Cargando…
A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics Review
BACKGROUND: To date there is no established consensus of assessment criteria for evaluating research ethics review. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of empirical research assessing ethics review processes in order to identify common elements assessed, research foci, and research gaps to aid in...
Autores principales: | Nicholls, Stuart G., Hayes, Tavis P., Brehaut, Jamie C., McDonald, Michael, Weijer, Charles, Saginur, Raphael, Fergusson, Dean |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133639 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Variability in research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: a scenario-based survey in three countries
por: Taljaard, Monica, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
por: Goldstein, Cory E., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Inadequate reporting of research ethics review and informed consent in cluster randomised trials: review of random sample of published trials
por: Taljaard, Monica, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research
por: Weijer, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation
por: Goldstein, Cory E., et al.
Publicado: (2018)