Cargando…

Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol

BACKGROUND: Health system integration is a key component of health system reform with the goal of improving outcomes for patients, providers, and the health system. Although health systems continue to strive for better integration, current delivery of health services continues to be fragmented. A ke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oelke, Nelly D., Suter, Esther, da Silva Lima, Maria Alice Dias, Van Vliet-Brown, Cheryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0090-7
_version_ 1782383390205411328
author Oelke, Nelly D.
Suter, Esther
da Silva Lima, Maria Alice Dias
Van Vliet-Brown, Cheryl
author_facet Oelke, Nelly D.
Suter, Esther
da Silva Lima, Maria Alice Dias
Van Vliet-Brown, Cheryl
author_sort Oelke, Nelly D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health system integration is a key component of health system reform with the goal of improving outcomes for patients, providers, and the health system. Although health systems continue to strive for better integration, current delivery of health services continues to be fragmented. A key gap in the literature is the lack of information on what successful integration looks like and how to measure achievement towards an integrated system. This multi-site study protocol builds on a prior knowledge synthesis completed by two of the primary investigators which identified 10 key principles that collectively support health system integration. The aim is to answer two research questions: What are appropriate indicators for each of the 10 key integration principles developed in our previous knowledge synthesis and what measurement tools are used to measure these indicators? To enhance generalizability of the findings, a partnership between Canada and Brazil was created as health system integration is a priority in both countries and they share similar contexts. METHODS/DESIGN: This knowledge synthesis will follow an iterative scoping review process with emerging information from knowledge-user engagement leading to the refinement of research questions and study selection. This paper describes the methods for each phase of the study. Research questions were developed with stakeholder input. Indicator identification and prioritization will utilize a modified Delphi method and patient/user focus groups. Based on priority indicators, a search of the literature will be completed and studies screened for inclusion. Quality appraisal of relevant studies will be completed prior to data extraction. Results will be used to develop recommendations and key messages to be presented through integrated and end-of-grant knowledge translation strategies with researchers and knowledge-users from the three jurisdictions. DISCUSSION: This project will directly benefit policy and decision-makers by providing an easy accessible set of indicators and tools to measure health system integration across different contexts and cultures. Being able to evaluate the success of integration strategies and initiatives will lead to better health system design and improved health outcomes for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4518647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45186472015-07-30 Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol Oelke, Nelly D. Suter, Esther da Silva Lima, Maria Alice Dias Van Vliet-Brown, Cheryl Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Health system integration is a key component of health system reform with the goal of improving outcomes for patients, providers, and the health system. Although health systems continue to strive for better integration, current delivery of health services continues to be fragmented. A key gap in the literature is the lack of information on what successful integration looks like and how to measure achievement towards an integrated system. This multi-site study protocol builds on a prior knowledge synthesis completed by two of the primary investigators which identified 10 key principles that collectively support health system integration. The aim is to answer two research questions: What are appropriate indicators for each of the 10 key integration principles developed in our previous knowledge synthesis and what measurement tools are used to measure these indicators? To enhance generalizability of the findings, a partnership between Canada and Brazil was created as health system integration is a priority in both countries and they share similar contexts. METHODS/DESIGN: This knowledge synthesis will follow an iterative scoping review process with emerging information from knowledge-user engagement leading to the refinement of research questions and study selection. This paper describes the methods for each phase of the study. Research questions were developed with stakeholder input. Indicator identification and prioritization will utilize a modified Delphi method and patient/user focus groups. Based on priority indicators, a search of the literature will be completed and studies screened for inclusion. Quality appraisal of relevant studies will be completed prior to data extraction. Results will be used to develop recommendations and key messages to be presented through integrated and end-of-grant knowledge translation strategies with researchers and knowledge-users from the three jurisdictions. DISCUSSION: This project will directly benefit policy and decision-makers by providing an easy accessible set of indicators and tools to measure health system integration across different contexts and cultures. Being able to evaluate the success of integration strategies and initiatives will lead to better health system design and improved health outcomes for patients. BioMed Central 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518647/ /pubmed/26220097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0090-7 Text en © Oelke et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Oelke, Nelly D.
Suter, Esther
da Silva Lima, Maria Alice Dias
Van Vliet-Brown, Cheryl
Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol
title Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol
title_full Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol
title_fullStr Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol
title_full_unstemmed Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol
title_short Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol
title_sort indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0090-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oelkenellyd indicatorsandmeasurementtoolsforhealthsystemintegrationaknowledgesynthesisprotocol
AT suteresther indicatorsandmeasurementtoolsforhealthsystemintegrationaknowledgesynthesisprotocol
AT dasilvalimamariaalicedias indicatorsandmeasurementtoolsforhealthsystemintegrationaknowledgesynthesisprotocol
AT vanvlietbrowncheryl indicatorsandmeasurementtoolsforhealthsystemintegrationaknowledgesynthesisprotocol