Cargando…

Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion?

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that specific psychotic symptom clusters may be explained by patterns of biological abnormalities. The presence of first rank symptoms (FRS) has been associated with cognitive abnormalities, e.g., deficits in self-monitoring or in the experience of agency, suggesting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heering, Henriette D., Koevoets, Godefridus J. C., Koenders, Laura, Machielsen, Marise W. J., Meijer, Carin J., Kubota, Manabu, de Nijs, Jessica, Cahn, Wiepke, Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E., de Haan, Lieuwe, Kahn, Rene S., van Haren, Neeltje E. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00107
_version_ 1782383289962594304
author Heering, Henriette D.
Koevoets, Godefridus J. C.
Koenders, Laura
Machielsen, Marise W. J.
Meijer, Carin J.
Kubota, Manabu
de Nijs, Jessica
Cahn, Wiepke
Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E.
de Haan, Lieuwe
Kahn, Rene S.
van Haren, Neeltje E. M.
author_facet Heering, Henriette D.
Koevoets, Godefridus J. C.
Koenders, Laura
Machielsen, Marise W. J.
Meijer, Carin J.
Kubota, Manabu
de Nijs, Jessica
Cahn, Wiepke
Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E.
de Haan, Lieuwe
Kahn, Rene S.
van Haren, Neeltje E. M.
author_sort Heering, Henriette D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that specific psychotic symptom clusters may be explained by patterns of biological abnormalities. The presence of first rank symptoms (FRS) has been associated with cognitive abnormalities, e.g., deficits in self-monitoring or in the experience of agency, suggesting that a specific network of neural abnormalities might underlie FRS. Here, we investigate differences in cortical and subcortical brain volume between patients with and without FRS. METHODS: Three independent patient samples (referred to as A, B, and C) with different mean ages and in different illness stages were included, leading to a total of 348 patients within the schizophrenia-spectrum. All underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. In addition, the presence of FRS was established using a diagnostic interview. Patients with (FRS+, A: n = 63, B: n = 129, and C: n = 96) and without FRS (FRS−, A: n = 35, B: n = 17, and C: n = 8) were compared on global and local cortical volumes as well as subcortical volumes, using a whole brain (cerebrum) approach. RESULTS: Nucleus accumbens volume was significantly smaller in FRS+ as compared with FRS− in sample A (p < 0.005). Furthermore, FRS+ showed a smaller volume of the pars-opercularis relative to FRS− in sample B (p < 0.001). No further significant differences were found in cortical and subcortical volumes between FRS+ and FRS− in either one of the three samples after correction for multiple comparison. CONCLUSION: Brain volume differences between patients with and without FRS are, when present, subtle, and not consistent between three independent samples. Brain abnormalities related to FRS may be too subtle to become visible through structural brain imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4518139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45181392015-08-17 Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion? Heering, Henriette D. Koevoets, Godefridus J. C. Koenders, Laura Machielsen, Marise W. J. Meijer, Carin J. Kubota, Manabu de Nijs, Jessica Cahn, Wiepke Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E. de Haan, Lieuwe Kahn, Rene S. van Haren, Neeltje E. M. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that specific psychotic symptom clusters may be explained by patterns of biological abnormalities. The presence of first rank symptoms (FRS) has been associated with cognitive abnormalities, e.g., deficits in self-monitoring or in the experience of agency, suggesting that a specific network of neural abnormalities might underlie FRS. Here, we investigate differences in cortical and subcortical brain volume between patients with and without FRS. METHODS: Three independent patient samples (referred to as A, B, and C) with different mean ages and in different illness stages were included, leading to a total of 348 patients within the schizophrenia-spectrum. All underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. In addition, the presence of FRS was established using a diagnostic interview. Patients with (FRS+, A: n = 63, B: n = 129, and C: n = 96) and without FRS (FRS−, A: n = 35, B: n = 17, and C: n = 8) were compared on global and local cortical volumes as well as subcortical volumes, using a whole brain (cerebrum) approach. RESULTS: Nucleus accumbens volume was significantly smaller in FRS+ as compared with FRS− in sample A (p < 0.005). Furthermore, FRS+ showed a smaller volume of the pars-opercularis relative to FRS− in sample B (p < 0.001). No further significant differences were found in cortical and subcortical volumes between FRS+ and FRS− in either one of the three samples after correction for multiple comparison. CONCLUSION: Brain volume differences between patients with and without FRS are, when present, subtle, and not consistent between three independent samples. Brain abnormalities related to FRS may be too subtle to become visible through structural brain imaging. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518139/ /pubmed/26283974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00107 Text en Copyright © 2015 Heering, Koevoets, Koenders, Machielsen, Meijer, Kubota, de Nijs, Cahn, Hulshoff Pol, de Haan, Kahn and van Haren. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Heering, Henriette D.
Koevoets, Godefridus J. C.
Koenders, Laura
Machielsen, Marise W. J.
Meijer, Carin J.
Kubota, Manabu
de Nijs, Jessica
Cahn, Wiepke
Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E.
de Haan, Lieuwe
Kahn, Rene S.
van Haren, Neeltje E. M.
Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion?
title Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion?
title_full Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion?
title_fullStr Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion?
title_full_unstemmed Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion?
title_short Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion?
title_sort structural mri differences between patients with and without first rank symptoms: a delusion?
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00107
work_keys_str_mv AT heeringhenrietted structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT koevoetsgodefridusjc structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT koenderslaura structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT machielsenmarisewj structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT meijercarinj structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT kubotamanabu structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT denijsjessica structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT cahnwiepke structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT hulshoffpolhillekee structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT dehaanlieuwe structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT kahnrenes structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion
AT vanharenneeltjeem structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion