Cargando…

Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration

Humans continuously receive and integrate information from several sensory modalities. However, attentional resources limit the amount of information that can be processed. It is not yet clear how attentional resources and multisensory processing are interrelated. Specifically, the following questio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wahn, Basil, König, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26284008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01084
_version_ 1782383290402996224
author Wahn, Basil
König, Peter
author_facet Wahn, Basil
König, Peter
author_sort Wahn, Basil
collection PubMed
description Humans continuously receive and integrate information from several sensory modalities. However, attentional resources limit the amount of information that can be processed. It is not yet clear how attentional resources and multisensory processing are interrelated. Specifically, the following questions arise: (1) Are there distinct spatial attentional resources for each sensory modality? and (2) Does attentional load affect multisensory integration? We investigated these questions using a dual task paradigm: participants performed two spatial tasks (a multiple object tracking task and a localization task), either separately (single task condition) or simultaneously (dual task condition). In the multiple object tracking task, participants visually tracked a small subset of several randomly moving objects. In the localization task, participants received either visual, auditory, or redundant visual and auditory location cues. In the dual task condition, we found a substantial decrease in participants' performance relative to the results of the single task condition. Importantly, participants performed equally well in the dual task condition regardless of the location cues' modality. This result suggests that having spatial information coming from different modalities does not facilitate performance, thereby indicating shared spatial attentional resources for the auditory and visual modality. Furthermore, we found that participants integrated redundant multisensory information similarly even when they experienced additional attentional load in the dual task condition. Overall, findings suggest that (1) visual and auditory spatial attentional resources are shared and that (2) audiovisual integration of spatial information occurs in an pre-attentive processing stage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4518141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45181412015-08-17 Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration Wahn, Basil König, Peter Front Psychol Psychology Humans continuously receive and integrate information from several sensory modalities. However, attentional resources limit the amount of information that can be processed. It is not yet clear how attentional resources and multisensory processing are interrelated. Specifically, the following questions arise: (1) Are there distinct spatial attentional resources for each sensory modality? and (2) Does attentional load affect multisensory integration? We investigated these questions using a dual task paradigm: participants performed two spatial tasks (a multiple object tracking task and a localization task), either separately (single task condition) or simultaneously (dual task condition). In the multiple object tracking task, participants visually tracked a small subset of several randomly moving objects. In the localization task, participants received either visual, auditory, or redundant visual and auditory location cues. In the dual task condition, we found a substantial decrease in participants' performance relative to the results of the single task condition. Importantly, participants performed equally well in the dual task condition regardless of the location cues' modality. This result suggests that having spatial information coming from different modalities does not facilitate performance, thereby indicating shared spatial attentional resources for the auditory and visual modality. Furthermore, we found that participants integrated redundant multisensory information similarly even when they experienced additional attentional load in the dual task condition. Overall, findings suggest that (1) visual and auditory spatial attentional resources are shared and that (2) audiovisual integration of spatial information occurs in an pre-attentive processing stage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518141/ /pubmed/26284008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01084 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wahn and König. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wahn, Basil
König, Peter
Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_full Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_fullStr Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_full_unstemmed Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_short Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_sort audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26284008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01084
work_keys_str_mv AT wahnbasil auditionandvisionsharespatialattentionalresourcesyetattentionalloaddoesnotdisruptaudiovisualintegration
AT konigpeter auditionandvisionsharespatialattentionalresourcesyetattentionalloaddoesnotdisruptaudiovisualintegration