Cargando…
Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy
Systemic allergic reactions to insect stings affect up to 5% of the population during their lifetime, and up to 32% of beekeepers. Such reactions can be fatal, albeit very rarely, and fear of a further systemic reaction (SR) can lead to significant anxiety and quality of life impairment. A recent Co...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229493 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S62288 |
_version_ | 1782383200497041408 |
---|---|
author | Ludman, Sian W Boyle, Robert J |
author_facet | Ludman, Sian W Boyle, Robert J |
author_sort | Ludman, Sian W |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systemic allergic reactions to insect stings affect up to 5% of the population during their lifetime, and up to 32% of beekeepers. Such reactions can be fatal, albeit very rarely, and fear of a further systemic reaction (SR) can lead to significant anxiety and quality of life impairment. A recent Cochrane systematic review confirmed that venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an effective treatment for people who have had a systemic allergic reaction to an insect sting. VIT reduces risk of a further SR (relative risk 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.28), but VIT also reduces risk of a future large local reaction, and significantly improves disease-specific quality of life. However, health economic analysis showed that VIT is generally not cost effective for preventing future SRs; most people are stung infrequently, most SRs resolve without long-term consequences, and a fatal outcome is extremely rare. VIT only becomes cost effective if one is stung frequently (eg, beekeepers) or if quality of life improvement is considered. Thus, for most people with insect sting allergy, anxiety and quality of life impairment should be the overriding consideration when making treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of a patient-centered approach. Areas which need to be explored in future research include efforts to improve the safety and convenience of VIT such as the use of sublingual immunotherapy; quality of life effects of venom allergy in children and adolescents as well as their parents; and the optimal duration of treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4517515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45175152015-07-30 Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy Ludman, Sian W Boyle, Robert J J Asthma Allergy Review Systemic allergic reactions to insect stings affect up to 5% of the population during their lifetime, and up to 32% of beekeepers. Such reactions can be fatal, albeit very rarely, and fear of a further systemic reaction (SR) can lead to significant anxiety and quality of life impairment. A recent Cochrane systematic review confirmed that venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an effective treatment for people who have had a systemic allergic reaction to an insect sting. VIT reduces risk of a further SR (relative risk 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.28), but VIT also reduces risk of a future large local reaction, and significantly improves disease-specific quality of life. However, health economic analysis showed that VIT is generally not cost effective for preventing future SRs; most people are stung infrequently, most SRs resolve without long-term consequences, and a fatal outcome is extremely rare. VIT only becomes cost effective if one is stung frequently (eg, beekeepers) or if quality of life improvement is considered. Thus, for most people with insect sting allergy, anxiety and quality of life impairment should be the overriding consideration when making treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of a patient-centered approach. Areas which need to be explored in future research include efforts to improve the safety and convenience of VIT such as the use of sublingual immunotherapy; quality of life effects of venom allergy in children and adolescents as well as their parents; and the optimal duration of treatment. Dove Medical Press 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4517515/ /pubmed/26229493 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S62288 Text en © 2015 Ludman and Boyle. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Ludman, Sian W Boyle, Robert J Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy |
title | Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy |
title_full | Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy |
title_fullStr | Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy |
title_short | Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy |
title_sort | stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229493 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S62288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ludmansianw stinginginsectallergycurrentperspectivesonvenomimmunotherapy AT boylerobertj stinginginsectallergycurrentperspectivesonvenomimmunotherapy |