Cargando…
Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis
Human adults with normal vision can combine visual landmark and non-visual self-motion cues to improve their navigational precision. Here we asked whether blind individuals treated with a retinal prosthesis could also benefit from using the resultant new visual signal together with non-visual inform...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134369 |
_version_ | 1782383680090537984 |
---|---|
author | Garcia, Sara Petrini, Karin Rubin, Gary S. Da Cruz, Lyndon Nardini, Marko |
author_facet | Garcia, Sara Petrini, Karin Rubin, Gary S. Da Cruz, Lyndon Nardini, Marko |
author_sort | Garcia, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human adults with normal vision can combine visual landmark and non-visual self-motion cues to improve their navigational precision. Here we asked whether blind individuals treated with a retinal prosthesis could also benefit from using the resultant new visual signal together with non-visual information when navigating. Four patients (blind for 15-52 years) implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis (Second Sight Medical Products Inc. Sylmar, CA), and five age-matched and six younger controls, participated. Participants completed a path reproduction and a triangle completion navigation task, using either an indirect visual landmark and non-visual self-motion cues or non-visual self-motion cues only. Control participants wore goggles that approximated the field of view and the resolution of the Argus II prosthesis. In both tasks, control participants showed better precision when navigating with reduced vision, compared to without vision. Patients, however, did not show similar improvements when navigating with the prosthesis in the path reproduction task, but two patients did show improvements in the triangle completion task. Additionally, all patients showed greater precision than controls in both tasks when navigating without vision. These results indicate that the Argus II retinal prosthesis may not provide sufficiently reliable visual information to improve the precision of patients on tasks, for which they have learnt to rely on non-visual senses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4520559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45205592015-08-06 Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis Garcia, Sara Petrini, Karin Rubin, Gary S. Da Cruz, Lyndon Nardini, Marko PLoS One Research Article Human adults with normal vision can combine visual landmark and non-visual self-motion cues to improve their navigational precision. Here we asked whether blind individuals treated with a retinal prosthesis could also benefit from using the resultant new visual signal together with non-visual information when navigating. Four patients (blind for 15-52 years) implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis (Second Sight Medical Products Inc. Sylmar, CA), and five age-matched and six younger controls, participated. Participants completed a path reproduction and a triangle completion navigation task, using either an indirect visual landmark and non-visual self-motion cues or non-visual self-motion cues only. Control participants wore goggles that approximated the field of view and the resolution of the Argus II prosthesis. In both tasks, control participants showed better precision when navigating with reduced vision, compared to without vision. Patients, however, did not show similar improvements when navigating with the prosthesis in the path reproduction task, but two patients did show improvements in the triangle completion task. Additionally, all patients showed greater precision than controls in both tasks when navigating without vision. These results indicate that the Argus II retinal prosthesis may not provide sufficiently reliable visual information to improve the precision of patients on tasks, for which they have learnt to rely on non-visual senses. Public Library of Science 2015-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4520559/ /pubmed/26225762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134369 Text en © 2015 Garcia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Garcia, Sara Petrini, Karin Rubin, Gary S. Da Cruz, Lyndon Nardini, Marko Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis |
title | Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis |
title_full | Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis |
title_fullStr | Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis |
title_short | Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis |
title_sort | visual and non-visual navigation in blind patients with a retinal prosthesis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciasara visualandnonvisualnavigationinblindpatientswitharetinalprosthesis AT petrinikarin visualandnonvisualnavigationinblindpatientswitharetinalprosthesis AT rubingarys visualandnonvisualnavigationinblindpatientswitharetinalprosthesis AT dacruzlyndon visualandnonvisualnavigationinblindpatientswitharetinalprosthesis AT nardinimarko visualandnonvisualnavigationinblindpatientswitharetinalprosthesis |