Cargando…

Potential research participants support the return of raw sequence data

Health-related results that are discovered in the process of genomic research should only be returned to research participants after being clinically validated and then delivered and followed up within a health service. Returning such results may be difficult for genomic researchers who are limited...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Middleton, Anna, Wright, Caroline F, Morley, Katherine I, Bragin, Eugene, Firth, Helen V, Hurles, Matthew E, Parker, Michael
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:	Ethics and Policy
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103119

Ejemplares similares

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research
por: Middleton, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Returning genome sequences to research participants: Policy and practice
por: Wright, Caroline F., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review
por: Kirkby, Helen Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research
por: Middleton, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

2171: Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in Clinical and Translational Studies
por: Otado, Jane A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study
por: Grant, Azure Dominique, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Returning raw genomic data: rights of research participants and obligations of health care professionals
por: Nielsen, Jane L, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
por: Dal-Ré, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Enhancing fieldworkers’ performance management support in health research: an exploratory study on the views of field managers and fieldworkers from major research centres in Africa
por: Kombe, Francis Kazungu, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers and Researchers on Research Priorities in Donation and Transplantation in Canada: A Pilot Workshop
por: Allard, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Self-directed multimedia process for delivering participant informed consent
por: Chapman, Niamh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Informal professionalization of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials in Russia
por: Zvonareva, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study
por: Parker, Melissa J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Public reporting of clinical trial findings as an ethical responsibility to participants: a qualitative study
por: Morrow, Richard L, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

DECIPHER: database for the interpretation of phenotype-linked plausibly pathogenic sequence and copy-number variation
por: Bragin, Eugene, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Healthcare access for children and families on the move and migrants
por: Murphy, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases
por: Kleiderman, Erika, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions
por: Raza, M Zulfiqar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Ethical frameworks in clinical research processes during COVID-19: a scoping review
por: Kasherman, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Insurance in clinical research
por: Ghooi, Ravindra B., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Diversity pipelines: The rationale to recruit and support minority physicians
por: Clayborne, Elizabeth P., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Developing informed consent materials for non-English-speaking participants: An analysis of four professional firm translations from English to Spanish
por: Brelsford, Kathleen Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Money-oriented risk-takers or deliberate decision-makers: a cross-sectional survey study of participants in controlled human infection trials
por: Hoogerwerf, Marie-Astrid, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement
por: Knoppers, Bartha Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
por: Shearman, Kirstie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Approaches to consent in public health research in secondary schools
por: Bonell, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Lived Experience Of Participants in an African RandomiseD trial (LEOPARD): protocol for an in-depth qualitative study within a multisite randomised controlled trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis
por: Lawrence, David S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Determining the level of data sharing, and number of publications, from research databases that have been given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Trace, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

2530: Should all clinical research subjects pay the same?
por: McKinney, Bernadette
Publicado: (2018)

Research ethics committees: Need for harmonization at the national level, the global and Indian perspective
por: Walanj, Aparna Sanjiv
Publicado: (2014)

Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
por: Monach, Paul A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evidence for stratified conflicts of interest policies in research contexts: a methodological review
por: Graham, S Scott, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
por: Leese, Jenny, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical ethics support services in paediatric practice: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review on structures, interventions and outcomes
por: Dittborn, Mariana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Values in breast cancer screening: an empirical study with Australian experts
por: Parker, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Informed consent in psychiatry clinical research: A conceptual review of issues, challenges, and recommendations
por: Gupta, Umesh Chandra, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

2084: Knowledge, attitudes, and experiences towards genetic research among persons of African descent
por: Otado, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_7du4qtt0duerbibb8bcldeq5ej