Cargando…

Assessing the function of STAS domain protein SypA in Vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis

Colonization of the squid Euprymna scolopes by Vibrio fischeri requires biofilm formation dependent on the 18-gene symbiosis polysaccharide locus, syp. One key regulator, SypA, controls biofilm formation by an as-yet unknown mechanism; however, it is known that SypA itself is regulated by SypE. Biof...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Cecilia M., Visick, Karen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26284045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00760
_version_ 1782383190479994880
author Thompson, Cecilia M.
Visick, Karen L.
author_facet Thompson, Cecilia M.
Visick, Karen L.
author_sort Thompson, Cecilia M.
collection PubMed
description Colonization of the squid Euprymna scolopes by Vibrio fischeri requires biofilm formation dependent on the 18-gene symbiosis polysaccharide locus, syp. One key regulator, SypA, controls biofilm formation by an as-yet unknown mechanism; however, it is known that SypA itself is regulated by SypE. Biofilm-proficient strains form wrinkled colonies on solid media, while sypA mutants form biofilm-defective smooth colonies. To begin to understand the function of SypA, we used comparative analyses and mutagenesis approaches. sypA (and the syp locus) is conserved in other Vibrios, including two food-borne human pathogens, Vibrio vulnificus (rbdA) and Vibrio parahaemolyticus (sypA(VP)). We found that both homologs could complement the biofilm defect of the V. fischeri sypA mutant, but their phenotypes varied depending on the biofilm-inducing conditions used. Furthermore, while SypA(VP) retained an ability to be regulated by SypE, RbdA was resistant to this control. To better understand SypA function, we examined the biofilm-promoting ability of a number of mutant SypA proteins with substitutions in conserved residues, and found many that were biofilm-defective. The most severe biofilm-defective phenotypes occurred when changes were made to a conserved stretch of amino acids within a predicted α-helix of SypA; we hypothesize that this region of SypA may interact with another protein to promote biofilm formation. Finally, we identified a residue required for negative control by SypE. Together, our data provide insights into the function of this key biofilm regulator and suggest that the SypA orthologs may play similar roles in their native Vibrio species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4517449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45174492015-08-17 Assessing the function of STAS domain protein SypA in Vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis Thompson, Cecilia M. Visick, Karen L. Front Microbiol Microbiology Colonization of the squid Euprymna scolopes by Vibrio fischeri requires biofilm formation dependent on the 18-gene symbiosis polysaccharide locus, syp. One key regulator, SypA, controls biofilm formation by an as-yet unknown mechanism; however, it is known that SypA itself is regulated by SypE. Biofilm-proficient strains form wrinkled colonies on solid media, while sypA mutants form biofilm-defective smooth colonies. To begin to understand the function of SypA, we used comparative analyses and mutagenesis approaches. sypA (and the syp locus) is conserved in other Vibrios, including two food-borne human pathogens, Vibrio vulnificus (rbdA) and Vibrio parahaemolyticus (sypA(VP)). We found that both homologs could complement the biofilm defect of the V. fischeri sypA mutant, but their phenotypes varied depending on the biofilm-inducing conditions used. Furthermore, while SypA(VP) retained an ability to be regulated by SypE, RbdA was resistant to this control. To better understand SypA function, we examined the biofilm-promoting ability of a number of mutant SypA proteins with substitutions in conserved residues, and found many that were biofilm-defective. The most severe biofilm-defective phenotypes occurred when changes were made to a conserved stretch of amino acids within a predicted α-helix of SypA; we hypothesize that this region of SypA may interact with another protein to promote biofilm formation. Finally, we identified a residue required for negative control by SypE. Together, our data provide insights into the function of this key biofilm regulator and suggest that the SypA orthologs may play similar roles in their native Vibrio species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4517449/ /pubmed/26284045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00760 Text en Copyright © 2015 Thompson and Visick. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Thompson, Cecilia M.
Visick, Karen L.
Assessing the function of STAS domain protein SypA in Vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis
title Assessing the function of STAS domain protein SypA in Vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis
title_full Assessing the function of STAS domain protein SypA in Vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis
title_fullStr Assessing the function of STAS domain protein SypA in Vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the function of STAS domain protein SypA in Vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis
title_short Assessing the function of STAS domain protein SypA in Vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis
title_sort assessing the function of stas domain protein sypa in vibrio fischeri using a comparative analysis
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26284045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00760
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonceciliam assessingthefunctionofstasdomainproteinsypainvibriofischeriusingacomparativeanalysis
AT visickkarenl assessingthefunctionofstasdomainproteinsypainvibriofischeriusingacomparativeanalysis