Cargando…

Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy

Systemic allergic reactions to insect stings affect up to 5% of the population during their lifetime, and up to 32% of beekeepers. Such reactions can be fatal, albeit very rarely, and fear of a further systemic reaction (SR) can lead to significant anxiety and quality of life impairment. A recent Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ludman, Sian W, Boyle, Robert J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229493
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S62288
_version_ 1782383200497041408
author Ludman, Sian W
Boyle, Robert J
author_facet Ludman, Sian W
Boyle, Robert J
author_sort Ludman, Sian W
collection PubMed
description Systemic allergic reactions to insect stings affect up to 5% of the population during their lifetime, and up to 32% of beekeepers. Such reactions can be fatal, albeit very rarely, and fear of a further systemic reaction (SR) can lead to significant anxiety and quality of life impairment. A recent Cochrane systematic review confirmed that venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an effective treatment for people who have had a systemic allergic reaction to an insect sting. VIT reduces risk of a further SR (relative risk 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.28), but VIT also reduces risk of a future large local reaction, and significantly improves disease-specific quality of life. However, health economic analysis showed that VIT is generally not cost effective for preventing future SRs; most people are stung infrequently, most SRs resolve without long-term consequences, and a fatal outcome is extremely rare. VIT only becomes cost effective if one is stung frequently (eg, beekeepers) or if quality of life improvement is considered. Thus, for most people with insect sting allergy, anxiety and quality of life impairment should be the overriding consideration when making treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of a patient-centered approach. Areas which need to be explored in future research include efforts to improve the safety and convenience of VIT such as the use of sublingual immunotherapy; quality of life effects of venom allergy in children and adolescents as well as their parents; and the optimal duration of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4517515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45175152015-07-30 Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy Ludman, Sian W Boyle, Robert J J Asthma Allergy Review Systemic allergic reactions to insect stings affect up to 5% of the population during their lifetime, and up to 32% of beekeepers. Such reactions can be fatal, albeit very rarely, and fear of a further systemic reaction (SR) can lead to significant anxiety and quality of life impairment. A recent Cochrane systematic review confirmed that venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an effective treatment for people who have had a systemic allergic reaction to an insect sting. VIT reduces risk of a further SR (relative risk 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.28), but VIT also reduces risk of a future large local reaction, and significantly improves disease-specific quality of life. However, health economic analysis showed that VIT is generally not cost effective for preventing future SRs; most people are stung infrequently, most SRs resolve without long-term consequences, and a fatal outcome is extremely rare. VIT only becomes cost effective if one is stung frequently (eg, beekeepers) or if quality of life improvement is considered. Thus, for most people with insect sting allergy, anxiety and quality of life impairment should be the overriding consideration when making treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of a patient-centered approach. Areas which need to be explored in future research include efforts to improve the safety and convenience of VIT such as the use of sublingual immunotherapy; quality of life effects of venom allergy in children and adolescents as well as their parents; and the optimal duration of treatment. Dove Medical Press 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4517515/ /pubmed/26229493 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S62288 Text en © 2015 Ludman and Boyle. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Ludman, Sian W
Boyle, Robert J
Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy
title Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy
title_full Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy
title_fullStr Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy
title_short Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy
title_sort stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229493
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S62288
work_keys_str_mv AT ludmansianw stinginginsectallergycurrentperspectivesonvenomimmunotherapy
AT boylerobertj stinginginsectallergycurrentperspectivesonvenomimmunotherapy