Cargando…
The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent rad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0021-5 |
_version_ | 1782383289045090304 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ho-Jin Kim, Jin-Wook Choi, So-Young Kim, Chin-Soo Kwon, Tae-Geon Paeng, Jun-Youg |
author_facet | Lee, Ho-Jin Kim, Jin-Wook Choi, So-Young Kim, Chin-Soo Kwon, Tae-Geon Paeng, Jun-Youg |
author_sort | Lee, Ho-Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent radical resection with or without neck dissection and free flap reconstruction due to oral cancer. The patients were classified into three groups according to the timing of the extubation; extubated groups (n = 51), overnight intubation group (n = 45), and tracheostomy group (n = 8). Cameron’s score was used to evaluate the relation between the state of the patient’s airway and the type of the operation. RESULTS: Tracheostomy was performed in eight patients (8/104, 7.7 %). A total of 22 patients (21.2 %) had more than 5 points of which 17 patients (77.3 %) did not have a tracheostomy and any postoperative emergency airway problems. The tracheostomy scores were significantly different among the three groups. Hospital stay showed a significant correlation with the tracheostomy score. CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system did not quite agree with the airway management of the authors’ clinic; however, it can be one of the clinical factors predicting the degree of the postoperative airway obstruction and surgical aggressiveness for recovery. The further studies are needed for clinically more reliable scoring systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4518133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45181332015-08-03 The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery Lee, Ho-Jin Kim, Jin-Wook Choi, So-Young Kim, Chin-Soo Kwon, Tae-Geon Paeng, Jun-Youg Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent radical resection with or without neck dissection and free flap reconstruction due to oral cancer. The patients were classified into three groups according to the timing of the extubation; extubated groups (n = 51), overnight intubation group (n = 45), and tracheostomy group (n = 8). Cameron’s score was used to evaluate the relation between the state of the patient’s airway and the type of the operation. RESULTS: Tracheostomy was performed in eight patients (8/104, 7.7 %). A total of 22 patients (21.2 %) had more than 5 points of which 17 patients (77.3 %) did not have a tracheostomy and any postoperative emergency airway problems. The tracheostomy scores were significantly different among the three groups. Hospital stay showed a significant correlation with the tracheostomy score. CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system did not quite agree with the airway management of the authors’ clinic; however, it can be one of the clinical factors predicting the degree of the postoperative airway obstruction and surgical aggressiveness for recovery. The further studies are needed for clinically more reliable scoring systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518133/ /pubmed/26247006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0021-5 Text en © Lee et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Lee, Ho-Jin Kim, Jin-Wook Choi, So-Young Kim, Chin-Soo Kwon, Tae-Geon Paeng, Jun-Youg The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery |
title | The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery |
title_full | The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery |
title_short | The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery |
title_sort | evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0021-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leehojin theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT kimjinwook theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT choisoyoung theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT kimchinsoo theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT kwontaegeon theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT paengjunyoug theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT leehojin evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT kimjinwook evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT choisoyoung evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT kimchinsoo evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT kwontaegeon evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery AT paengjunyoug evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery |