Cargando…

The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ho-Jin, Kim, Jin-Wook, Choi, So-Young, Kim, Chin-Soo, Kwon, Tae-Geon, Paeng, Jun-Youg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0021-5
_version_ 1782383289045090304
author Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Jin-Wook
Choi, So-Young
Kim, Chin-Soo
Kwon, Tae-Geon
Paeng, Jun-Youg
author_facet Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Jin-Wook
Choi, So-Young
Kim, Chin-Soo
Kwon, Tae-Geon
Paeng, Jun-Youg
author_sort Lee, Ho-Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent radical resection with or without neck dissection and free flap reconstruction due to oral cancer. The patients were classified into three groups according to the timing of the extubation; extubated groups (n = 51), overnight intubation group (n = 45), and tracheostomy group (n = 8). Cameron’s score was used to evaluate the relation between the state of the patient’s airway and the type of the operation. RESULTS: Tracheostomy was performed in eight patients (8/104, 7.7 %). A total of 22 patients (21.2 %) had more than 5 points of which 17 patients (77.3 %) did not have a tracheostomy and any postoperative emergency airway problems. The tracheostomy scores were significantly different among the three groups. Hospital stay showed a significant correlation with the tracheostomy score. CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system did not quite agree with the airway management of the authors’ clinic; however, it can be one of the clinical factors predicting the degree of the postoperative airway obstruction and surgical aggressiveness for recovery. The further studies are needed for clinically more reliable scoring systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4518133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45181332015-08-03 The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery Lee, Ho-Jin Kim, Jin-Wook Choi, So-Young Kim, Chin-Soo Kwon, Tae-Geon Paeng, Jun-Youg Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent radical resection with or without neck dissection and free flap reconstruction due to oral cancer. The patients were classified into three groups according to the timing of the extubation; extubated groups (n = 51), overnight intubation group (n = 45), and tracheostomy group (n = 8). Cameron’s score was used to evaluate the relation between the state of the patient’s airway and the type of the operation. RESULTS: Tracheostomy was performed in eight patients (8/104, 7.7 %). A total of 22 patients (21.2 %) had more than 5 points of which 17 patients (77.3 %) did not have a tracheostomy and any postoperative emergency airway problems. The tracheostomy scores were significantly different among the three groups. Hospital stay showed a significant correlation with the tracheostomy score. CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system did not quite agree with the airway management of the authors’ clinic; however, it can be one of the clinical factors predicting the degree of the postoperative airway obstruction and surgical aggressiveness for recovery. The further studies are needed for clinically more reliable scoring systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518133/ /pubmed/26247006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0021-5 Text en © Lee et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Jin-Wook
Choi, So-Young
Kim, Chin-Soo
Kwon, Tae-Geon
Paeng, Jun-Youg
The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery
title The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery
title_full The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery
title_fullStr The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery
title_short The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery
title_sort evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0021-5
work_keys_str_mv AT leehojin theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT kimjinwook theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT choisoyoung theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT kimchinsoo theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT kwontaegeon theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT paengjunyoug theevaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT leehojin evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT kimjinwook evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT choisoyoung evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT kimchinsoo evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT kwontaegeon evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery
AT paengjunyoug evaluationofascoringsysteminairwaymanagementafteroralcancersurgery