Cargando…
Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas
The efficacy of bevacizumab has not been determined for treatment-refractory meningiomas. We treated meningiomas with low-dose bevacizumab and compared the radiological responses of non-irradiated meningiomas with previously irradiated meningiomas. In addition, we assessed intraparenchymal radiation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26223253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0446-0 |
_version_ | 1782383632169566208 |
---|---|
author | Furuse, Motomasa Nonoguchi, Naosuke Kawabata, Shinji Miyata, Tomo Toho, Taichiro Kuroiwa, Toshihiko Miyatake, Shin-Ichi |
author_facet | Furuse, Motomasa Nonoguchi, Naosuke Kawabata, Shinji Miyata, Tomo Toho, Taichiro Kuroiwa, Toshihiko Miyatake, Shin-Ichi |
author_sort | Furuse, Motomasa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The efficacy of bevacizumab has not been determined for treatment-refractory meningiomas. We treated meningiomas with low-dose bevacizumab and compared the radiological responses of non-irradiated meningiomas with previously irradiated meningiomas. In addition, we assessed intraparenchymal radiation necrosis following bevacizumab treatment. Six patients with meningiomas (three anaplastic, one atypical, and two grade I) who were previously treated with multiple sessions of radiotherapy and subsequently developed perilesional edema were treated with bevacizumab. Of six patients, two patients with anaplastic meningiomas developed three tumors following radiotherapy, which were defined as non-irradiated tumors. There were 12 pre-existing extra-axial tumors that were previously irradiated. Some of these tumors demonstrated adjacent intraparenchymal contrast enhancement. These tumors were defined as post-irradiated tumors. Four patients had intraparenchymal radiation necrosis. Low-dose bevacizumab was administered biweekly over 3–6 cycles to all patients. Four tumors decreased in contrast-enhanced volume, nine tumors were unchanged, and two tumors progressed. Of the three non-irradiated tumors, two tumors increased in volume (126 % and 198 %) and one tumor was stable (−5 %). The median reduction rates determined by contrast volume were −31 % and −71 % in post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis, respectively. Non-irradiated tumors had a significantly poorer response to bevacizumab than post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis (p = 0.0013 and p = 0.0005, respectively, Tukey-Kramer test). Low-dose bevacizumab did not demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of non-irradiated meningiomas. Responses to low-dose bevacizumab could be related to its effect on post-irradiation changes, rather than its effect on biologically active tumor tissue in post-irradiated meningiomas. Radiological responses to low-dose bevacizumab may distinguish biologically active tumors from post-irradiation changes in progressive meningiomas following radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4520201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45202012015-07-31 Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas Furuse, Motomasa Nonoguchi, Naosuke Kawabata, Shinji Miyata, Tomo Toho, Taichiro Kuroiwa, Toshihiko Miyatake, Shin-Ichi Radiat Oncol Case Report The efficacy of bevacizumab has not been determined for treatment-refractory meningiomas. We treated meningiomas with low-dose bevacizumab and compared the radiological responses of non-irradiated meningiomas with previously irradiated meningiomas. In addition, we assessed intraparenchymal radiation necrosis following bevacizumab treatment. Six patients with meningiomas (three anaplastic, one atypical, and two grade I) who were previously treated with multiple sessions of radiotherapy and subsequently developed perilesional edema were treated with bevacizumab. Of six patients, two patients with anaplastic meningiomas developed three tumors following radiotherapy, which were defined as non-irradiated tumors. There were 12 pre-existing extra-axial tumors that were previously irradiated. Some of these tumors demonstrated adjacent intraparenchymal contrast enhancement. These tumors were defined as post-irradiated tumors. Four patients had intraparenchymal radiation necrosis. Low-dose bevacizumab was administered biweekly over 3–6 cycles to all patients. Four tumors decreased in contrast-enhanced volume, nine tumors were unchanged, and two tumors progressed. Of the three non-irradiated tumors, two tumors increased in volume (126 % and 198 %) and one tumor was stable (−5 %). The median reduction rates determined by contrast volume were −31 % and −71 % in post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis, respectively. Non-irradiated tumors had a significantly poorer response to bevacizumab than post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis (p = 0.0013 and p = 0.0005, respectively, Tukey-Kramer test). Low-dose bevacizumab did not demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of non-irradiated meningiomas. Responses to low-dose bevacizumab could be related to its effect on post-irradiation changes, rather than its effect on biologically active tumor tissue in post-irradiated meningiomas. Radiological responses to low-dose bevacizumab may distinguish biologically active tumors from post-irradiation changes in progressive meningiomas following radiotherapy. BioMed Central 2015-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4520201/ /pubmed/26223253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0446-0 Text en © Furuse et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Furuse, Motomasa Nonoguchi, Naosuke Kawabata, Shinji Miyata, Tomo Toho, Taichiro Kuroiwa, Toshihiko Miyatake, Shin-Ichi Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas |
title | Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas |
title_full | Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas |
title_fullStr | Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas |
title_short | Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas |
title_sort | intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26223253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0446-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furusemotomasa intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas AT nonoguchinaosuke intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas AT kawabatashinji intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas AT miyatatomo intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas AT tohotaichiro intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas AT kuroiwatoshihiko intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas AT miyatakeshinichi intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas |