Cargando…

Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas

The efficacy of bevacizumab has not been determined for treatment-refractory meningiomas. We treated meningiomas with low-dose bevacizumab and compared the radiological responses of non-irradiated meningiomas with previously irradiated meningiomas. In addition, we assessed intraparenchymal radiation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furuse, Motomasa, Nonoguchi, Naosuke, Kawabata, Shinji, Miyata, Tomo, Toho, Taichiro, Kuroiwa, Toshihiko, Miyatake, Shin-Ichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26223253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0446-0
_version_ 1782383632169566208
author Furuse, Motomasa
Nonoguchi, Naosuke
Kawabata, Shinji
Miyata, Tomo
Toho, Taichiro
Kuroiwa, Toshihiko
Miyatake, Shin-Ichi
author_facet Furuse, Motomasa
Nonoguchi, Naosuke
Kawabata, Shinji
Miyata, Tomo
Toho, Taichiro
Kuroiwa, Toshihiko
Miyatake, Shin-Ichi
author_sort Furuse, Motomasa
collection PubMed
description The efficacy of bevacizumab has not been determined for treatment-refractory meningiomas. We treated meningiomas with low-dose bevacizumab and compared the radiological responses of non-irradiated meningiomas with previously irradiated meningiomas. In addition, we assessed intraparenchymal radiation necrosis following bevacizumab treatment. Six patients with meningiomas (three anaplastic, one atypical, and two grade I) who were previously treated with multiple sessions of radiotherapy and subsequently developed perilesional edema were treated with bevacizumab. Of six patients, two patients with anaplastic meningiomas developed three tumors following radiotherapy, which were defined as non-irradiated tumors. There were 12 pre-existing extra-axial tumors that were previously irradiated. Some of these tumors demonstrated adjacent intraparenchymal contrast enhancement. These tumors were defined as post-irradiated tumors. Four patients had intraparenchymal radiation necrosis. Low-dose bevacizumab was administered biweekly over 3–6 cycles to all patients. Four tumors decreased in contrast-enhanced volume, nine tumors were unchanged, and two tumors progressed. Of the three non-irradiated tumors, two tumors increased in volume (126 % and 198 %) and one tumor was stable (−5 %). The median reduction rates determined by contrast volume were −31 % and −71 % in post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis, respectively. Non-irradiated tumors had a significantly poorer response to bevacizumab than post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis (p = 0.0013 and p = 0.0005, respectively, Tukey-Kramer test). Low-dose bevacizumab did not demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of non-irradiated meningiomas. Responses to low-dose bevacizumab could be related to its effect on post-irradiation changes, rather than its effect on biologically active tumor tissue in post-irradiated meningiomas. Radiological responses to low-dose bevacizumab may distinguish biologically active tumors from post-irradiation changes in progressive meningiomas following radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4520201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45202012015-07-31 Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas Furuse, Motomasa Nonoguchi, Naosuke Kawabata, Shinji Miyata, Tomo Toho, Taichiro Kuroiwa, Toshihiko Miyatake, Shin-Ichi Radiat Oncol Case Report The efficacy of bevacizumab has not been determined for treatment-refractory meningiomas. We treated meningiomas with low-dose bevacizumab and compared the radiological responses of non-irradiated meningiomas with previously irradiated meningiomas. In addition, we assessed intraparenchymal radiation necrosis following bevacizumab treatment. Six patients with meningiomas (three anaplastic, one atypical, and two grade I) who were previously treated with multiple sessions of radiotherapy and subsequently developed perilesional edema were treated with bevacizumab. Of six patients, two patients with anaplastic meningiomas developed three tumors following radiotherapy, which were defined as non-irradiated tumors. There were 12 pre-existing extra-axial tumors that were previously irradiated. Some of these tumors demonstrated adjacent intraparenchymal contrast enhancement. These tumors were defined as post-irradiated tumors. Four patients had intraparenchymal radiation necrosis. Low-dose bevacizumab was administered biweekly over 3–6 cycles to all patients. Four tumors decreased in contrast-enhanced volume, nine tumors were unchanged, and two tumors progressed. Of the three non-irradiated tumors, two tumors increased in volume (126 % and 198 %) and one tumor was stable (−5 %). The median reduction rates determined by contrast volume were −31 % and −71 % in post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis, respectively. Non-irradiated tumors had a significantly poorer response to bevacizumab than post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis (p = 0.0013 and p = 0.0005, respectively, Tukey-Kramer test). Low-dose bevacizumab did not demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of non-irradiated meningiomas. Responses to low-dose bevacizumab could be related to its effect on post-irradiation changes, rather than its effect on biologically active tumor tissue in post-irradiated meningiomas. Radiological responses to low-dose bevacizumab may distinguish biologically active tumors from post-irradiation changes in progressive meningiomas following radiotherapy. BioMed Central 2015-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4520201/ /pubmed/26223253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0446-0 Text en © Furuse et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Furuse, Motomasa
Nonoguchi, Naosuke
Kawabata, Shinji
Miyata, Tomo
Toho, Taichiro
Kuroiwa, Toshihiko
Miyatake, Shin-Ichi
Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas
title Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas
title_full Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas
title_fullStr Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas
title_full_unstemmed Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas
title_short Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas
title_sort intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26223253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0446-0
work_keys_str_mv AT furusemotomasa intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas
AT nonoguchinaosuke intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas
AT kawabatashinji intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas
AT miyatatomo intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas
AT tohotaichiro intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas
AT kuroiwatoshihiko intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas
AT miyatakeshinichi intratumoralandperitumoralpostirradiationchangesbutnotviabletumortissuemayrespondtobevacizumabinpreviouslyirradiatedmeningiomas