Cargando…
The complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution
BACKGROUND: Epigenomic studies on humans and model species have revealed substantial inter-individual variation in histone modification profiles. However, the pattern of this variation has not been precisely characterized, particularly regarding which genomic features are enriched for variability an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-015-0019-3 |
_version_ | 1782383641953828864 |
---|---|
author | Filleton, Fabien Chuffart, Florent Nagarajan, Muniyandi Bottin-Duplus, Hélène Yvert, Gaël |
author_facet | Filleton, Fabien Chuffart, Florent Nagarajan, Muniyandi Bottin-Duplus, Hélène Yvert, Gaël |
author_sort | Filleton, Fabien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epigenomic studies on humans and model species have revealed substantial inter-individual variation in histone modification profiles. However, the pattern of this variation has not been precisely characterized, particularly regarding which genomic features are enriched for variability and whether distinct histone marks co-vary synergistically. Yeast allows us to investigate intra-species variation at high resolution while avoiding other sources of variation, such as cell type or subtype. RESULTS: We profiled histone marks H3K4me3, H3K9ac, H3K14ac, H4K12ac and H3K4me1 in three unrelated wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at single-nucleosome resolution and analyzed inter-strain differences statistically. All five marks varied significantly at specific loci, but to different extents. The number of nucleosomes varying for a given mark between two strains ranged from 20 to several thousands; +1 nucleosomes were significantly less subject to variation. Genes with highly evolvable or responsive expression showed higher variability; however, the variation pattern could not be explained by known transcriptional differences between the strains. Synergistic variation of distinct marks was not systematic, with surprising differences between functionally related H3K9ac and H3K14ac. Interestingly, H3K14ac differences that persisted through transient hyperacetylation were supported by H3K4me3 differences, suggesting stabilization via cross talk. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative variation of histone marks among S. cerevisiae strains is abundant and complex. Its relation to functional characteristics is modular and seems modest, with partial association with gene expression divergences, differences between functionally related marks and partial co-variation between marks that may confer stability. Thus, the specific context of studies, such as which precise marks, individuals and genomic loci are investigated, is primordial in population epigenomics studies. The complexity found in this pilot survey in yeast suggests that high complexity can be anticipated among higher eukaryotes, including humans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13072-015-0019-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4520285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45202852015-07-31 The complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution Filleton, Fabien Chuffart, Florent Nagarajan, Muniyandi Bottin-Duplus, Hélène Yvert, Gaël Epigenetics Chromatin Research BACKGROUND: Epigenomic studies on humans and model species have revealed substantial inter-individual variation in histone modification profiles. However, the pattern of this variation has not been precisely characterized, particularly regarding which genomic features are enriched for variability and whether distinct histone marks co-vary synergistically. Yeast allows us to investigate intra-species variation at high resolution while avoiding other sources of variation, such as cell type or subtype. RESULTS: We profiled histone marks H3K4me3, H3K9ac, H3K14ac, H4K12ac and H3K4me1 in three unrelated wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at single-nucleosome resolution and analyzed inter-strain differences statistically. All five marks varied significantly at specific loci, but to different extents. The number of nucleosomes varying for a given mark between two strains ranged from 20 to several thousands; +1 nucleosomes were significantly less subject to variation. Genes with highly evolvable or responsive expression showed higher variability; however, the variation pattern could not be explained by known transcriptional differences between the strains. Synergistic variation of distinct marks was not systematic, with surprising differences between functionally related H3K9ac and H3K14ac. Interestingly, H3K14ac differences that persisted through transient hyperacetylation were supported by H3K4me3 differences, suggesting stabilization via cross talk. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative variation of histone marks among S. cerevisiae strains is abundant and complex. Its relation to functional characteristics is modular and seems modest, with partial association with gene expression divergences, differences between functionally related marks and partial co-variation between marks that may confer stability. Thus, the specific context of studies, such as which precise marks, individuals and genomic loci are investigated, is primordial in population epigenomics studies. The complexity found in this pilot survey in yeast suggests that high complexity can be anticipated among higher eukaryotes, including humans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13072-015-0019-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4520285/ /pubmed/26229551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-015-0019-3 Text en © Filleton et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Filleton, Fabien Chuffart, Florent Nagarajan, Muniyandi Bottin-Duplus, Hélène Yvert, Gaël The complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution |
title | The complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution |
title_full | The complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution |
title_fullStr | The complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution |
title_full_unstemmed | The complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution |
title_short | The complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution |
title_sort | complex pattern of epigenomic variation between natural yeast strains at single-nucleosome resolution |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-015-0019-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filletonfabien thecomplexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT chuffartflorent thecomplexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT nagarajanmuniyandi thecomplexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT bottinduplushelene thecomplexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT yvertgael thecomplexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT filletonfabien complexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT chuffartflorent complexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT nagarajanmuniyandi complexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT bottinduplushelene complexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution AT yvertgael complexpatternofepigenomicvariationbetweennaturalyeaststrainsatsinglenucleosomeresolution |