Cargando…

Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?

When exposed to the odor of a sympatric predator, prey animals typically display escape or defensive responses. These phenomena have been well-documented, especially in rodents, when exposed to the odor of a cat, ferret, or fox. As a result of these experiments new discussions center on the followin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Apfelbach, Raimund, Parsons, Michael H., Soini, Helena A., Novotny, Milos V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00263
_version_ 1782383294079303680
author Apfelbach, Raimund
Parsons, Michael H.
Soini, Helena A.
Novotny, Milos V.
author_facet Apfelbach, Raimund
Parsons, Michael H.
Soini, Helena A.
Novotny, Milos V.
author_sort Apfelbach, Raimund
collection PubMed
description When exposed to the odor of a sympatric predator, prey animals typically display escape or defensive responses. These phenomena have been well-documented, especially in rodents, when exposed to the odor of a cat, ferret, or fox. As a result of these experiments new discussions center on the following questions: (1) is a single volatile compound such as a major or a minor mixture constituent in urine or feces, emitted by the predator sufficient to cause defensive reactions in a potential prey species or (2) is a whole array of odors required to elicit a response and (3) will the relative size or escapability of the prey as compared to the predator influence responsiveness. Most predator-prey studies on this topic have been performed in the laboratory or under semi-natural conditions. Field studies could help to find answers to these questions. Australian mammals are completely naïve toward the introduced placental carnivores. That offers ideal opportunities to analyze in the field the responses of potential prey species to unknown predator odors. During the last decades researchers have accumulated an enormous amount of data exploring the effects of eutherian predator odors on native marsupial mammals. In this review, we will give a survey about the development of olfactory research, chemical signals and their influence on the behavior and—in some cases—physiology of prey species. In addition, we report on the effects of predator odor experiments performed under natural conditions in Australia. When studying all these literature we learned that data gained under controlled laboratory conditions elucidate the role of individual odors on brain structures and ultimately on a comparatively narrow range behaviors. In contrast to single odors odor arrays mimic much more the situation prey animals are confronted to in nature. Therefore, a broad range of methodology—from chemistry to ecology including anatomy, physiology, and behavior—is needed to understand all the different (relevant) stimuli that govern and guide the interactions between a predator and its potential prey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4518157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45181572015-08-17 Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species? Apfelbach, Raimund Parsons, Michael H. Soini, Helena A. Novotny, Milos V. Front Neurosci Physiology When exposed to the odor of a sympatric predator, prey animals typically display escape or defensive responses. These phenomena have been well-documented, especially in rodents, when exposed to the odor of a cat, ferret, or fox. As a result of these experiments new discussions center on the following questions: (1) is a single volatile compound such as a major or a minor mixture constituent in urine or feces, emitted by the predator sufficient to cause defensive reactions in a potential prey species or (2) is a whole array of odors required to elicit a response and (3) will the relative size or escapability of the prey as compared to the predator influence responsiveness. Most predator-prey studies on this topic have been performed in the laboratory or under semi-natural conditions. Field studies could help to find answers to these questions. Australian mammals are completely naïve toward the introduced placental carnivores. That offers ideal opportunities to analyze in the field the responses of potential prey species to unknown predator odors. During the last decades researchers have accumulated an enormous amount of data exploring the effects of eutherian predator odors on native marsupial mammals. In this review, we will give a survey about the development of olfactory research, chemical signals and their influence on the behavior and—in some cases—physiology of prey species. In addition, we report on the effects of predator odor experiments performed under natural conditions in Australia. When studying all these literature we learned that data gained under controlled laboratory conditions elucidate the role of individual odors on brain structures and ultimately on a comparatively narrow range behaviors. In contrast to single odors odor arrays mimic much more the situation prey animals are confronted to in nature. Therefore, a broad range of methodology—from chemistry to ecology including anatomy, physiology, and behavior—is needed to understand all the different (relevant) stimuli that govern and guide the interactions between a predator and its potential prey. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518157/ /pubmed/26283903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00263 Text en Copyright © 2015 Apfelbach, Parsons, Soini and Novotny. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Apfelbach, Raimund
Parsons, Michael H.
Soini, Helena A.
Novotny, Milos V.
Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?
title Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?
title_full Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?
title_fullStr Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?
title_full_unstemmed Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?
title_short Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?
title_sort are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00263
work_keys_str_mv AT apfelbachraimund aresingleodorouscomponentsofapredatorsufficienttoelicitdefensivebehaviorsinpreyspecies
AT parsonsmichaelh aresingleodorouscomponentsofapredatorsufficienttoelicitdefensivebehaviorsinpreyspecies
AT soinihelenaa aresingleodorouscomponentsofapredatorsufficienttoelicitdefensivebehaviorsinpreyspecies
AT novotnymilosv aresingleodorouscomponentsofapredatorsufficienttoelicitdefensivebehaviorsinpreyspecies