Cargando…

Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction

Study Design In vitro testing. Objective To determine whether long cervical and cervicothoracic fusions increase the intradiscal pressure at the adjacent caudal disk and to determine which thoracic end vertebra causes the least increase in the adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. Methods A bending m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Ivan, Sundberg, Eric B., Iezza, Alex, Lindsey, Derek P., Riew, K. Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546418
_version_ 1782383089927847936
author Cheng, Ivan
Sundberg, Eric B.
Iezza, Alex
Lindsey, Derek P.
Riew, K. Daniel
author_facet Cheng, Ivan
Sundberg, Eric B.
Iezza, Alex
Lindsey, Derek P.
Riew, K. Daniel
author_sort Cheng, Ivan
collection PubMed
description Study Design In vitro testing. Objective To determine whether long cervical and cervicothoracic fusions increase the intradiscal pressure at the adjacent caudal disk and to determine which thoracic end vertebra causes the least increase in the adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. Methods A bending moment was applied to six cadaveric cervicothoracic spine specimens with intact rib cages. Intradiscal pressures were recorded from C7–T1 to T9–10 before and after simulated fusion by anterior cervical plating and posterior thoracic pedicle screw constructs. The changes in the intradiscal pressure from baseline were calculated and compared. Results No significant differences where found when the changes of the juxtafusion intradiscal pressure at each level were compared for the flexion, extension, and left and right bending simulations. However, combining the pressures for all directions of bending at each level demonstrated a decrease in the pressures at the T2–T3 level. Exploratory analysis comparing changes in the pressure at T2–T3 to other levels showed a significant decrease in the pressures at this level (p = 0.005). Conclusions Based on the combined intradiscal pressures alone it may be advantageous to end long constructs spanning the cervicothoracic junction at the T2 level if there are no other mitigating factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4516757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45167572015-08-01 Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction Cheng, Ivan Sundberg, Eric B. Iezza, Alex Lindsey, Derek P. Riew, K. Daniel Global Spine J Article Study Design In vitro testing. Objective To determine whether long cervical and cervicothoracic fusions increase the intradiscal pressure at the adjacent caudal disk and to determine which thoracic end vertebra causes the least increase in the adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. Methods A bending moment was applied to six cadaveric cervicothoracic spine specimens with intact rib cages. Intradiscal pressures were recorded from C7–T1 to T9–10 before and after simulated fusion by anterior cervical plating and posterior thoracic pedicle screw constructs. The changes in the intradiscal pressure from baseline were calculated and compared. Results No significant differences where found when the changes of the juxtafusion intradiscal pressure at each level were compared for the flexion, extension, and left and right bending simulations. However, combining the pressures for all directions of bending at each level demonstrated a decrease in the pressures at the T2–T3 level. Exploratory analysis comparing changes in the pressure at T2–T3 to other levels showed a significant decrease in the pressures at this level (p = 0.005). Conclusions Based on the combined intradiscal pressures alone it may be advantageous to end long constructs spanning the cervicothoracic junction at the T2 level if there are no other mitigating factors. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-02-11 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4516757/ /pubmed/26225276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546418 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Cheng, Ivan
Sundberg, Eric B.
Iezza, Alex
Lindsey, Derek P.
Riew, K. Daniel
Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction
title Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction
title_full Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction
title_fullStr Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction
title_short Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction
title_sort biomechanical determination of distal level for fusions across the cervicothoracic junction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546418
work_keys_str_mv AT chengivan biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction
AT sundbergericb biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction
AT iezzaalex biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction
AT lindseyderekp biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction
AT riewkdaniel biomechanicaldeterminationofdistallevelforfusionsacrossthecervicothoracicjunction