Cargando…

Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes

Large sample volumes are traditionally required for the analysis of waterborne pathogens. The need for large volumes greatly limits the number of samples that can be processed. The goals of this study were to compare extraction and detection procedures for quantifying protozoan parasites and viruses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonilla, J. Alfredo, Bonilla, Tonya D., Abdelzaher, Amir M., Scott, Troy M., Lukasik, Jerzy, Solo-Gabriele, Helena M., Palmer, Carol J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707118
_version_ 1782382945880768512
author Bonilla, J. Alfredo
Bonilla, Tonya D.
Abdelzaher, Amir M.
Scott, Troy M.
Lukasik, Jerzy
Solo-Gabriele, Helena M.
Palmer, Carol J.
author_facet Bonilla, J. Alfredo
Bonilla, Tonya D.
Abdelzaher, Amir M.
Scott, Troy M.
Lukasik, Jerzy
Solo-Gabriele, Helena M.
Palmer, Carol J.
author_sort Bonilla, J. Alfredo
collection PubMed
description Large sample volumes are traditionally required for the analysis of waterborne pathogens. The need for large volumes greatly limits the number of samples that can be processed. The goals of this study were to compare extraction and detection procedures for quantifying protozoan parasites and viruses from small volumes of marine water. The intent was to evaluate a logistically simpler method of sample collection and processing that would facilitate direct pathogen measures as part of routine monitoring programs. Samples were collected simultaneously using a bilayer device with protozoa capture by size (top filter) and viruses capture by charge (bottom filter). Protozoan detection technologies utilized for recovery of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. were qPCR and the more traditional immunomagnetic separation—IFA-microscopy, while virus (poliovirus) detection was based upon qPCR versus plaque assay. Filters were eluted using reagents consistent with the downstream detection technologies. Results showed higher mean recoveries using traditional detection methods over qPCR for Cryptosporidium (91% vs. 45%) and poliovirus (67% vs. 55%) whereas for Giardia the qPCR-based methods were characterized by higher mean recoveries (41% vs. 28%). Overall mean recoveries are considered high for all detection technologies. Results suggest that simultaneous filtration may be suitable for isolating different classes of pathogens from small marine water volumes. More research is needed to evaluate the suitability of this method for detecting pathogens at low ambient concentration levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4515645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45156452015-07-28 Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes Bonilla, J. Alfredo Bonilla, Tonya D. Abdelzaher, Amir M. Scott, Troy M. Lukasik, Jerzy Solo-Gabriele, Helena M. Palmer, Carol J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Large sample volumes are traditionally required for the analysis of waterborne pathogens. The need for large volumes greatly limits the number of samples that can be processed. The goals of this study were to compare extraction and detection procedures for quantifying protozoan parasites and viruses from small volumes of marine water. The intent was to evaluate a logistically simpler method of sample collection and processing that would facilitate direct pathogen measures as part of routine monitoring programs. Samples were collected simultaneously using a bilayer device with protozoa capture by size (top filter) and viruses capture by charge (bottom filter). Protozoan detection technologies utilized for recovery of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. were qPCR and the more traditional immunomagnetic separation—IFA-microscopy, while virus (poliovirus) detection was based upon qPCR versus plaque assay. Filters were eluted using reagents consistent with the downstream detection technologies. Results showed higher mean recoveries using traditional detection methods over qPCR for Cryptosporidium (91% vs. 45%) and poliovirus (67% vs. 55%) whereas for Giardia the qPCR-based methods were characterized by higher mean recoveries (41% vs. 28%). Overall mean recoveries are considered high for all detection technologies. Results suggest that simultaneous filtration may be suitable for isolating different classes of pathogens from small marine water volumes. More research is needed to evaluate the suitability of this method for detecting pathogens at low ambient concentration levels. MDPI 2015-06-24 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4515645/ /pubmed/26114244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707118 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bonilla, J. Alfredo
Bonilla, Tonya D.
Abdelzaher, Amir M.
Scott, Troy M.
Lukasik, Jerzy
Solo-Gabriele, Helena M.
Palmer, Carol J.
Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes
title Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes
title_full Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes
title_fullStr Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes
title_short Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes
title_sort quantification of protozoa and viruses from small water volumes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707118
work_keys_str_mv AT bonillajalfredo quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes
AT bonillatonyad quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes
AT abdelzaheramirm quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes
AT scotttroym quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes
AT lukasikjerzy quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes
AT sologabrielehelenam quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes
AT palmercarolj quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes