, high-quality, large clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of this therapy and to identify the patients for whom this therapy is inappropriate. A consensus view on essential preoperative assessment and postoperative measurement is needed. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4515290/ /pubmed/26246804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972 Text en Copyright © 2015 Nikhil Lal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lal, Nikhil
Livemore, Sam
Dunne, Declan
Khan, Iftikhar
Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_full Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_short Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_sort gastric electrical stimulation with the enterra system: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972
work_keys_str_mv AT lalnikhil gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview
AT livemoresam gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview
AT dunnedeclan gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview
AT khaniftikhar gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview