Cargando…

Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?

BACKGROUND: An imaging tool providing reliable prostate cancer (PCa) detection and localization is necessary to improve common diagnostic pathway with ultrasound targeted biopsies. To determine the performance of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) augmented by prostate HistoScanning(TM) analysis (PHS) we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamann, Moritz Franz, Hamann, C., Trettel, A., Jünemann, K P, Naumann, C M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26223353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0072-z
_version_ 1782383380714749952
author Hamann, Moritz Franz
Hamann, C.
Trettel, A.
Jünemann, K P
Naumann, C M
author_facet Hamann, Moritz Franz
Hamann, C.
Trettel, A.
Jünemann, K P
Naumann, C M
author_sort Hamann, Moritz Franz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An imaging tool providing reliable prostate cancer (PCa) detection and localization is necessary to improve common diagnostic pathway with ultrasound targeted biopsies. To determine the performance of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) augmented by prostate HistoScanning(TM) analysis (PHS) we investigated the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) foci in repeat prostate biopsies (Bx). METHODS: 97 men with a mean age of 66.2 (44 – 82) years underwent PHS augmented TRUS analysis prior to a repeat Bx. Three PHS positive foci were defined in accordance with 6 bilateral prostatic sectors. Targeted Bx (tBx) limited to PHS positive foci and a systematic 14-core backup Bx (sBx) were taken. Results were correlated to biopsy outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. RESULTS: PCa was found in 31 of 97 (32 %) patients. Detection rate in tBx was significantly higher (p < .001). Detection rate in tBx and sBx did not differ on patient level(p ≥ 0.7). PHS sensitivity, specificity, predictive accuracy, PPV and NPV were 45 %, 83 %, 80 %, 19 % and 95 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PHS augmented TRUS identifies abnormal prostatic tissue. Although sensitivity and PPV for PCa are low, PHS information facilitates Bx targeting to vulnerable foci and results in a higher cancer detection rate. PHS targeted Bx should be considered in patients at persistent risk of PCa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4518605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45186052015-07-30 Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies? Hamann, Moritz Franz Hamann, C. Trettel, A. Jünemann, K P Naumann, C M BMC Urol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: An imaging tool providing reliable prostate cancer (PCa) detection and localization is necessary to improve common diagnostic pathway with ultrasound targeted biopsies. To determine the performance of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) augmented by prostate HistoScanning(TM) analysis (PHS) we investigated the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) foci in repeat prostate biopsies (Bx). METHODS: 97 men with a mean age of 66.2 (44 – 82) years underwent PHS augmented TRUS analysis prior to a repeat Bx. Three PHS positive foci were defined in accordance with 6 bilateral prostatic sectors. Targeted Bx (tBx) limited to PHS positive foci and a systematic 14-core backup Bx (sBx) were taken. Results were correlated to biopsy outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. RESULTS: PCa was found in 31 of 97 (32 %) patients. Detection rate in tBx was significantly higher (p < .001). Detection rate in tBx and sBx did not differ on patient level(p ≥ 0.7). PHS sensitivity, specificity, predictive accuracy, PPV and NPV were 45 %, 83 %, 80 %, 19 % and 95 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PHS augmented TRUS identifies abnormal prostatic tissue. Although sensitivity and PPV for PCa are low, PHS information facilitates Bx targeting to vulnerable foci and results in a higher cancer detection rate. PHS targeted Bx should be considered in patients at persistent risk of PCa. BioMed Central 2015-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4518605/ /pubmed/26223353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0072-z Text en © Hamann et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Hamann, Moritz Franz
Hamann, C.
Trettel, A.
Jünemann, K P
Naumann, C M
Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
title Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
title_full Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
title_fullStr Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
title_full_unstemmed Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
title_short Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
title_sort computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate histoscanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26223353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0072-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hamannmoritzfranz computeraidedtransrectalultrasounddoesprostatehistoscanningimprovedetectionperformanceofprostatecancerinrepeatbiopsies
AT hamannc computeraidedtransrectalultrasounddoesprostatehistoscanningimprovedetectionperformanceofprostatecancerinrepeatbiopsies
AT trettela computeraidedtransrectalultrasounddoesprostatehistoscanningimprovedetectionperformanceofprostatecancerinrepeatbiopsies
AT junemannkp computeraidedtransrectalultrasounddoesprostatehistoscanningimprovedetectionperformanceofprostatecancerinrepeatbiopsies
AT naumanncm computeraidedtransrectalultrasounddoesprostatehistoscanningimprovedetectionperformanceofprostatecancerinrepeatbiopsies