Cargando…
Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes
Large sample volumes are traditionally required for the analysis of waterborne pathogens. The need for large volumes greatly limits the number of samples that can be processed. The goals of this study were to compare extraction and detection procedures for quantifying protozoan parasites and viruses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707118 |
_version_ | 1782382945880768512 |
---|---|
author | Bonilla, J. Alfredo Bonilla, Tonya D. Abdelzaher, Amir M. Scott, Troy M. Lukasik, Jerzy Solo-Gabriele, Helena M. Palmer, Carol J. |
author_facet | Bonilla, J. Alfredo Bonilla, Tonya D. Abdelzaher, Amir M. Scott, Troy M. Lukasik, Jerzy Solo-Gabriele, Helena M. Palmer, Carol J. |
author_sort | Bonilla, J. Alfredo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Large sample volumes are traditionally required for the analysis of waterborne pathogens. The need for large volumes greatly limits the number of samples that can be processed. The goals of this study were to compare extraction and detection procedures for quantifying protozoan parasites and viruses from small volumes of marine water. The intent was to evaluate a logistically simpler method of sample collection and processing that would facilitate direct pathogen measures as part of routine monitoring programs. Samples were collected simultaneously using a bilayer device with protozoa capture by size (top filter) and viruses capture by charge (bottom filter). Protozoan detection technologies utilized for recovery of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. were qPCR and the more traditional immunomagnetic separation—IFA-microscopy, while virus (poliovirus) detection was based upon qPCR versus plaque assay. Filters were eluted using reagents consistent with the downstream detection technologies. Results showed higher mean recoveries using traditional detection methods over qPCR for Cryptosporidium (91% vs. 45%) and poliovirus (67% vs. 55%) whereas for Giardia the qPCR-based methods were characterized by higher mean recoveries (41% vs. 28%). Overall mean recoveries are considered high for all detection technologies. Results suggest that simultaneous filtration may be suitable for isolating different classes of pathogens from small marine water volumes. More research is needed to evaluate the suitability of this method for detecting pathogens at low ambient concentration levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4515645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45156452015-07-28 Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes Bonilla, J. Alfredo Bonilla, Tonya D. Abdelzaher, Amir M. Scott, Troy M. Lukasik, Jerzy Solo-Gabriele, Helena M. Palmer, Carol J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Large sample volumes are traditionally required for the analysis of waterborne pathogens. The need for large volumes greatly limits the number of samples that can be processed. The goals of this study were to compare extraction and detection procedures for quantifying protozoan parasites and viruses from small volumes of marine water. The intent was to evaluate a logistically simpler method of sample collection and processing that would facilitate direct pathogen measures as part of routine monitoring programs. Samples were collected simultaneously using a bilayer device with protozoa capture by size (top filter) and viruses capture by charge (bottom filter). Protozoan detection technologies utilized for recovery of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. were qPCR and the more traditional immunomagnetic separation—IFA-microscopy, while virus (poliovirus) detection was based upon qPCR versus plaque assay. Filters were eluted using reagents consistent with the downstream detection technologies. Results showed higher mean recoveries using traditional detection methods over qPCR for Cryptosporidium (91% vs. 45%) and poliovirus (67% vs. 55%) whereas for Giardia the qPCR-based methods were characterized by higher mean recoveries (41% vs. 28%). Overall mean recoveries are considered high for all detection technologies. Results suggest that simultaneous filtration may be suitable for isolating different classes of pathogens from small marine water volumes. More research is needed to evaluate the suitability of this method for detecting pathogens at low ambient concentration levels. MDPI 2015-06-24 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4515645/ /pubmed/26114244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707118 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bonilla, J. Alfredo Bonilla, Tonya D. Abdelzaher, Amir M. Scott, Troy M. Lukasik, Jerzy Solo-Gabriele, Helena M. Palmer, Carol J. Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes |
title | Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes |
title_full | Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes |
title_fullStr | Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes |
title_short | Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes |
title_sort | quantification of protozoa and viruses from small water volumes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonillajalfredo quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes AT bonillatonyad quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes AT abdelzaheramirm quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes AT scotttroym quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes AT lukasikjerzy quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes AT sologabrielehelenam quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes AT palmercarolj quantificationofprotozoaandvirusesfromsmallwatervolumes |