Cargando…

Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change

Identifying suitable genetic stock for restoration often employs a ‘best guess’ approach. Without adaptive variation studies, restoration may be misguided. We test the extent to which climate in central US grasslands exerts selection pressure on a foundation grass big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Loretta C, Olsen, Jacob T, Tetreault, Hannah, DeLaCruz, Angel, Bryant, Johnny, Morgan, Theodore J, Knapp, Mary, Bello, Nora M, Baer, Sara G, Maricle, Brian R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26240607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12281
_version_ 1782383063085350912
author Johnson, Loretta C
Olsen, Jacob T
Tetreault, Hannah
DeLaCruz, Angel
Bryant, Johnny
Morgan, Theodore J
Knapp, Mary
Bello, Nora M
Baer, Sara G
Maricle, Brian R
author_facet Johnson, Loretta C
Olsen, Jacob T
Tetreault, Hannah
DeLaCruz, Angel
Bryant, Johnny
Morgan, Theodore J
Knapp, Mary
Bello, Nora M
Baer, Sara G
Maricle, Brian R
author_sort Johnson, Loretta C
collection PubMed
description Identifying suitable genetic stock for restoration often employs a ‘best guess’ approach. Without adaptive variation studies, restoration may be misguided. We test the extent to which climate in central US grasslands exerts selection pressure on a foundation grass big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), widely used in restorations, and resulting in local adaptation. We seeded three regional ecotypes of A. gerardii in reciprocal transplant garden communities across 1150 km precipitation gradient. We measured ecological responses over several timescales (instantaneous gas exchange, medium-term chlorophyll absorbance, and long-term responses of establishment and cover) in response to climate and biotic factors and tested if ecotypes could expand range. The ecotype from the driest region exhibited greatest cover under low rainfall, suggesting local adaptation under abiotic stress. Unexpectedly, no evidence for cover differences between ecotypes exists at mesic sites where establishment and cover of all ecotypes were low, perhaps due to strong biotic pressures. Expression of adaptive differences is strongly environment specific. Given observed adaptive variation, the most conservative restoration strategy would be to plant the local ecotype, especially in drier locations. With superior performance of the most xeric ecotype under dry conditions and predicted drought, this ecotype may migrate eastward, naturally or with assistance in restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4516422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45164222015-08-03 Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change Johnson, Loretta C Olsen, Jacob T Tetreault, Hannah DeLaCruz, Angel Bryant, Johnny Morgan, Theodore J Knapp, Mary Bello, Nora M Baer, Sara G Maricle, Brian R Evol Appl Original Articles Identifying suitable genetic stock for restoration often employs a ‘best guess’ approach. Without adaptive variation studies, restoration may be misguided. We test the extent to which climate in central US grasslands exerts selection pressure on a foundation grass big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), widely used in restorations, and resulting in local adaptation. We seeded three regional ecotypes of A. gerardii in reciprocal transplant garden communities across 1150 km precipitation gradient. We measured ecological responses over several timescales (instantaneous gas exchange, medium-term chlorophyll absorbance, and long-term responses of establishment and cover) in response to climate and biotic factors and tested if ecotypes could expand range. The ecotype from the driest region exhibited greatest cover under low rainfall, suggesting local adaptation under abiotic stress. Unexpectedly, no evidence for cover differences between ecotypes exists at mesic sites where establishment and cover of all ecotypes were low, perhaps due to strong biotic pressures. Expression of adaptive differences is strongly environment specific. Given observed adaptive variation, the most conservative restoration strategy would be to plant the local ecotype, especially in drier locations. With superior performance of the most xeric ecotype under dry conditions and predicted drought, this ecotype may migrate eastward, naturally or with assistance in restorations. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-08 2015-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4516422/ /pubmed/26240607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12281 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Johnson, Loretta C
Olsen, Jacob T
Tetreault, Hannah
DeLaCruz, Angel
Bryant, Johnny
Morgan, Theodore J
Knapp, Mary
Bello, Nora M
Baer, Sara G
Maricle, Brian R
Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change
title Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change
title_full Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change
title_fullStr Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change
title_full_unstemmed Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change
title_short Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change
title_sort intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a us great plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26240607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12281
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonlorettac intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT olsenjacobt intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT tetreaulthannah intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT delacruzangel intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT bryantjohnny intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT morgantheodorej intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT knappmary intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT bellonoram intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT baersarag intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange
AT mariclebrianr intraspecificvariationofadominantgrassandlocaladaptationinreciprocalgardencommunitiesalongausgreatplainsprecipitationgradientimplicationsforgrasslandrestorationwithclimatechange