Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study
BACKGROUND: To compare the microtensile bond strength of resin cements to enamel and dentin and to determine the type of bond failure using stereomicroscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study 40 teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and divided into two main groups i.e., Group A for ename...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225104 |
_version_ | 1782383012686594048 |
---|---|
author | Kumari, R Veena Poluri, Ramya Krishna Nagaraj, Hema Siddaruju, Kishore |
author_facet | Kumari, R Veena Poluri, Ramya Krishna Nagaraj, Hema Siddaruju, Kishore |
author_sort | Kumari, R Veena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the microtensile bond strength of resin cements to enamel and dentin and to determine the type of bond failure using stereomicroscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study 40 teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and divided into two main groups i.e., Group A for enamel and Group B for dentin. Each group is again subdivided into four subgroups, which are as follows; Subgroup 1 for Calibra resin cement, Subgroup 2 for Paracem, Subgroup 3 for Variolink II and Subgroup 4 for Rely X ARC. These resin cements were applied on enamel and dentin according to manufacturer’s instructions followed by incremental build-up of composite resin on the top of resin cements. Each tooth was sectioned perpendicular to the resin-substrate interface with a slow speed diamond saw under water cooling yielding sections of approximately 1 mm(2). On an average, three sections from each tooth were used for testing. The beams obtained after sectioning were stressed to failure under tension in a custom made stainless steel forceps held in a universal testing machine (Lloyd) at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Results were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, independent t-test, and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test. RESULTS: Cements bonded to enamel substrates showed higher mean bond strength compared to dentin, which is statistically significant. Rely X ARC showed highest mean bond strength to both the substrates. CONCLUSION: There was a significant difference between the bond strength to enamel and dentin and, Rely X ARC resin cement showed higher bond strength compared with the other groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4516081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45160812015-07-29 Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study Kumari, R Veena Poluri, Ramya Krishna Nagaraj, Hema Siddaruju, Kishore J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: To compare the microtensile bond strength of resin cements to enamel and dentin and to determine the type of bond failure using stereomicroscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study 40 teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and divided into two main groups i.e., Group A for enamel and Group B for dentin. Each group is again subdivided into four subgroups, which are as follows; Subgroup 1 for Calibra resin cement, Subgroup 2 for Paracem, Subgroup 3 for Variolink II and Subgroup 4 for Rely X ARC. These resin cements were applied on enamel and dentin according to manufacturer’s instructions followed by incremental build-up of composite resin on the top of resin cements. Each tooth was sectioned perpendicular to the resin-substrate interface with a slow speed diamond saw under water cooling yielding sections of approximately 1 mm(2). On an average, three sections from each tooth were used for testing. The beams obtained after sectioning were stressed to failure under tension in a custom made stainless steel forceps held in a universal testing machine (Lloyd) at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Results were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, independent t-test, and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test. RESULTS: Cements bonded to enamel substrates showed higher mean bond strength compared to dentin, which is statistically significant. Rely X ARC showed highest mean bond strength to both the substrates. CONCLUSION: There was a significant difference between the bond strength to enamel and dentin and, Rely X ARC resin cement showed higher bond strength compared with the other groups. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4516081/ /pubmed/26225104 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kumari, R Veena Poluri, Ramya Krishna Nagaraj, Hema Siddaruju, Kishore Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of bond strength of dual-cured resin cements: an in-vitro study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarirveena comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofdualcuredresincementsaninvitrostudy AT poluriramyakrishna comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofdualcuredresincementsaninvitrostudy AT nagarajhema comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofdualcuredresincementsaninvitrostudy AT siddarujukishore comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofdualcuredresincementsaninvitrostudy |