Cargando…

Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records

BACKGROUND: Patient safety research has focused largely on hospital settings despite the fact that in many countries, the majority of patient contacts are in primary care. The knowledge base about patient safety in primary care is developing but sparse and diagnostic error is a relatively understudi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh, Singh, Hardeep, Reeves, David, Stocks, Jill, Rebecca, Morris, Esmail, Aneez, Campbell, Stephen, de Wet, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0296-z
_version_ 1782383390899568640
author Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
Singh, Hardeep
Reeves, David
Stocks, Jill
Rebecca, Morris
Esmail, Aneez
Campbell, Stephen
de Wet, Carl
author_facet Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
Singh, Hardeep
Reeves, David
Stocks, Jill
Rebecca, Morris
Esmail, Aneez
Campbell, Stephen
de Wet, Carl
author_sort Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient safety research has focused largely on hospital settings despite the fact that in many countries, the majority of patient contacts are in primary care. The knowledge base about patient safety in primary care is developing but sparse and diagnostic error is a relatively understudied and an unmeasured area of patient safety. Diagnostic error rates vary according to how ‘error’ is defined but one suggested hallmark is clear evidence of ‘missed opportunity’ (MDOs) makes a correct or timely diagnosis to prevent them. While there is no agreed definition or method of measuring MDOs, retrospective manual chart or patient record reviews are a ‘gold standard’. This study protocol aims to (1) determine the incidence of MDOs in English general practice, (2) identify the confounding and contributing factors that lead to MDOs and (3) determine the (potential) impact of the detected MDOs on patients. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to conduct a two-phase retrospective review of electronic health records in the Greater Manchester (GM) area of the UK. In the first phase, clinician reviewers will calibrate their performance in identifying and assessing MDOs against a gold standard ‘primary reviewer’ through the use of ‘double’ reviews of records. The findings will enable a preliminary estimate of the incidence of MDOs in general practice, which will be used to calculate the number of records to be reviewed in the second phase in order to estimate the true incidence of MDO in general practice. A sample of 15 general practices is required for phase 1 and up to 35 practices for phase 2. In each practice, the sample will consist of 100 patients aged ≥18 years on 1 April 2013 who have attended a face-to-face ‘index consultation’ between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2015. The index consultation will be selected randomly from each unique patient record, occurring between 1 July 2013 and 30 June 2014. DISCUSSION: There are no reliable estimates of safety problems related to diagnosis in English general practice. This study will lay the foundation for safety improvements in this area by providing a more reliable estimate of MDOs, their impact and their contributory factors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0296-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4518650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45186502015-07-30 Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh Singh, Hardeep Reeves, David Stocks, Jill Rebecca, Morris Esmail, Aneez Campbell, Stephen de Wet, Carl Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patient safety research has focused largely on hospital settings despite the fact that in many countries, the majority of patient contacts are in primary care. The knowledge base about patient safety in primary care is developing but sparse and diagnostic error is a relatively understudied and an unmeasured area of patient safety. Diagnostic error rates vary according to how ‘error’ is defined but one suggested hallmark is clear evidence of ‘missed opportunity’ (MDOs) makes a correct or timely diagnosis to prevent them. While there is no agreed definition or method of measuring MDOs, retrospective manual chart or patient record reviews are a ‘gold standard’. This study protocol aims to (1) determine the incidence of MDOs in English general practice, (2) identify the confounding and contributing factors that lead to MDOs and (3) determine the (potential) impact of the detected MDOs on patients. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to conduct a two-phase retrospective review of electronic health records in the Greater Manchester (GM) area of the UK. In the first phase, clinician reviewers will calibrate their performance in identifying and assessing MDOs against a gold standard ‘primary reviewer’ through the use of ‘double’ reviews of records. The findings will enable a preliminary estimate of the incidence of MDOs in general practice, which will be used to calculate the number of records to be reviewed in the second phase in order to estimate the true incidence of MDO in general practice. A sample of 15 general practices is required for phase 1 and up to 35 practices for phase 2. In each practice, the sample will consist of 100 patients aged ≥18 years on 1 April 2013 who have attended a face-to-face ‘index consultation’ between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2015. The index consultation will be selected randomly from each unique patient record, occurring between 1 July 2013 and 30 June 2014. DISCUSSION: There are no reliable estimates of safety problems related to diagnosis in English general practice. This study will lay the foundation for safety improvements in this area by providing a more reliable estimate of MDOs, their impact and their contributory factors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0296-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4518650/ /pubmed/26220545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0296-z Text en © Cheraghi-Sohi et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
Singh, Hardeep
Reeves, David
Stocks, Jill
Rebecca, Morris
Esmail, Aneez
Campbell, Stephen
de Wet, Carl
Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records
title Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records
title_full Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records
title_fullStr Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records
title_full_unstemmed Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records
title_short Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records
title_sort missed diagnostic opportunities and english general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0296-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cheraghisohisudeh misseddiagnosticopportunitiesandenglishgeneralpracticeastudytodeterminetheirincidenceconfoundingandcontributingfactorsandpotentialimpactonpatientsthroughretrospectivereviewofelectronicmedicalrecords
AT singhhardeep misseddiagnosticopportunitiesandenglishgeneralpracticeastudytodeterminetheirincidenceconfoundingandcontributingfactorsandpotentialimpactonpatientsthroughretrospectivereviewofelectronicmedicalrecords
AT reevesdavid misseddiagnosticopportunitiesandenglishgeneralpracticeastudytodeterminetheirincidenceconfoundingandcontributingfactorsandpotentialimpactonpatientsthroughretrospectivereviewofelectronicmedicalrecords
AT stocksjill misseddiagnosticopportunitiesandenglishgeneralpracticeastudytodeterminetheirincidenceconfoundingandcontributingfactorsandpotentialimpactonpatientsthroughretrospectivereviewofelectronicmedicalrecords
AT rebeccamorris misseddiagnosticopportunitiesandenglishgeneralpracticeastudytodeterminetheirincidenceconfoundingandcontributingfactorsandpotentialimpactonpatientsthroughretrospectivereviewofelectronicmedicalrecords
AT esmailaneez misseddiagnosticopportunitiesandenglishgeneralpracticeastudytodeterminetheirincidenceconfoundingandcontributingfactorsandpotentialimpactonpatientsthroughretrospectivereviewofelectronicmedicalrecords
AT campbellstephen misseddiagnosticopportunitiesandenglishgeneralpracticeastudytodeterminetheirincidenceconfoundingandcontributingfactorsandpotentialimpactonpatientsthroughretrospectivereviewofelectronicmedicalrecords
AT dewetcarl misseddiagnosticopportunitiesandenglishgeneralpracticeastudytodeterminetheirincidenceconfoundingandcontributingfactorsandpotentialimpactonpatientsthroughretrospectivereviewofelectronicmedicalrecords