Cargando…

Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens?

BACKGROUND: Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS or drones) could potentially be used for the routine transport of small goods such as diagnostic clinical laboratory specimens. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published study of the impact of UAS transportation on laboratory tests. METHODS: Three p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amukele, Timothy K., Sokoll, Lori J., Pepper, Daniel, Howard, Dana P., Street, Jeff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26222261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134020
_version_ 1782383451870068736
author Amukele, Timothy K.
Sokoll, Lori J.
Pepper, Daniel
Howard, Dana P.
Street, Jeff
author_facet Amukele, Timothy K.
Sokoll, Lori J.
Pepper, Daniel
Howard, Dana P.
Street, Jeff
author_sort Amukele, Timothy K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS or drones) could potentially be used for the routine transport of small goods such as diagnostic clinical laboratory specimens. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published study of the impact of UAS transportation on laboratory tests. METHODS: Three paired samples were obtained from each one of 56 adult volunteers in a single phlebotomy event (336 samples total): two tubes each for chemistry, hematology, and coagulation testing respectively. 168 samples were driven to the flight field and held stationary. The other 168 samples were flown in the UAS for a range of times, from 6 to 38 minutes. After the flight, 33 of the most common chemistry, hematology, and coagulation tests were performed. Statistical methods as well as performance criteria from four distinct clinical, academic, and regulatory bodies were used to evaluate the results. RESULTS: Results from flown and stationary sample pairs were similar for all 33 analytes. Bias and intercepts were <10% and <13% respectively for all analytes. Bland-Altman comparisons showed a mean difference of 3.2% for Glucose and <1% for other analytes. Only bicarbonate did not meet the strictest (Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program) performance criteria. This was due to poor precision rather than bias. There were no systematic differences between laboratory-derived (analytic) CV’s and the CV’s of our flown versus terrestrial sample pairs however CV’s from the sample pairs tended to be slightly higher than analytic CV’s. The overall concordance, based on clinical stratification (normal versus abnormal), was 97%. Length of flight had no impact on the results. CONCLUSIONS: Transportation of laboratory specimens via small UASs does not affect the accuracy of routine chemistry, hematology, and coagulation tests results from selfsame samples. However it results in slightly poorer precision for some analytes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4519103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45191032015-07-31 Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens? Amukele, Timothy K. Sokoll, Lori J. Pepper, Daniel Howard, Dana P. Street, Jeff PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS or drones) could potentially be used for the routine transport of small goods such as diagnostic clinical laboratory specimens. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published study of the impact of UAS transportation on laboratory tests. METHODS: Three paired samples were obtained from each one of 56 adult volunteers in a single phlebotomy event (336 samples total): two tubes each for chemistry, hematology, and coagulation testing respectively. 168 samples were driven to the flight field and held stationary. The other 168 samples were flown in the UAS for a range of times, from 6 to 38 minutes. After the flight, 33 of the most common chemistry, hematology, and coagulation tests were performed. Statistical methods as well as performance criteria from four distinct clinical, academic, and regulatory bodies were used to evaluate the results. RESULTS: Results from flown and stationary sample pairs were similar for all 33 analytes. Bias and intercepts were <10% and <13% respectively for all analytes. Bland-Altman comparisons showed a mean difference of 3.2% for Glucose and <1% for other analytes. Only bicarbonate did not meet the strictest (Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program) performance criteria. This was due to poor precision rather than bias. There were no systematic differences between laboratory-derived (analytic) CV’s and the CV’s of our flown versus terrestrial sample pairs however CV’s from the sample pairs tended to be slightly higher than analytic CV’s. The overall concordance, based on clinical stratification (normal versus abnormal), was 97%. Length of flight had no impact on the results. CONCLUSIONS: Transportation of laboratory specimens via small UASs does not affect the accuracy of routine chemistry, hematology, and coagulation tests results from selfsame samples. However it results in slightly poorer precision for some analytes. Public Library of Science 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4519103/ /pubmed/26222261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134020 Text en © 2015 Amukele et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Amukele, Timothy K.
Sokoll, Lori J.
Pepper, Daniel
Howard, Dana P.
Street, Jeff
Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens?
title Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens?
title_full Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens?
title_fullStr Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens?
title_full_unstemmed Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens?
title_short Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens?
title_sort can unmanned aerial systems (drones) be used for the routine transport of chemistry, hematology, and coagulation laboratory specimens?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26222261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134020
work_keys_str_mv AT amukeletimothyk canunmannedaerialsystemsdronesbeusedfortheroutinetransportofchemistryhematologyandcoagulationlaboratoryspecimens
AT sokolllorij canunmannedaerialsystemsdronesbeusedfortheroutinetransportofchemistryhematologyandcoagulationlaboratoryspecimens
AT pepperdaniel canunmannedaerialsystemsdronesbeusedfortheroutinetransportofchemistryhematologyandcoagulationlaboratoryspecimens
AT howarddanap canunmannedaerialsystemsdronesbeusedfortheroutinetransportofchemistryhematologyandcoagulationlaboratoryspecimens
AT streetjeff canunmannedaerialsystemsdronesbeusedfortheroutinetransportofchemistryhematologyandcoagulationlaboratoryspecimens