Cargando…

Effect of maternal gestational weight gain on offspring DNA methylation: a follow-up to the ALSPAC cohort study

BACKGROUND: Several epidemiologic studies indicate that maternal gestational weight gain (GWG) influences health outcomes in offspring. Any underlying mechanisms have, however, not been established. A recent study of 88 children based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohlin, Jon, Andreassen, Bettina K, Joubert, Bonnie R, Magnus, Maria C, Wu, Michael C, Parr, Christine L, Håberg, Siri E, Magnus, Per, Reese, Sarah E, Stoltenberg, Camilla, London, Stephanie J, Nystad, Wenche
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4518864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26219460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1286-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Several epidemiologic studies indicate that maternal gestational weight gain (GWG) influences health outcomes in offspring. Any underlying mechanisms have, however, not been established. A recent study of 88 children based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) cohort examined the methylation levels at 1,505 Cytosine-Guanine methylation (CpG) loci and found several to be significantly associated with maternal weight gain between weeks 0 and 18 of gestation. Since these results could not be replicated we wanted to examine associations between 0 and 18 week GWG and genome-wide methylation levels using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (450K) platform on a larger sample size, i.e. 729 newborns sampled from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). RESULTS: We found no CpG loci associated with 0–18 week GWG after adjusting for the set of covariates used in the ALSPAC study (i.e. child’s sex and maternal age) and for multiple testing (q > 0.9, both 1,505 and 473,731 tests). Hence, none of the CpG loci linked with the genes found significantly associated with 0–18 week GWG in the ALSPAC study were significant in our study. CONCLUSIONS: The inconsistency in the results with the ALSPAC study with regards to the 0–18 week GWG model may arise for several reasons: sampling from different populations, dissimilar methylome coverage, sample size and/or false positive findings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1286-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.