Cargando…

Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?

Background: Aphasia therapy focusing on abstract properties of language promotes both item-specific effects and generalization to untreated materials. Neuromodulation with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to enhance item-specific improvement, but its potential to enhance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Aguiar, Vânia, Bastiaanse, Roelien, Capasso, Rita, Gandolfi, Marialuisa, Smania, Nicola, Rossi, Giorgio, Miceli, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00190
_version_ 1782383550658510848
author de Aguiar, Vânia
Bastiaanse, Roelien
Capasso, Rita
Gandolfi, Marialuisa
Smania, Nicola
Rossi, Giorgio
Miceli, Gabriele
author_facet de Aguiar, Vânia
Bastiaanse, Roelien
Capasso, Rita
Gandolfi, Marialuisa
Smania, Nicola
Rossi, Giorgio
Miceli, Gabriele
author_sort de Aguiar, Vânia
collection PubMed
description Background: Aphasia therapy focusing on abstract properties of language promotes both item-specific effects and generalization to untreated materials. Neuromodulation with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to enhance item-specific improvement, but its potential to enhance generalization has not been systematically investigated. Here, we test the efficacy of ACTION (a linguistically motivated protocol) and tDCS in producing item-specific and generalized improvement in aphasia. Method: Nine individuals with post-stroke aphasia participated in this study. Participants were pre-tested with a diagnostic language battery and a cognitive screening. Experimental tasks were administered over multiple baselines. Production of infinitives, of finite verbs and of full sentences were assessed before and after each treatment phase. Nonword repetition was used as a control measure. Each subject was treated in two phases. Ten daily 1-h treatment sessions were provided per phase, in a double-blind, cross-over design. Linguistically-motivated language therapy focusing on verb inflection and sentence construction was provided in both phases. Each session began with 20 min of real or sham tDCS. Stimulation site was determined individually, based on MRI scans. Results: Group data showed improved production of treated and untreated verbs, attesting the efficacy of behavioral treatment, and its potential to yield generalization. Each individual showed significant item-specific improvement. Generalization occurred in the first phase of treatment for all subjects, and in the second phase for two subjects. Stimulation effects at the group level were significant for treated and untreated verbs altogether, but a ceiling effect for Sham cannot be excluded, as scores between real tDCS and Sham differed only before treatment. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate the efficacy of ACTION and suggest that tDCS may enhance both item-specific effects and generalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4519773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45197732016-02-22 Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs? de Aguiar, Vânia Bastiaanse, Roelien Capasso, Rita Gandolfi, Marialuisa Smania, Nicola Rossi, Giorgio Miceli, Gabriele Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Aphasia therapy focusing on abstract properties of language promotes both item-specific effects and generalization to untreated materials. Neuromodulation with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to enhance item-specific improvement, but its potential to enhance generalization has not been systematically investigated. Here, we test the efficacy of ACTION (a linguistically motivated protocol) and tDCS in producing item-specific and generalized improvement in aphasia. Method: Nine individuals with post-stroke aphasia participated in this study. Participants were pre-tested with a diagnostic language battery and a cognitive screening. Experimental tasks were administered over multiple baselines. Production of infinitives, of finite verbs and of full sentences were assessed before and after each treatment phase. Nonword repetition was used as a control measure. Each subject was treated in two phases. Ten daily 1-h treatment sessions were provided per phase, in a double-blind, cross-over design. Linguistically-motivated language therapy focusing on verb inflection and sentence construction was provided in both phases. Each session began with 20 min of real or sham tDCS. Stimulation site was determined individually, based on MRI scans. Results: Group data showed improved production of treated and untreated verbs, attesting the efficacy of behavioral treatment, and its potential to yield generalization. Each individual showed significant item-specific improvement. Generalization occurred in the first phase of treatment for all subjects, and in the second phase for two subjects. Stimulation effects at the group level were significant for treated and untreated verbs altogether, but a ceiling effect for Sham cannot be excluded, as scores between real tDCS and Sham differed only before treatment. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate the efficacy of ACTION and suggest that tDCS may enhance both item-specific effects and generalization. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4519773/ /pubmed/26903832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00190 Text en Copyright © 2015 de Aguiar, Bastiaanse, Capasso, Gandolfi, Smania, Rossi and Miceli. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
de Aguiar, Vânia
Bastiaanse, Roelien
Capasso, Rita
Gandolfi, Marialuisa
Smania, Nicola
Rossi, Giorgio
Miceli, Gabriele
Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?
title Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?
title_full Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?
title_fullStr Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?
title_full_unstemmed Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?
title_short Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?
title_sort can tdcs enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00190
work_keys_str_mv AT deaguiarvania cantdcsenhanceitemspecificeffectsandgeneralizationafterlinguisticallymotivatedaphasiatherapyforverbs
AT bastiaanseroelien cantdcsenhanceitemspecificeffectsandgeneralizationafterlinguisticallymotivatedaphasiatherapyforverbs
AT capassorita cantdcsenhanceitemspecificeffectsandgeneralizationafterlinguisticallymotivatedaphasiatherapyforverbs
AT gandolfimarialuisa cantdcsenhanceitemspecificeffectsandgeneralizationafterlinguisticallymotivatedaphasiatherapyforverbs
AT smanianicola cantdcsenhanceitemspecificeffectsandgeneralizationafterlinguisticallymotivatedaphasiatherapyforverbs
AT rossigiorgio cantdcsenhanceitemspecificeffectsandgeneralizationafterlinguisticallymotivatedaphasiatherapyforverbs
AT miceligabriele cantdcsenhanceitemspecificeffectsandgeneralizationafterlinguisticallymotivatedaphasiatherapyforverbs