Cargando…

Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea

Despite the fact that scientific and political consideration for ecosystem services has dramatically increased over the past decade, few studies have focused on marine and coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies. We used an ecosystem services approach to assess spatial distributions o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Min Gon, Kang, Hojeong, Choi, Sung-Uk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26221950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133856
_version_ 1782383479278796800
author Chung, Min Gon
Kang, Hojeong
Choi, Sung-Uk
author_facet Chung, Min Gon
Kang, Hojeong
Choi, Sung-Uk
author_sort Chung, Min Gon
collection PubMed
description Despite the fact that scientific and political consideration for ecosystem services has dramatically increased over the past decade, few studies have focused on marine and coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies. We used an ecosystem services approach to assess spatial distributions of habitat risks and four ecosystem services (coastal protection, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality), and explored the tradeoffs among them in coastal areas of South Korea. Additionally, we analyzed how the social and ecological characteristics in coastal areas interact with conservation and development policies by using this approach. We found strong negative associations between the habitat risks and ecosystem services (aquaculture, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality) across the coastal counties. Our results showed that the intensity of the habitat risks and the provision of ecosystem services were significantly different between reclamation-dominated and conservation-dominated counties, except for coastal vulnerability. A generalized linear model suggested that reclamation projects were dependent on economic efficiency, whereas demographic pressures and habitat conditions influenced the designation of protected areas at a county level. The ecosystem services approach provided guidelines to achieve both sustainable development and environment conservation. By using the approach, we can select the priority areas for developments while we can minimize the degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. As cultural ecosystem services are evenly distributed throughout coastal areas of South Korea, decision makers may employ them to improve the conditions of coastal wetlands outside of protected areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4519238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45192382015-07-31 Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea Chung, Min Gon Kang, Hojeong Choi, Sung-Uk PLoS One Research Article Despite the fact that scientific and political consideration for ecosystem services has dramatically increased over the past decade, few studies have focused on marine and coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies. We used an ecosystem services approach to assess spatial distributions of habitat risks and four ecosystem services (coastal protection, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality), and explored the tradeoffs among them in coastal areas of South Korea. Additionally, we analyzed how the social and ecological characteristics in coastal areas interact with conservation and development policies by using this approach. We found strong negative associations between the habitat risks and ecosystem services (aquaculture, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality) across the coastal counties. Our results showed that the intensity of the habitat risks and the provision of ecosystem services were significantly different between reclamation-dominated and conservation-dominated counties, except for coastal vulnerability. A generalized linear model suggested that reclamation projects were dependent on economic efficiency, whereas demographic pressures and habitat conditions influenced the designation of protected areas at a county level. The ecosystem services approach provided guidelines to achieve both sustainable development and environment conservation. By using the approach, we can select the priority areas for developments while we can minimize the degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. As cultural ecosystem services are evenly distributed throughout coastal areas of South Korea, decision makers may employ them to improve the conditions of coastal wetlands outside of protected areas. Public Library of Science 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4519238/ /pubmed/26221950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133856 Text en © 2015 Chung et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chung, Min Gon
Kang, Hojeong
Choi, Sung-Uk
Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea
title Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea
title_full Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea
title_fullStr Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea
title_short Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea
title_sort assessment of coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies in south korea
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26221950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133856
work_keys_str_mv AT chungmingon assessmentofcoastalecosystemservicesforconservationstrategiesinsouthkorea
AT kanghojeong assessmentofcoastalecosystemservicesforconservationstrategiesinsouthkorea
AT choisunguk assessmentofcoastalecosystemservicesforconservationstrategiesinsouthkorea