Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study

BACKGROUND: To compare the microtensile bond strength of resin cements to enamel and dentin and to determine the type of bond failure using stereomicroscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study 40 teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and divided into two main groups i.e., Group A for ename...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumari, R Veena, Poluri, Ramya Krishna, Nagaraj, Hema, Siddaruju, Kishore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225104
_version_ 1782383012686594048
author Kumari, R Veena
Poluri, Ramya Krishna
Nagaraj, Hema
Siddaruju, Kishore
author_facet Kumari, R Veena
Poluri, Ramya Krishna
Nagaraj, Hema
Siddaruju, Kishore
author_sort Kumari, R Veena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the microtensile bond strength of resin cements to enamel and dentin and to determine the type of bond failure using stereomicroscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study 40 teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and divided into two main groups i.e., Group A for enamel and Group B for dentin. Each group is again subdivided into four subgroups, which are as follows; Subgroup 1 for Calibra resin cement, Subgroup 2 for Paracem, Subgroup 3 for Variolink II and Subgroup 4 for Rely X ARC. These resin cements were applied on enamel and dentin according to manufacturer’s instructions followed by incremental build-up of composite resin on the top of resin cements. Each tooth was sectioned perpendicular to the resin-substrate interface with a slow speed diamond saw under water cooling yielding sections of approximately 1 mm(2). On an average, three sections from each tooth were used for testing. The beams obtained after sectioning were stressed to failure under tension in a custom made stainless steel forceps held in a universal testing machine (Lloyd) at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Results were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, independent t-test, and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test. RESULTS: Cements bonded to enamel substrates showed higher mean bond strength compared to dentin, which is statistically significant. Rely X ARC showed highest mean bond strength to both the substrates. CONCLUSION: There was a significant difference between the bond strength to enamel and dentin and, Rely X ARC resin cement showed higher bond strength compared with the other groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4516081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45160812015-07-29 Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study Kumari, R Veena Poluri, Ramya Krishna Nagaraj, Hema Siddaruju, Kishore J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: To compare the microtensile bond strength of resin cements to enamel and dentin and to determine the type of bond failure using stereomicroscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study 40 teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and divided into two main groups i.e., Group A for enamel and Group B for dentin. Each group is again subdivided into four subgroups, which are as follows; Subgroup 1 for Calibra resin cement, Subgroup 2 for Paracem, Subgroup 3 for Variolink II and Subgroup 4 for Rely X ARC. These resin cements were applied on enamel and dentin according to manufacturer’s instructions followed by incremental build-up of composite resin on the top of resin cements. Each tooth was sectioned perpendicular to the resin-substrate interface with a slow speed diamond saw under water cooling yielding sections of approximately 1 mm(2). On an average, three sections from each tooth were used for testing. The beams obtained after sectioning were stressed to failure under tension in a custom made stainless steel forceps held in a universal testing machine (Lloyd) at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Results were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, independent t-test, and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test. RESULTS: Cements bonded to enamel substrates showed higher mean bond strength compared to dentin, which is statistically significant. Rely X ARC showed highest mean bond strength to both the substrates. CONCLUSION: There was a significant difference between the bond strength to enamel and dentin and, Rely X ARC resin cement showed higher bond strength compared with the other groups. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4516081/ /pubmed/26225104 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kumari, R Veena
Poluri, Ramya Krishna
Nagaraj, Hema
Siddaruju, Kishore
Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of bond strength of dual-cured resin cements: an in-vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225104
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarirveena comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofdualcuredresincementsaninvitrostudy
AT poluriramyakrishna comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofdualcuredresincementsaninvitrostudy
AT nagarajhema comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofdualcuredresincementsaninvitrostudy
AT siddarujukishore comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofdualcuredresincementsaninvitrostudy