Cargando…

T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: The reliable and efficient measurement of spinal cord atrophy is of growing interest in monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We compared T1- and T2-weighted MRI for measuring cervical spinal cord volume in 31 patients with MS and 18 age-matched controls (NC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Gloria, Khalid, Fariha, Oommen, Vinit V., Tauhid, Shahamat, Chu, Renxin, Horsfield, Mark A., Healy, Brian C., Bakshi, Rohit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26227960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0387-0
_version_ 1782383808329285632
author Kim, Gloria
Khalid, Fariha
Oommen, Vinit V.
Tauhid, Shahamat
Chu, Renxin
Horsfield, Mark A.
Healy, Brian C.
Bakshi, Rohit
author_facet Kim, Gloria
Khalid, Fariha
Oommen, Vinit V.
Tauhid, Shahamat
Chu, Renxin
Horsfield, Mark A.
Healy, Brian C.
Bakshi, Rohit
author_sort Kim, Gloria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reliable and efficient measurement of spinal cord atrophy is of growing interest in monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We compared T1- and T2-weighted MRI for measuring cervical spinal cord volume in 31 patients with MS and 18 age-matched controls (NC) from T1-weighted gradient recalled echo and T2-weighted fast spin-echo 1.5 T axial acquisitions. The two sequences were matched on slice thickness, signal averages and voxel size. An active surface software tool determined the normalized mean cervical cord cross-sectional area. RESULTS: T1-derived cord areas were higher than T2 areas in the whole cohort (estimated mean difference = 7.03 mm(2) (8.89 %); 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 5.91, 8.14; p < 0.0001) and in both groups separately. There were trends for lower spinal cord areas in MS vs. NC with both sequences. For the T1 cord area, the mean difference was 3.7 mm(2) (4.55 %) (95 % CI: −1.36, 8.78; p = 0.15). For the T2 cord area, the difference was larger [mean difference 4.9 mm(2) (6.52 %) (95 % CI: −0.83, 10.67); p = 0.091]. The T1 and T2 cord areas showed similar weak to moderate correlations with measures of clinical status and T2 spinal cord lesion volume in the MS group. Superficial spinal cord T2 lesions had no apparent confounding effect on the outlining tool. The mean intra-rater and inter-rater coefficients of variation ranged from 0.27 to 0.91 % for T1- and 0.66 to 0.99 % for T2-derived cord areas. CONCLUSION: T2-weighted images may prove efficient for measuring cervical spinal cord atrophy in MS, with the added advantage of lesion detectability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4521382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45213822015-08-01 T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis Kim, Gloria Khalid, Fariha Oommen, Vinit V. Tauhid, Shahamat Chu, Renxin Horsfield, Mark A. Healy, Brian C. Bakshi, Rohit BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: The reliable and efficient measurement of spinal cord atrophy is of growing interest in monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We compared T1- and T2-weighted MRI for measuring cervical spinal cord volume in 31 patients with MS and 18 age-matched controls (NC) from T1-weighted gradient recalled echo and T2-weighted fast spin-echo 1.5 T axial acquisitions. The two sequences were matched on slice thickness, signal averages and voxel size. An active surface software tool determined the normalized mean cervical cord cross-sectional area. RESULTS: T1-derived cord areas were higher than T2 areas in the whole cohort (estimated mean difference = 7.03 mm(2) (8.89 %); 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 5.91, 8.14; p < 0.0001) and in both groups separately. There were trends for lower spinal cord areas in MS vs. NC with both sequences. For the T1 cord area, the mean difference was 3.7 mm(2) (4.55 %) (95 % CI: −1.36, 8.78; p = 0.15). For the T2 cord area, the difference was larger [mean difference 4.9 mm(2) (6.52 %) (95 % CI: −0.83, 10.67); p = 0.091]. The T1 and T2 cord areas showed similar weak to moderate correlations with measures of clinical status and T2 spinal cord lesion volume in the MS group. Superficial spinal cord T2 lesions had no apparent confounding effect on the outlining tool. The mean intra-rater and inter-rater coefficients of variation ranged from 0.27 to 0.91 % for T1- and 0.66 to 0.99 % for T2-derived cord areas. CONCLUSION: T2-weighted images may prove efficient for measuring cervical spinal cord atrophy in MS, with the added advantage of lesion detectability. BioMed Central 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4521382/ /pubmed/26227960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0387-0 Text en © Kim et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Gloria
Khalid, Fariha
Oommen, Vinit V.
Tauhid, Shahamat
Chu, Renxin
Horsfield, Mark A.
Healy, Brian C.
Bakshi, Rohit
T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis
title T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis
title_short T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis
title_sort t1- vs. t2-based mri measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26227960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0387-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kimgloria t1vst2basedmrimeasuresofspinalcordvolumeinhealthysubjectsandpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT khalidfariha t1vst2basedmrimeasuresofspinalcordvolumeinhealthysubjectsandpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT oommenvinitv t1vst2basedmrimeasuresofspinalcordvolumeinhealthysubjectsandpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT tauhidshahamat t1vst2basedmrimeasuresofspinalcordvolumeinhealthysubjectsandpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT churenxin t1vst2basedmrimeasuresofspinalcordvolumeinhealthysubjectsandpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT horsfieldmarka t1vst2basedmrimeasuresofspinalcordvolumeinhealthysubjectsandpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT healybrianc t1vst2basedmrimeasuresofspinalcordvolumeinhealthysubjectsandpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT bakshirohit t1vst2basedmrimeasuresofspinalcordvolumeinhealthysubjectsandpatientswithmultiplesclerosis