Cargando…
Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation
Multi-subject or group-level component analysis provides a data-driven approach to study properties of brain networks. Algorithms for group-level data decomposition of functional magnetic resonance imaging data have been brought forward more than a decade ago and have significantly matured since. Si...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00254 |
_version_ | 1782383294777655296 |
---|---|
author | Huster, Rene J. Plis, Sergey M. Calhoun, Vince D. |
author_facet | Huster, Rene J. Plis, Sergey M. Calhoun, Vince D. |
author_sort | Huster, Rene J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multi-subject or group-level component analysis provides a data-driven approach to study properties of brain networks. Algorithms for group-level data decomposition of functional magnetic resonance imaging data have been brought forward more than a decade ago and have significantly matured since. Similar applications for electroencephalographic data are at a comparatively early stage of development though, and their sensitivity to topographic variability of the electroencephalogram or loose time-locking of neuronal responses has not yet been assessed. This study investigates the performance of independent component analysis (ICA) and second order blind source identification (SOBI) for data decomposition, and their combination with either temporal or spatial concatenation of data sets, for multi-subject analyses of electroencephalographic data. Analyses of simulated sources with different spatial, frequency, and time-locking profiles, revealed that temporal concatenation of data sets with either ICA or SOBI served well to reconstruct sources with both strict and loose time-locking, whereas performance decreased in the presence of topographical variability. The opposite pattern was found with a spatial concatenation of subject-specific data sets. This study proofs that procedures for group-level decomposition of electroencephalographic data can be considered valid and promising approaches to infer the latent structure of multi-subject data sets. Yet, specific implementations need further adaptations to optimally address sources of inter-subject and inter-trial variance commonly found in EEG recordings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4518160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45181602015-08-17 Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation Huster, Rene J. Plis, Sergey M. Calhoun, Vince D. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Multi-subject or group-level component analysis provides a data-driven approach to study properties of brain networks. Algorithms for group-level data decomposition of functional magnetic resonance imaging data have been brought forward more than a decade ago and have significantly matured since. Similar applications for electroencephalographic data are at a comparatively early stage of development though, and their sensitivity to topographic variability of the electroencephalogram or loose time-locking of neuronal responses has not yet been assessed. This study investigates the performance of independent component analysis (ICA) and second order blind source identification (SOBI) for data decomposition, and their combination with either temporal or spatial concatenation of data sets, for multi-subject analyses of electroencephalographic data. Analyses of simulated sources with different spatial, frequency, and time-locking profiles, revealed that temporal concatenation of data sets with either ICA or SOBI served well to reconstruct sources with both strict and loose time-locking, whereas performance decreased in the presence of topographical variability. The opposite pattern was found with a spatial concatenation of subject-specific data sets. This study proofs that procedures for group-level decomposition of electroencephalographic data can be considered valid and promising approaches to infer the latent structure of multi-subject data sets. Yet, specific implementations need further adaptations to optimally address sources of inter-subject and inter-trial variance commonly found in EEG recordings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518160/ /pubmed/26283897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00254 Text en Copyright © 2015 Huster, Plis and Calhoun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Huster, Rene J. Plis, Sergey M. Calhoun, Vince D. Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation |
title | Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation |
title_full | Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation |
title_fullStr | Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation |
title_short | Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation |
title_sort | group-level component analyses of eeg: validation and evaluation |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT husterrenej grouplevelcomponentanalysesofeegvalidationandevaluation AT plissergeym grouplevelcomponentanalysesofeegvalidationandevaluation AT calhounvinced grouplevelcomponentanalysesofeegvalidationandevaluation |