Cargando…

Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of catheter removal following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has not yet been determined. This prospective study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 2 versus POD 4 after LRP and its impact on urinary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsushima, Masashi, Miyajima, Akira, Hattori, Seiya, Takeda, Toshikazu, Mizuno, Ryuichi, Kikuchi, Eiji, Oya, Mototsugu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26227018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0065-y
_version_ 1782383595750424576
author Matsushima, Masashi
Miyajima, Akira
Hattori, Seiya
Takeda, Toshikazu
Mizuno, Ryuichi
Kikuchi, Eiji
Oya, Mototsugu
author_facet Matsushima, Masashi
Miyajima, Akira
Hattori, Seiya
Takeda, Toshikazu
Mizuno, Ryuichi
Kikuchi, Eiji
Oya, Mototsugu
author_sort Matsushima, Masashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of catheter removal following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has not yet been determined. This prospective study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 2 versus POD 4 after LRP and its impact on urinary continence outcomes. METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patients underwent LRP and were prospectively randomized into two groups: group 1 (n = 57) had the urinary catheter removed on POD 2 while group 2 (n = 56) had the catheter removed on POD 4. The urine loss ratio (ULR) was defined as the weight of urine loss in the pad divided by the daily micturition volume. Continence was defined as a pad-free status. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in clinical features between groups 1 and 2. Acute urinary retention (AUR) after catheter removal occurred in 21 patients (18.6 %) (13 (22.8 %) in group 1 and 8 (14.3 %) in group 2 (p = 0.244). The first-day mean ULR values were 1.16 ± 4.95 in group 1 and 1.02 ± 3.27 in group 2 (p = 0.870). The last-day mean ULR values were 0.57 ± 1.60 in group 1 and 2.78 ± 15.49 in group 2 (p = 0.353). Continence rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 21.8, 41.1, 58.0, and 71.4 % in group 1 and 34.5, 66.0, 79.2, and 83.7 % in group 2 (p = 0.138, 0.009, 0.024, and 0.146, respectively). In AUR cases, continence rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 0, 23.1, 38.5, and 54.5 % in group 1 and 37.5, 75.0, 87.5, and 87.5 % in group 2 (p = 0.017, 0.020, 0.027, and 0.127, respectively). A multivariate analysis identified AUR after catheter removal on POD 2 as the only predictive factor for incontinence 6 and 9 months after LRP (p = 0.030 and 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that early catheter removal on POD 2 after LRP may increase the risk of incontinence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered as Clinical trial: (UMIN000014944); registration date: 12 March 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4520008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45200082015-07-31 Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial Matsushima, Masashi Miyajima, Akira Hattori, Seiya Takeda, Toshikazu Mizuno, Ryuichi Kikuchi, Eiji Oya, Mototsugu BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of catheter removal following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has not yet been determined. This prospective study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 2 versus POD 4 after LRP and its impact on urinary continence outcomes. METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patients underwent LRP and were prospectively randomized into two groups: group 1 (n = 57) had the urinary catheter removed on POD 2 while group 2 (n = 56) had the catheter removed on POD 4. The urine loss ratio (ULR) was defined as the weight of urine loss in the pad divided by the daily micturition volume. Continence was defined as a pad-free status. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in clinical features between groups 1 and 2. Acute urinary retention (AUR) after catheter removal occurred in 21 patients (18.6 %) (13 (22.8 %) in group 1 and 8 (14.3 %) in group 2 (p = 0.244). The first-day mean ULR values were 1.16 ± 4.95 in group 1 and 1.02 ± 3.27 in group 2 (p = 0.870). The last-day mean ULR values were 0.57 ± 1.60 in group 1 and 2.78 ± 15.49 in group 2 (p = 0.353). Continence rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 21.8, 41.1, 58.0, and 71.4 % in group 1 and 34.5, 66.0, 79.2, and 83.7 % in group 2 (p = 0.138, 0.009, 0.024, and 0.146, respectively). In AUR cases, continence rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 0, 23.1, 38.5, and 54.5 % in group 1 and 37.5, 75.0, 87.5, and 87.5 % in group 2 (p = 0.017, 0.020, 0.027, and 0.127, respectively). A multivariate analysis identified AUR after catheter removal on POD 2 as the only predictive factor for incontinence 6 and 9 months after LRP (p = 0.030 and 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that early catheter removal on POD 2 after LRP may increase the risk of incontinence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered as Clinical trial: (UMIN000014944); registration date: 12 March 2012. BioMed Central 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4520008/ /pubmed/26227018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0065-y Text en © Matsushima et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matsushima, Masashi
Miyajima, Akira
Hattori, Seiya
Takeda, Toshikazu
Mizuno, Ryuichi
Kikuchi, Eiji
Oya, Mototsugu
Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26227018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0065-y
work_keys_str_mv AT matsushimamasashi comparisonofcontinenceoutcomesofearlycatheterremovalonpostoperativeday2and4afterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT miyajimaakira comparisonofcontinenceoutcomesofearlycatheterremovalonpostoperativeday2and4afterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hattoriseiya comparisonofcontinenceoutcomesofearlycatheterremovalonpostoperativeday2and4afterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takedatoshikazu comparisonofcontinenceoutcomesofearlycatheterremovalonpostoperativeday2and4afterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mizunoryuichi comparisonofcontinenceoutcomesofearlycatheterremovalonpostoperativeday2and4afterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kikuchieiji comparisonofcontinenceoutcomesofearlycatheterremovalonpostoperativeday2and4afterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oyamototsugu comparisonofcontinenceoutcomesofearlycatheterremovalonpostoperativeday2and4afterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial