Cargando…

Breastfeeding Rates and Growth Charts—the Zhejiang Infant Feeding Trial

A randomised control trial was undertaken in Hangzhou, China, to study the influence of the growth chart used on breastfeeding rates. Mothers with infants who were being fully breastfed at 6 weeks after birth (n = 1602) were invited to participate in the trial; 1415 agreed to participate and 1295 co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Bingquan, Zhang, Jian, Qiu, Liqian, Binns, Colin, Shao, Jie, Zhao, Yun, Zhao, Zhengyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26133126
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707337
_version_ 1782382949094653952
author Zhu, Bingquan
Zhang, Jian
Qiu, Liqian
Binns, Colin
Shao, Jie
Zhao, Yun
Zhao, Zhengyan
author_facet Zhu, Bingquan
Zhang, Jian
Qiu, Liqian
Binns, Colin
Shao, Jie
Zhao, Yun
Zhao, Zhengyan
author_sort Zhu, Bingquan
collection PubMed
description A randomised control trial was undertaken in Hangzhou, China, to study the influence of the growth chart used on breastfeeding rates. Mothers with infants who were being fully breastfed at 6 weeks after birth (n = 1602) were invited to participate in the trial; 1415 agreed to participate and 1295 completed the study. Two growth charts were used, one that was heavier for the first six months of life (Chart A, n = 686) and a lighter growth chart (Chart B, n = 609). Mothers were interviewed and infants measured at 6 weeks and 3, 4, 5 and 6 months after delivery. At 6 months the full breastfeeding rates were 18.1% in the group using the heavier growth chart compared to 22.8% in the lighter growth chart group. After adjusting for potential confounders this difference remained significant (aOR 1.41, 95% confidence intervals 1.02, 1.93). These results suggest that breastfeeding rates may be influenced by the type of growth chart used. Mothers who perceive that their infants are not growing adequately (i.e., using the heavier charts) may introduce other foods to their infants earlier than mothers using the lighter chart. While a larger trial is required to confirm the results, in the interim it is suggested that if heavier growth charts are used, a lower percentile line could be used to assess adequacy of growth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4515659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45156592015-07-28 Breastfeeding Rates and Growth Charts—the Zhejiang Infant Feeding Trial Zhu, Bingquan Zhang, Jian Qiu, Liqian Binns, Colin Shao, Jie Zhao, Yun Zhao, Zhengyan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article A randomised control trial was undertaken in Hangzhou, China, to study the influence of the growth chart used on breastfeeding rates. Mothers with infants who were being fully breastfed at 6 weeks after birth (n = 1602) were invited to participate in the trial; 1415 agreed to participate and 1295 completed the study. Two growth charts were used, one that was heavier for the first six months of life (Chart A, n = 686) and a lighter growth chart (Chart B, n = 609). Mothers were interviewed and infants measured at 6 weeks and 3, 4, 5 and 6 months after delivery. At 6 months the full breastfeeding rates were 18.1% in the group using the heavier growth chart compared to 22.8% in the lighter growth chart group. After adjusting for potential confounders this difference remained significant (aOR 1.41, 95% confidence intervals 1.02, 1.93). These results suggest that breastfeeding rates may be influenced by the type of growth chart used. Mothers who perceive that their infants are not growing adequately (i.e., using the heavier charts) may introduce other foods to their infants earlier than mothers using the lighter chart. While a larger trial is required to confirm the results, in the interim it is suggested that if heavier growth charts are used, a lower percentile line could be used to assess adequacy of growth. MDPI 2015-06-30 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4515659/ /pubmed/26133126 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707337 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhu, Bingquan
Zhang, Jian
Qiu, Liqian
Binns, Colin
Shao, Jie
Zhao, Yun
Zhao, Zhengyan
Breastfeeding Rates and Growth Charts—the Zhejiang Infant Feeding Trial
title Breastfeeding Rates and Growth Charts—the Zhejiang Infant Feeding Trial
title_full Breastfeeding Rates and Growth Charts—the Zhejiang Infant Feeding Trial
title_fullStr Breastfeeding Rates and Growth Charts—the Zhejiang Infant Feeding Trial
title_full_unstemmed Breastfeeding Rates and Growth Charts—the Zhejiang Infant Feeding Trial
title_short Breastfeeding Rates and Growth Charts—the Zhejiang Infant Feeding Trial
title_sort breastfeeding rates and growth charts—the zhejiang infant feeding trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26133126
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707337
work_keys_str_mv AT zhubingquan breastfeedingratesandgrowthchartsthezhejianginfantfeedingtrial
AT zhangjian breastfeedingratesandgrowthchartsthezhejianginfantfeedingtrial
AT qiuliqian breastfeedingratesandgrowthchartsthezhejianginfantfeedingtrial
AT binnscolin breastfeedingratesandgrowthchartsthezhejianginfantfeedingtrial
AT shaojie breastfeedingratesandgrowthchartsthezhejianginfantfeedingtrial
AT zhaoyun breastfeedingratesandgrowthchartsthezhejianginfantfeedingtrial
AT zhaozhengyan breastfeedingratesandgrowthchartsthezhejianginfantfeedingtrial