Cargando…
Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction
Study Design In vitro testing. Objective To determine whether long cervical and cervicothoracic fusions increase the intradiscal pressure at the adjacent caudal disk and to determine which thoracic end vertebra causes the least increase in the adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. Methods A bending m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546418 |
_version_ | 1782383089927847936 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Ivan Sundberg, Eric B. Iezza, Alex Lindsey, Derek P. Riew, K. Daniel |
author_facet | Cheng, Ivan Sundberg, Eric B. Iezza, Alex Lindsey, Derek P. Riew, K. Daniel |
author_sort | Cheng, Ivan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Study Design In vitro testing. Objective To determine whether long cervical and cervicothoracic fusions increase the intradiscal pressure at the adjacent caudal disk and to determine which thoracic end vertebra causes the least increase in the adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. Methods A bending moment was applied to six cadaveric cervicothoracic spine specimens with intact rib cages. Intradiscal pressures were recorded from C7–T1 to T9–10 before and after simulated fusion by anterior cervical plating and posterior thoracic pedicle screw constructs. The changes in the intradiscal pressure from baseline were calculated and compared. Results No significant differences where found when the changes of the juxtafusion intradiscal pressure at each level were compared for the flexion, extension, and left and right bending simulations. However, combining the pressures for all directions of bending at each level demonstrated a decrease in the pressures at the T2–T3 level. Exploratory analysis comparing changes in the pressure at T2–T3 to other levels showed a significant decrease in the pressures at this level (p = 0.005). Conclusions Based on the combined intradiscal pressures alone it may be advantageous to end long constructs spanning the cervicothoracic junction at the T2 level if there are no other mitigating factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4516757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45167572015-08-01 Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction Cheng, Ivan Sundberg, Eric B. Iezza, Alex Lindsey, Derek P. Riew, K. Daniel Global Spine J Article Study Design In vitro testing. Objective To determine whether long cervical and cervicothoracic fusions increase the intradiscal pressure at the adjacent caudal disk and to determine which thoracic end vertebra causes the least increase in the adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. Methods A bending moment was applied to six cadaveric cervicothoracic spine specimens with intact rib cages. Intradiscal pressures were recorded from C7–T1 to T9–10 before and after simulated fusion by anterior cervical plating and posterior thoracic pedicle screw constructs. The changes in the intradiscal pressure from baseline were calculated and compared. Results No significant differences where found when the changes of the juxtafusion intradiscal pressure at each level were compared for the flexion, extension, and left and right bending simulations. However, combining the pressures for all directions of bending at each level demonstrated a decrease in the pressures at the T2–T3 level. Exploratory analysis comparing changes in the pressure at T2–T3 to other levels showed a significant decrease in the pressures at this level (p = 0.005). Conclusions Based on the combined intradiscal pressures alone it may be advantageous to end long constructs spanning the cervicothoracic junction at the T2 level if there are no other mitigating factors. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-02-11 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4516757/ /pubmed/26225276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546418 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Cheng, Ivan Sundberg, Eric B. Iezza, Alex Lindsey, Derek P. Riew, K. Daniel Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction |
title | Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction |
title_full | Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction |
title_short | Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction |
title_sort | biomechanical determination of distal level for fusions across the cervicothoracic junction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengivan biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction AT sundbergericb biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction AT iezzaalex biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction AT lindseyderekp biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction AT riewkdaniel biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction |