Cargando…

Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia

PURPOSE: It has been shown that the biggest dissatisfier for uncomplicated cataract surgery patients is pseudophakic dysphotopsia (PD). While edge design of an intraocular lens (IOL) impacts this problem, refractive index is still controversial as to its impact. This retrospective cohort study was d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radmall, Bryce R, Floyd, Anne, Oakey, Zack, Olson, Randall J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229427
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S86980
_version_ 1782383029709176832
author Radmall, Bryce R
Floyd, Anne
Oakey, Zack
Olson, Randall J
author_facet Radmall, Bryce R
Floyd, Anne
Oakey, Zack
Olson, Randall J
author_sort Radmall, Bryce R
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: It has been shown that the biggest dissatisfier for uncomplicated cataract surgery patients is pseudophakic dysphotopsia (PD). While edge design of an intraocular lens (IOL) impacts this problem, refractive index is still controversial as to its impact. This retrospective cohort study was designed to determine the role of increasing refractive index in PD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted at the John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, USA. A retrospective chart review identified patients who received one of two hydrophobic acrylic single piece IOLs (AcrySof WF SP [SN60WF] or Tecnis SP [ZCB00]), which differed mainly by refractive index (1.55 versus 1.47). Eighty-seven patients who had received implantation of a one-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL were enrolled. Patients were included if the surgery had been uncomplicated and took place at least a year before study participation. All eligible patients had 20/20 best corrected vision, without any disease known to impact visual quality. In addition to conducting a record review, the enrolled patients were surveyed for PD, using a modified National Eye Institute Visual Function questionnaire, as well as for overall satisfaction with visual quality. RESULTS: Statistical analysis demonstrated no difference between the two cohorts regarding PD, general visual function, and overall visual satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that with the two IOLs assessed, increasing the refractive index does not increase incidence of PD or decrease overall visual satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4516203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45162032015-07-30 Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia Radmall, Bryce R Floyd, Anne Oakey, Zack Olson, Randall J Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: It has been shown that the biggest dissatisfier for uncomplicated cataract surgery patients is pseudophakic dysphotopsia (PD). While edge design of an intraocular lens (IOL) impacts this problem, refractive index is still controversial as to its impact. This retrospective cohort study was designed to determine the role of increasing refractive index in PD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted at the John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, USA. A retrospective chart review identified patients who received one of two hydrophobic acrylic single piece IOLs (AcrySof WF SP [SN60WF] or Tecnis SP [ZCB00]), which differed mainly by refractive index (1.55 versus 1.47). Eighty-seven patients who had received implantation of a one-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL were enrolled. Patients were included if the surgery had been uncomplicated and took place at least a year before study participation. All eligible patients had 20/20 best corrected vision, without any disease known to impact visual quality. In addition to conducting a record review, the enrolled patients were surveyed for PD, using a modified National Eye Institute Visual Function questionnaire, as well as for overall satisfaction with visual quality. RESULTS: Statistical analysis demonstrated no difference between the two cohorts regarding PD, general visual function, and overall visual satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that with the two IOLs assessed, increasing the refractive index does not increase incidence of PD or decrease overall visual satisfaction. Dove Medical Press 2015-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4516203/ /pubmed/26229427 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S86980 Text en © 2015 Radmall et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Radmall, Bryce R
Floyd, Anne
Oakey, Zack
Olson, Randall J
Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia
title Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia
title_full Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia
title_fullStr Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia
title_full_unstemmed Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia
title_short Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia
title_sort refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229427
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S86980
work_keys_str_mv AT radmallbrycer refractiveindexanditsimpactonpseudophakicdysphotopsia
AT floydanne refractiveindexanditsimpactonpseudophakicdysphotopsia
AT oakeyzack refractiveindexanditsimpactonpseudophakicdysphotopsia
AT olsonrandallj refractiveindexanditsimpactonpseudophakicdysphotopsia