Cargando…

Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores

BACKGROUND: Propensity score methods have become a popular tool for reducing selection bias in making causal inference from observational studies in medical research. Propensity score matching, a key component of propensity score methods, normally matches units based on the distance between point es...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Wei, Bai, Haiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26215035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0049-3
_version_ 1782383204375724032
author Pan, Wei
Bai, Haiyan
author_facet Pan, Wei
Bai, Haiyan
author_sort Pan, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Propensity score methods have become a popular tool for reducing selection bias in making causal inference from observational studies in medical research. Propensity score matching, a key component of propensity score methods, normally matches units based on the distance between point estimates of the propensity scores. The problem with this technique is that it is difficult to establish a sensible criterion to evaluate the closeness of matched units without knowing estimation errors of the propensity scores. METHODS: The present study introduces interval matching using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores. In interval matching, if the confidence interval of a unit in the treatment group overlaps with that of one or more units in the comparison group, they are considered as matched units. RESULTS: The procedure of interval matching is illustrated in an empirical example using a real-life dataset from the Nursing Home Compare, a national survey conducted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The empirical example provided promising evidence that interval matching reduced more selection bias than did commonly used matching methods including the rival method, caliper matching. Interval matching’s approach methodologically sounds more meaningful than its competing matching methods because interval matching develop a more “scientific” criterion for matching units using confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Interval matching is a promisingly better alternative tool for reducing selection bias in making causal inference from observational studies, especially useful in secondary data analysis on national databases such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0049-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4517543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45175432015-07-29 Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores Pan, Wei Bai, Haiyan BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Propensity score methods have become a popular tool for reducing selection bias in making causal inference from observational studies in medical research. Propensity score matching, a key component of propensity score methods, normally matches units based on the distance between point estimates of the propensity scores. The problem with this technique is that it is difficult to establish a sensible criterion to evaluate the closeness of matched units without knowing estimation errors of the propensity scores. METHODS: The present study introduces interval matching using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores. In interval matching, if the confidence interval of a unit in the treatment group overlaps with that of one or more units in the comparison group, they are considered as matched units. RESULTS: The procedure of interval matching is illustrated in an empirical example using a real-life dataset from the Nursing Home Compare, a national survey conducted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The empirical example provided promising evidence that interval matching reduced more selection bias than did commonly used matching methods including the rival method, caliper matching. Interval matching’s approach methodologically sounds more meaningful than its competing matching methods because interval matching develop a more “scientific” criterion for matching units using confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Interval matching is a promisingly better alternative tool for reducing selection bias in making causal inference from observational studies, especially useful in secondary data analysis on national databases such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0049-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4517543/ /pubmed/26215035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0049-3 Text en © Pan and Bai. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pan, Wei
Bai, Haiyan
Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores
title Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores
title_full Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores
title_fullStr Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores
title_full_unstemmed Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores
title_short Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores
title_sort propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26215035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0049-3
work_keys_str_mv AT panwei propensityscoreintervalmatchingusingbootstrapconfidenceintervalsforaccommodatingestimationerrorsofpropensityscores
AT baihaiyan propensityscoreintervalmatchingusingbootstrapconfidenceintervalsforaccommodatingestimationerrorsofpropensityscores