Cargando…

Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation

Multi-subject or group-level component analysis provides a data-driven approach to study properties of brain networks. Algorithms for group-level data decomposition of functional magnetic resonance imaging data have been brought forward more than a decade ago and have significantly matured since. Si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huster, Rene J., Plis, Sergey M., Calhoun, Vince D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00254
_version_ 1782383294777655296
author Huster, Rene J.
Plis, Sergey M.
Calhoun, Vince D.
author_facet Huster, Rene J.
Plis, Sergey M.
Calhoun, Vince D.
author_sort Huster, Rene J.
collection PubMed
description Multi-subject or group-level component analysis provides a data-driven approach to study properties of brain networks. Algorithms for group-level data decomposition of functional magnetic resonance imaging data have been brought forward more than a decade ago and have significantly matured since. Similar applications for electroencephalographic data are at a comparatively early stage of development though, and their sensitivity to topographic variability of the electroencephalogram or loose time-locking of neuronal responses has not yet been assessed. This study investigates the performance of independent component analysis (ICA) and second order blind source identification (SOBI) for data decomposition, and their combination with either temporal or spatial concatenation of data sets, for multi-subject analyses of electroencephalographic data. Analyses of simulated sources with different spatial, frequency, and time-locking profiles, revealed that temporal concatenation of data sets with either ICA or SOBI served well to reconstruct sources with both strict and loose time-locking, whereas performance decreased in the presence of topographical variability. The opposite pattern was found with a spatial concatenation of subject-specific data sets. This study proofs that procedures for group-level decomposition of electroencephalographic data can be considered valid and promising approaches to infer the latent structure of multi-subject data sets. Yet, specific implementations need further adaptations to optimally address sources of inter-subject and inter-trial variance commonly found in EEG recordings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4518160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45181602015-08-17 Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation Huster, Rene J. Plis, Sergey M. Calhoun, Vince D. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Multi-subject or group-level component analysis provides a data-driven approach to study properties of brain networks. Algorithms for group-level data decomposition of functional magnetic resonance imaging data have been brought forward more than a decade ago and have significantly matured since. Similar applications for electroencephalographic data are at a comparatively early stage of development though, and their sensitivity to topographic variability of the electroencephalogram or loose time-locking of neuronal responses has not yet been assessed. This study investigates the performance of independent component analysis (ICA) and second order blind source identification (SOBI) for data decomposition, and their combination with either temporal or spatial concatenation of data sets, for multi-subject analyses of electroencephalographic data. Analyses of simulated sources with different spatial, frequency, and time-locking profiles, revealed that temporal concatenation of data sets with either ICA or SOBI served well to reconstruct sources with both strict and loose time-locking, whereas performance decreased in the presence of topographical variability. The opposite pattern was found with a spatial concatenation of subject-specific data sets. This study proofs that procedures for group-level decomposition of electroencephalographic data can be considered valid and promising approaches to infer the latent structure of multi-subject data sets. Yet, specific implementations need further adaptations to optimally address sources of inter-subject and inter-trial variance commonly found in EEG recordings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518160/ /pubmed/26283897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00254 Text en Copyright © 2015 Huster, Plis and Calhoun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Huster, Rene J.
Plis, Sergey M.
Calhoun, Vince D.
Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation
title Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation
title_full Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation
title_fullStr Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation
title_short Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation
title_sort group-level component analyses of eeg: validation and evaluation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00254
work_keys_str_mv AT husterrenej grouplevelcomponentanalysesofeegvalidationandevaluation
AT plissergeym grouplevelcomponentanalysesofeegvalidationandevaluation
AT calhounvinced grouplevelcomponentanalysesofeegvalidationandevaluation