Cargando…
Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species
BACKGROUND: The Erythrinidae fish family contains three genera, Hoplias, Erythrinus and Hoplerythrinus widely distributed in Neotropical region. Remarkably, species from this family are characterized by an extensive karyotype diversity, with 2n ranging from 39 to 54 chromosomes and the occurrence of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0161-4 |
_version_ | 1782383372152078336 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Ezequiel Aguiar Bertollo, Luiz Antônio Carlos Yano, Cassia Fernanda Liehr, Thomas Cioffi, Marcelo de Bello |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Ezequiel Aguiar Bertollo, Luiz Antônio Carlos Yano, Cassia Fernanda Liehr, Thomas Cioffi, Marcelo de Bello |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Ezequiel Aguiar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Erythrinidae fish family contains three genera, Hoplias, Erythrinus and Hoplerythrinus widely distributed in Neotropical region. Remarkably, species from this family are characterized by an extensive karyotype diversity, with 2n ranging from 39 to 54 chromosomes and the occurrence of single and/or multiple sex chromosome systems in some species. However, inside the Hoplias genus, while H. malabaricus was subject of many studies, the cytogenetics of other congeneric species remains poorly explored. In this study, we have investigated chromosomal characteristics of four Hoplias species, namely H. lacerdae, H. brasiliensis, H. intermedius and H. aimara. We used conventional staining techniques (C-banding, Ag-impregnation and CMA(3) -fluorescence) as well as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with minor and major rDNA and microsatellite DNAs as probes in order to analyze the karyotype evolution within the genus. RESULTS: All species showed invariably 2n = 50 chromosomes and practically identical karyotypes dominated only by meta- and submetacentric chromosomes, the absence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes, similar pattern of C-positive heterochromatin blocks and homologous Ag-NOR-bearing pairs. The cytogenetic mapping of five repetitive DNA sequences revealed some particular interspecific differences between them. However, the examined chromosomal characteristics indicate that their speciation was not associated with major changes in their karyotypes. CONCLUSION: Such conserved karyotypes contrasts with the extensive karyotype diversity that has been observed in other Erythrinidae species, particularly in the congeneric species H. malabaricus. Nevertheless, what forces drive such particularly different modes of karyotype evolution among closely related species? Different life styles, population structure and inner chromosomal characteristics related to similar cases in other vertebrate groups can also account for the contrasting modes of karyotype evolution in Hoplias genus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4518567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45185672015-07-30 Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species de Oliveira, Ezequiel Aguiar Bertollo, Luiz Antônio Carlos Yano, Cassia Fernanda Liehr, Thomas Cioffi, Marcelo de Bello Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: The Erythrinidae fish family contains three genera, Hoplias, Erythrinus and Hoplerythrinus widely distributed in Neotropical region. Remarkably, species from this family are characterized by an extensive karyotype diversity, with 2n ranging from 39 to 54 chromosomes and the occurrence of single and/or multiple sex chromosome systems in some species. However, inside the Hoplias genus, while H. malabaricus was subject of many studies, the cytogenetics of other congeneric species remains poorly explored. In this study, we have investigated chromosomal characteristics of four Hoplias species, namely H. lacerdae, H. brasiliensis, H. intermedius and H. aimara. We used conventional staining techniques (C-banding, Ag-impregnation and CMA(3) -fluorescence) as well as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with minor and major rDNA and microsatellite DNAs as probes in order to analyze the karyotype evolution within the genus. RESULTS: All species showed invariably 2n = 50 chromosomes and practically identical karyotypes dominated only by meta- and submetacentric chromosomes, the absence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes, similar pattern of C-positive heterochromatin blocks and homologous Ag-NOR-bearing pairs. The cytogenetic mapping of five repetitive DNA sequences revealed some particular interspecific differences between them. However, the examined chromosomal characteristics indicate that their speciation was not associated with major changes in their karyotypes. CONCLUSION: Such conserved karyotypes contrasts with the extensive karyotype diversity that has been observed in other Erythrinidae species, particularly in the congeneric species H. malabaricus. Nevertheless, what forces drive such particularly different modes of karyotype evolution among closely related species? Different life styles, population structure and inner chromosomal characteristics related to similar cases in other vertebrate groups can also account for the contrasting modes of karyotype evolution in Hoplias genus. BioMed Central 2015-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4518567/ /pubmed/26225139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0161-4 Text en © de Oliveira et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research de Oliveira, Ezequiel Aguiar Bertollo, Luiz Antônio Carlos Yano, Cassia Fernanda Liehr, Thomas Cioffi, Marcelo de Bello Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species |
title | Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species |
title_full | Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species |
title_fullStr | Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species |
title_short | Comparative cytogenetics in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species |
title_sort | comparative cytogenetics in the genus hoplias (characiformes, erythrinidae) highlights contrasting karyotype evolution among congeneric species |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0161-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveiraezequielaguiar comparativecytogeneticsinthegenushopliascharaciformeserythrinidaehighlightscontrastingkaryotypeevolutionamongcongenericspecies AT bertolloluizantoniocarlos comparativecytogeneticsinthegenushopliascharaciformeserythrinidaehighlightscontrastingkaryotypeevolutionamongcongenericspecies AT yanocassiafernanda comparativecytogeneticsinthegenushopliascharaciformeserythrinidaehighlightscontrastingkaryotypeevolutionamongcongenericspecies AT liehrthomas comparativecytogeneticsinthegenushopliascharaciformeserythrinidaehighlightscontrastingkaryotypeevolutionamongcongenericspecies AT cioffimarcelodebello comparativecytogeneticsinthegenushopliascharaciformeserythrinidaehighlightscontrastingkaryotypeevolutionamongcongenericspecies |