Cargando…
Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion?
OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that specific psychotic symptom clusters may be explained by patterns of biological abnormalities. The presence of first rank symptoms (FRS) has been associated with cognitive abnormalities, e.g., deficits in self-monitoring or in the experience of agency, suggesting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00107 |
_version_ | 1782383289962594304 |
---|---|
author | Heering, Henriette D. Koevoets, Godefridus J. C. Koenders, Laura Machielsen, Marise W. J. Meijer, Carin J. Kubota, Manabu de Nijs, Jessica Cahn, Wiepke Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E. de Haan, Lieuwe Kahn, Rene S. van Haren, Neeltje E. M. |
author_facet | Heering, Henriette D. Koevoets, Godefridus J. C. Koenders, Laura Machielsen, Marise W. J. Meijer, Carin J. Kubota, Manabu de Nijs, Jessica Cahn, Wiepke Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E. de Haan, Lieuwe Kahn, Rene S. van Haren, Neeltje E. M. |
author_sort | Heering, Henriette D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that specific psychotic symptom clusters may be explained by patterns of biological abnormalities. The presence of first rank symptoms (FRS) has been associated with cognitive abnormalities, e.g., deficits in self-monitoring or in the experience of agency, suggesting that a specific network of neural abnormalities might underlie FRS. Here, we investigate differences in cortical and subcortical brain volume between patients with and without FRS. METHODS: Three independent patient samples (referred to as A, B, and C) with different mean ages and in different illness stages were included, leading to a total of 348 patients within the schizophrenia-spectrum. All underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. In addition, the presence of FRS was established using a diagnostic interview. Patients with (FRS+, A: n = 63, B: n = 129, and C: n = 96) and without FRS (FRS−, A: n = 35, B: n = 17, and C: n = 8) were compared on global and local cortical volumes as well as subcortical volumes, using a whole brain (cerebrum) approach. RESULTS: Nucleus accumbens volume was significantly smaller in FRS+ as compared with FRS− in sample A (p < 0.005). Furthermore, FRS+ showed a smaller volume of the pars-opercularis relative to FRS− in sample B (p < 0.001). No further significant differences were found in cortical and subcortical volumes between FRS+ and FRS− in either one of the three samples after correction for multiple comparison. CONCLUSION: Brain volume differences between patients with and without FRS are, when present, subtle, and not consistent between three independent samples. Brain abnormalities related to FRS may be too subtle to become visible through structural brain imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4518139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45181392015-08-17 Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion? Heering, Henriette D. Koevoets, Godefridus J. C. Koenders, Laura Machielsen, Marise W. J. Meijer, Carin J. Kubota, Manabu de Nijs, Jessica Cahn, Wiepke Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E. de Haan, Lieuwe Kahn, Rene S. van Haren, Neeltje E. M. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that specific psychotic symptom clusters may be explained by patterns of biological abnormalities. The presence of first rank symptoms (FRS) has been associated with cognitive abnormalities, e.g., deficits in self-monitoring or in the experience of agency, suggesting that a specific network of neural abnormalities might underlie FRS. Here, we investigate differences in cortical and subcortical brain volume between patients with and without FRS. METHODS: Three independent patient samples (referred to as A, B, and C) with different mean ages and in different illness stages were included, leading to a total of 348 patients within the schizophrenia-spectrum. All underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. In addition, the presence of FRS was established using a diagnostic interview. Patients with (FRS+, A: n = 63, B: n = 129, and C: n = 96) and without FRS (FRS−, A: n = 35, B: n = 17, and C: n = 8) were compared on global and local cortical volumes as well as subcortical volumes, using a whole brain (cerebrum) approach. RESULTS: Nucleus accumbens volume was significantly smaller in FRS+ as compared with FRS− in sample A (p < 0.005). Furthermore, FRS+ showed a smaller volume of the pars-opercularis relative to FRS− in sample B (p < 0.001). No further significant differences were found in cortical and subcortical volumes between FRS+ and FRS− in either one of the three samples after correction for multiple comparison. CONCLUSION: Brain volume differences between patients with and without FRS are, when present, subtle, and not consistent between three independent samples. Brain abnormalities related to FRS may be too subtle to become visible through structural brain imaging. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518139/ /pubmed/26283974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00107 Text en Copyright © 2015 Heering, Koevoets, Koenders, Machielsen, Meijer, Kubota, de Nijs, Cahn, Hulshoff Pol, de Haan, Kahn and van Haren. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Heering, Henriette D. Koevoets, Godefridus J. C. Koenders, Laura Machielsen, Marise W. J. Meijer, Carin J. Kubota, Manabu de Nijs, Jessica Cahn, Wiepke Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E. de Haan, Lieuwe Kahn, Rene S. van Haren, Neeltje E. M. Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion? |
title | Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion? |
title_full | Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion? |
title_fullStr | Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion? |
title_full_unstemmed | Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion? |
title_short | Structural MRI Differences between Patients with and without First Rank Symptoms: A Delusion? |
title_sort | structural mri differences between patients with and without first rank symptoms: a delusion? |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heeringhenrietted structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT koevoetsgodefridusjc structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT koenderslaura structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT machielsenmarisewj structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT meijercarinj structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT kubotamanabu structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT denijsjessica structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT cahnwiepke structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT hulshoffpolhillekee structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT dehaanlieuwe structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT kahnrenes structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion AT vanharenneeltjeem structuralmridifferencesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutfirstranksymptomsadelusion |