Cargando…

Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review

This article provides an overview of the recent literature on the use of internet-based testing to address important questions in perception research. Our goal is to provide a starting point for the perception researcher who is keen on assessing this tool for their own research goals. Internet-based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Andy T., Velasco, Carlos, Levitan, Carmel A., Wan, Xiaoang, Spence, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244107
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1058
_version_ 1782383271052574720
author Woods, Andy T.
Velasco, Carlos
Levitan, Carmel A.
Wan, Xiaoang
Spence, Charles
author_facet Woods, Andy T.
Velasco, Carlos
Levitan, Carmel A.
Wan, Xiaoang
Spence, Charles
author_sort Woods, Andy T.
collection PubMed
description This article provides an overview of the recent literature on the use of internet-based testing to address important questions in perception research. Our goal is to provide a starting point for the perception researcher who is keen on assessing this tool for their own research goals. Internet-based testing has several advantages over in-lab research, including the ability to reach a relatively broad set of participants and to quickly and inexpensively collect large amounts of empirical data, via services such as Amazon’s Mechanical Turk or Prolific Academic. In many cases, the quality of online data appears to match that collected in lab research. Generally-speaking, online participants tend to be more representative of the population at large than those recruited for lab based research. There are, though, some important caveats, when it comes to collecting data online. It is obviously much more difficult to control the exact parameters of stimulus presentation (such as display characteristics) with online research. There are also some thorny ethical elements that need to be considered by experimenters. Strengths and weaknesses of the online approach, relative to others, are highlighted, and recommendations made for those researchers who might be thinking about conducting their own studies using this increasingly-popular approach to research in the psychological sciences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4517966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45179662015-08-04 Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review Woods, Andy T. Velasco, Carlos Levitan, Carmel A. Wan, Xiaoang Spence, Charles PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology This article provides an overview of the recent literature on the use of internet-based testing to address important questions in perception research. Our goal is to provide a starting point for the perception researcher who is keen on assessing this tool for their own research goals. Internet-based testing has several advantages over in-lab research, including the ability to reach a relatively broad set of participants and to quickly and inexpensively collect large amounts of empirical data, via services such as Amazon’s Mechanical Turk or Prolific Academic. In many cases, the quality of online data appears to match that collected in lab research. Generally-speaking, online participants tend to be more representative of the population at large than those recruited for lab based research. There are, though, some important caveats, when it comes to collecting data online. It is obviously much more difficult to control the exact parameters of stimulus presentation (such as display characteristics) with online research. There are also some thorny ethical elements that need to be considered by experimenters. Strengths and weaknesses of the online approach, relative to others, are highlighted, and recommendations made for those researchers who might be thinking about conducting their own studies using this increasingly-popular approach to research in the psychological sciences. PeerJ Inc. 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4517966/ /pubmed/26244107 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1058 Text en © 2015 Woods et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Psychiatry and Psychology
Woods, Andy T.
Velasco, Carlos
Levitan, Carmel A.
Wan, Xiaoang
Spence, Charles
Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review
title Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review
title_full Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review
title_fullStr Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review
title_full_unstemmed Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review
title_short Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review
title_sort conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review
topic Psychiatry and Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244107
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1058
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsandyt conductingperceptionresearchovertheinternetatutorialreview
AT velascocarlos conductingperceptionresearchovertheinternetatutorialreview
AT levitancarmela conductingperceptionresearchovertheinternetatutorialreview
AT wanxiaoang conductingperceptionresearchovertheinternetatutorialreview
AT spencecharles conductingperceptionresearchovertheinternetatutorialreview