Cargando…

Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study

BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation is a potent mutagenic agent capable of inducing both mutation and chromosomal aberrations. Non-lethal doses of ionizing radiation may induce genomic instability favoring carcinogenesis. In spite of their mutagenic potential, this kind of radiation is an important tool...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Poonam, Vinuth, Dhundanalli puttalingaiah, Haranal, Shashidevi, Thippanna, Chandrashekar K., Naresh, Nitesh, Moger, Ganapathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229246
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.160559
_version_ 1782383603033833472
author Agarwal, Poonam
Vinuth, Dhundanalli puttalingaiah
Haranal, Shashidevi
Thippanna, Chandrashekar K.
Naresh, Nitesh
Moger, Ganapathi
author_facet Agarwal, Poonam
Vinuth, Dhundanalli puttalingaiah
Haranal, Shashidevi
Thippanna, Chandrashekar K.
Naresh, Nitesh
Moger, Ganapathi
author_sort Agarwal, Poonam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation is a potent mutagenic agent capable of inducing both mutation and chromosomal aberrations. Non-lethal doses of ionizing radiation may induce genomic instability favoring carcinogenesis. In spite of their mutagenic potential, this kind of radiation is an important tool for diagnosis of the disease and is used in medical and dental practice. It has been believed that the number of micronucleus and increased frequency of other nuclear alterations, including karyorrhexis, condensed chromatin and pyknosis, are related to the increasing effects of carcinogens. Many approaches and techniques have been developed for the monitoring of human populations exposed to various mutagens, but the analysis of micronuclei (MN) has become a standard approach for the assessment of chromosomal damage in human populations. AIM: To assess the effects of radiation exposure from panoramic radiography on the buccal epithelial cells (BECs) of pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 20 pediatric patients who had to undergo panoramic radiography for further dental treatment. Exfoliated BECs were obtained and examined immediately before and 10 days after radiation exposure. The cells were stained using rapid Papanicolaou (PAP) kit. Evaluation for MN and nuclear alterations was carried out by an oral pathologist and data were statistically analyzed using the “t” test. RESULTS: The mean number of MN in the BECs before exposure of pediatric patients to panoramic radiography was 4.25 and after exposure was 4.40. This difference was not found to be statistically significant (P < 0.0001). However, the mean nuclear alterations of 8.70 and 15.75 before and after exposure were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Panoramic radiographs can induce cytotoxicity but not genotoxic effects in buccal mucosal cells. Hence, dental radiographs should be prescribed only when deemed indispensable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4520040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45200402015-07-30 Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study Agarwal, Poonam Vinuth, Dhundanalli puttalingaiah Haranal, Shashidevi Thippanna, Chandrashekar K. Naresh, Nitesh Moger, Ganapathi J Cytol Original Article BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation is a potent mutagenic agent capable of inducing both mutation and chromosomal aberrations. Non-lethal doses of ionizing radiation may induce genomic instability favoring carcinogenesis. In spite of their mutagenic potential, this kind of radiation is an important tool for diagnosis of the disease and is used in medical and dental practice. It has been believed that the number of micronucleus and increased frequency of other nuclear alterations, including karyorrhexis, condensed chromatin and pyknosis, are related to the increasing effects of carcinogens. Many approaches and techniques have been developed for the monitoring of human populations exposed to various mutagens, but the analysis of micronuclei (MN) has become a standard approach for the assessment of chromosomal damage in human populations. AIM: To assess the effects of radiation exposure from panoramic radiography on the buccal epithelial cells (BECs) of pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 20 pediatric patients who had to undergo panoramic radiography for further dental treatment. Exfoliated BECs were obtained and examined immediately before and 10 days after radiation exposure. The cells were stained using rapid Papanicolaou (PAP) kit. Evaluation for MN and nuclear alterations was carried out by an oral pathologist and data were statistically analyzed using the “t” test. RESULTS: The mean number of MN in the BECs before exposure of pediatric patients to panoramic radiography was 4.25 and after exposure was 4.40. This difference was not found to be statistically significant (P < 0.0001). However, the mean nuclear alterations of 8.70 and 15.75 before and after exposure were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Panoramic radiographs can induce cytotoxicity but not genotoxic effects in buccal mucosal cells. Hence, dental radiographs should be prescribed only when deemed indispensable. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4520040/ /pubmed/26229246 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.160559 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Cytology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agarwal, Poonam
Vinuth, Dhundanalli puttalingaiah
Haranal, Shashidevi
Thippanna, Chandrashekar K.
Naresh, Nitesh
Moger, Ganapathi
Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study
title Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study
title_full Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study
title_fullStr Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study
title_full_unstemmed Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study
title_short Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study
title_sort genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of x-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: a pediatric study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229246
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.160559
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalpoonam genotoxicandcytotoxiceffectsofxrayonbuccalepithelialcellsfollowingpanoramicradiographyapediatricstudy
AT vinuthdhundanalliputtalingaiah genotoxicandcytotoxiceffectsofxrayonbuccalepithelialcellsfollowingpanoramicradiographyapediatricstudy
AT haranalshashidevi genotoxicandcytotoxiceffectsofxrayonbuccalepithelialcellsfollowingpanoramicradiographyapediatricstudy
AT thippannachandrashekark genotoxicandcytotoxiceffectsofxrayonbuccalepithelialcellsfollowingpanoramicradiographyapediatricstudy
AT nareshnitesh genotoxicandcytotoxiceffectsofxrayonbuccalepithelialcellsfollowingpanoramicradiographyapediatricstudy
AT mogerganapathi genotoxicandcytotoxiceffectsofxrayonbuccalepithelialcellsfollowingpanoramicradiographyapediatricstudy