Cargando…

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?

Purpose. To evaluate diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for solid breast masses with different sizes and determine which features are most efficient. Materials and Methods. 271 solid breast masses in 242 women were examined with ARFI, and their shear wave ve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Min, Zhang, Hui-Ping, Xing, Jin-Fang, Shi, Qiu-Sheng, Gu, Ji-Ying, Li, Fan, Chen, Hui-Li, Zhang, Xue-Mei, Fang, Yun, Du, Lian-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/410560
_version_ 1782383508206911488
author Bai, Min
Zhang, Hui-Ping
Xing, Jin-Fang
Shi, Qiu-Sheng
Gu, Ji-Ying
Li, Fan
Chen, Hui-Li
Zhang, Xue-Mei
Fang, Yun
Du, Lian-Fang
author_facet Bai, Min
Zhang, Hui-Ping
Xing, Jin-Fang
Shi, Qiu-Sheng
Gu, Ji-Ying
Li, Fan
Chen, Hui-Li
Zhang, Xue-Mei
Fang, Yun
Du, Lian-Fang
author_sort Bai, Min
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To evaluate diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for solid breast masses with different sizes and determine which features are most efficient. Materials and Methods. 271 solid breast masses in 242 women were examined with ARFI, and their shear wave velocities (SWVs), Virtual Touch tissue imaging (VTI) patterns, and area ratios (ARs) were measured and compared with their histopathological outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were calculated to assess diagnostic performance of ARFI for small masses (6–14 mm) and big masses (15–30 mm). Results. SWV of mass was shown to be positively associated with mass size (P < 0.001). For small masses, area under ROC (Az) of AR was larger than that of SWV (P < 0.001) and VTI pattern (P < 0.001); no significant difference was found between Az of SWV and that of VTI pattern (P = 0.906). For big masses, Az of VTI pattern was less than that of SWV (P = 0.008) and AR (P = 0.002); no significant difference was identified between Az of SWV and that of AR (P = 0.584). Conclusions. For big masses, SWV and AR are both efficient measures; nevertheless, for small masses, AR seems to be the best feature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4519539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45195392015-08-09 Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient? Bai, Min Zhang, Hui-Ping Xing, Jin-Fang Shi, Qiu-Sheng Gu, Ji-Ying Li, Fan Chen, Hui-Li Zhang, Xue-Mei Fang, Yun Du, Lian-Fang Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. To evaluate diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for solid breast masses with different sizes and determine which features are most efficient. Materials and Methods. 271 solid breast masses in 242 women were examined with ARFI, and their shear wave velocities (SWVs), Virtual Touch tissue imaging (VTI) patterns, and area ratios (ARs) were measured and compared with their histopathological outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were calculated to assess diagnostic performance of ARFI for small masses (6–14 mm) and big masses (15–30 mm). Results. SWV of mass was shown to be positively associated with mass size (P < 0.001). For small masses, area under ROC (Az) of AR was larger than that of SWV (P < 0.001) and VTI pattern (P < 0.001); no significant difference was found between Az of SWV and that of VTI pattern (P = 0.906). For big masses, Az of VTI pattern was less than that of SWV (P = 0.008) and AR (P = 0.002); no significant difference was identified between Az of SWV and that of AR (P = 0.584). Conclusions. For big masses, SWV and AR are both efficient measures; nevertheless, for small masses, AR seems to be the best feature. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4519539/ /pubmed/26258138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/410560 Text en Copyright © 2015 Min Bai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bai, Min
Zhang, Hui-Ping
Xing, Jin-Fang
Shi, Qiu-Sheng
Gu, Ji-Ying
Li, Fan
Chen, Hui-Li
Zhang, Xue-Mei
Fang, Yun
Du, Lian-Fang
Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?
title Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?
title_full Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?
title_fullStr Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?
title_short Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?
title_sort acoustic radiation force impulse technology in the differential diagnosis of solid breast masses with different sizes: which features are most efficient?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/410560
work_keys_str_mv AT baimin acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT zhanghuiping acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT xingjinfang acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT shiqiusheng acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT gujiying acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT lifan acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT chenhuili acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT zhangxuemei acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT fangyun acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient
AT dulianfang acousticradiationforceimpulsetechnologyinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsolidbreastmasseswithdifferentsizeswhichfeaturesaremostefficient